Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Sachia Vickery Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Friedsam vs Vickery analysis and find out who is favored!
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Sachia Vickery Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Friedsam has won 46.26% of points on his second serve, while Vickery has won 46.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Friedsam, in recent form, has won 52.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vickery has won 60.83%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.97% and 41.62% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Friedsam has saved 61.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vickery has saved 50.46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Friedsam has won 43.75% of matches played (W/L 21/ 27), with Vickery winning 58.73% (W/L 37/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Friedsam has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 109/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 16/ 18). Vickery has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 27/ 18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 23/ 25).
- Player level: In the last year, Friedsam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 12/ 10), where as Vickery has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 14/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Friedsam winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Friedsam winning 2 and Vickery winning 0. The last match between Friedsam and Vickery was at the Dow Tennis Classic - Midland, 03-11-2022, Second, I.hard with Anna-Lena Friedsam getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:52.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Friedsam and Vickery have played a deciding set 0 times, with Friedsam winning 0 times and Vickery 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Friedsam winning 0, and Vickery 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Friedsam has played against opponents with an average rank of 192.73 while Vickery has played against players with an average rank of 247.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Friedsam has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vickery has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Friedsam has converted 40.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vickery has converted 48.9% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Friedsam 1 - 0 Vickery
189
Rank
45
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
134
Rank
73
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
59% (355-242)
Career Total W/L
57% (381-291)
27% (3-8)
YTD W/L
63% (15-9)
$1,003,807
Career Prize Money
$1,050,280
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Sachia Vickery |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:52 | 1:10:52 |
| 1st Serve % | 80% (40/50) | 42% (23/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (30/40) | 61% (14/23) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (5/10) | 44% (14/32) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (27/55) | 30% (15/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Sachia Vickery
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve %
42%
(
23 of
55)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Sachia Vickery |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 27% (3/8) | 63% (15/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 34% (10/19) | 61% (33/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 43% (114/153) | 55% (288/237) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 64% (9/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 67% (6/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 36 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 74 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:5 | 1:41:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 197.91 | 206.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (601/886) | 53% (921/1732) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (360/601) | 63% (582/921) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (122/285) | 46% (372/811) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (32/91) | 49% (122/251) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (350/877) | 49% (859/1761) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 71% (10/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 56% (5/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 27% (3/11) | 63% (15/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (4/0) | 93% (14/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (4/4) | 7% (14/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 43% (7/3) | 20% (10/2) |
Anna-Lena Friedsam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve %
73%
(
16 of
22)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
33
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
113)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
59 of
113)
103
Total Points Won
79
|
5-7 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Talia Gibson
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
10
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Veronika Erjavec
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
7
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
49 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Greetje Minnen
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
103)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Sachia Vickery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Sachia Vickery
55%
(
60 of
110)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
2
Aces
1
15
Double Faults
4
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
40%
(
20 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
48%
(
53 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
51 of
92)
108
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Greetje Minnen
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
76%
(
50 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Sachia Vickery
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Mccartney Kessler
54%
(
49 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
44 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Lauren Davis
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Sachia Vickery
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
67)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Schmiedlova
Player
Sachia Vickery
68%
(
73 of
108)
1st Serve %
53%
(
59 of
111)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
45%
(
49 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Rebecca Marino
44%
(
21 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
70)
1
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Friedsam Vs Vickery Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
