Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Christina McHale Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Friedsam vs McHale analysis and find out who is favored!
Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Christina McHale Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Friedsam has won 46.26% of points on his second serve, while McHale has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Friedsam, in recent form, has won 52.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while McHale has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.97% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Friedsam has saved 61.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas McHale has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Friedsam has won 43.75% of matches played (W/L 21/ 27), with McHale winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Friedsam has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 109/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 16/ 18). McHale has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Friedsam has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.55% of matches (W/L 12/ 10), where as McHale has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Friedsam has played against opponents with an average rank of 192.73 while McHale has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Friedsam has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while McHale has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Friedsam has converted 40.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and McHale has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Friedsam 0 - 0 McHale
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anna-Lena Friedsam | Christina McHale |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 27% (3/8) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 34% (10/19) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 43% (114/153) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 36 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0.39 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 50 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:5 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 197.91 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (601/886) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (360/601) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (122/285) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (32/91) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (350/877) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (2/4) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 27% (3/11) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (4/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (4/4) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 43% (7/3) | 1st Match |
Anna-Lena Friedsam Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve %
73%
(
16 of
22)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
5 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
33
Total Points Won
11
|
6-0 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Rubber 3 |
Stats
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
73 of
113)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
10
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
59 of
113)
103
Total Points Won
79
|
5-7 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Talia Gibson
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
101)
7
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
10
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
63)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Veronika Erjavec
65%
(
73 of
112)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
108)
7
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
49 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jodie Anna Burrage
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
45 of
66)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Greetje Minnen
76%
(
60 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
103)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
63%
(
45 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Christina McHale Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ysaline Bonaventure
Player
Christina Mchale
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yue Yuan
Player
Christina Mchale
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Christina Mchale
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christina Mchale
Player
Grace Min
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
46 of
65)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Christina Mchale
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
26 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katherine Sebov
Player
Christina Mchale
84%
(
61 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christina Mchale
Player
Maria Mateas
58%
(
60 of
104)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
3
Aces
4
12
Double Faults
7
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
107
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Sorribes Tormo
Player
Christina Mchale
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
31 of
45)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christina Mchale
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Christina Mchale
Player
Viktoria Hruncakova
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Friedsam Vs McHale Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
