Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Jule Niemeier Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Friedsam vs Niemeier analysis and find out who is favored!
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Jule Niemeier Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Friedsam has won 46.26% of points on his second serve, while Niemeier has won 41.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Friedsam, in recent form, has won 52.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Niemeier has won 57.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.97% and 40.47% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Friedsam has saved 61.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Niemeier has saved 53.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Friedsam has won 43.75% of matches played (W/L 21/ 27), with Niemeier winning 51.72% (W/L 30/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Friedsam has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 109/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 16/ 18). Niemeier has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 115/ 60), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 46% (W/L 32/ 37).
- Player level: In the last year, Friedsam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 12/ 10), where as Niemeier has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 14/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Friedsam winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Friedsam winning 1 and Niemeier winning 2. The last match between Friedsam and Niemeier was at the W25 Aschaffenburg, 19-07-2019, Quarterfinals, Clay with Jule Niemeier getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Friedsam and Niemeier have played a deciding set 1 times, with Friedsam winning 0 times and Niemeier 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Friedsam winning 0, and Niemeier 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Friedsam has played against opponents with an average rank of 192.73 while Niemeier has played against players with an average rank of 214.97.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Friedsam has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Niemeier has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Friedsam has converted 40.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Niemeier has converted 47.23% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Friedsam 0 - 1 Niemeier
189
Rank
45
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
109
Rank
61
High
24
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
59% (355-242)
Career Total W/L
60% (191-129)
27% (3-8)
YTD W/L
61% (17-11)
$1,003,807
Career Prize Money
$1,005,523
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Jule Niemeier |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 15 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:0 | 2:3:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (55/81) | 58% (62/106) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (37/55) | 58% (36/62) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (11/26) | 45% (20/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (50/106) | 41% (33/81) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(8) 0-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Jule Niemeier
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
58%
(
62 of
106)
1st Serve %
68%
(
55 of
81)
4
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
4
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
50 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
89
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Jule Niemeier |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 27% (3/8) | 61% (17/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 34% (10/19) | 58% (38/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 43% (114/153) | 52% (326/299) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 65% (13/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 75% (3/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 36 | 65 |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 0.63 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 192 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:5 | 1:45:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 197.91 | 192.43 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (601/886) | 56% (1142/2050) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (360/601) | 65% (746/1142) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (122/285) | 43% (386/908) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (32/91) | 48% (126/263) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (350/877) | 47% (984/2092) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 67% (8/4) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 58% (7/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 27% (3/11) | 61% (17/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (4/0) | 94% (17/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (4/4) | 6% (17/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 43% (7/3) | 9% (11/1) |
Anna-Lena Friedsam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve %
73%
(
16 of
22)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
33
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
113)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
59 of
113)
103
Total Points Won
79
|
5-7 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Talia Gibson
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
10
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Veronika Erjavec
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
7
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
49 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Greetje Minnen
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
103)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jule Niemeier Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
Player
Jule Niemeier
74%
(
78 of
105)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
43%
(
45 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cristina Bucsa
Player
Jule Niemeier
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
41%
(
29 of
71)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
13
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nuria Brancaccio
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
8
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Jule Niemeier
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Storm Hunter
Player
Jule Niemeier
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
51%
(
29 of
57)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Nao Hibino
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
98)
6
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
46%
(
60 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Jule Niemeier
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Varvara Gracheva
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Claire Liu
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jule Niemeier
Player
Natalija Stevanovic
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
110)
4
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
27%
(
10 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
54%
(
49 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
58 of
110)
100
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Friedsam Vs Niemeier Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
