Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anna Ureke vs Anne Schaefer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ureke vs Schaefer analysis and find out who is favored!
Anna Ureke vs Anne Schaefer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ureke has won 41.38% of points on his second serve, while Schaefer has won 46.03%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ureke, in recent form, has won 66.43% of his opponent's second serve points, while Schaefer has won 57.92%. The same stats for first serve returns are 45.29% and 41.46% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ureke has saved 45.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schaefer has saved 46.03% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ureke has won 62.5% of matches played (W/L 15/ 9), with Schaefer winning 58.62% (W/L 17/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ureke has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Schaefer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 471/ 236), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Ureke has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 12/ 8), where as Schaefer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.71% of matches (W/L 17/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ureke has played against opponents with an average rank of 178.29 while Schaefer has played against players with an average rank of 291.69.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ureke has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schaefer has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ureke has converted 56.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schaefer has converted 39.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ureke 0 - 0 Schaefer
877
Rank
631
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
696
Rank
161
High
37
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
55% (132-110)
Career Total W/L
65% (486-266)
70% (7-3)
YTD W/L
57% (4-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$25,289
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anna Ureke | Anne Schaefer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 70% (7/3) | 57% (4/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (15/8) | 53% (8/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (108/84) | 50% (73/73) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 70% (7/3) | 57% (4/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.01 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 1 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 20 | 21 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:12 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 205.3 | 249.14 |
| 1st Serve % | 79% (487/620) | 61% (298/487) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (265/487) | 57% (169/298) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (56/133) | 46% (87/189) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (56/102) | 39% (33/84) |
| Return Pts W% | 53% (343/645) | 47% (242/511) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (4/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (7/10) | 57% (4/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 0% (3/0) |
Anna Ureke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Ksenia Laskutova
Player
Anna Ureke
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
21 of
32)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
53
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Irina Balus
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
9
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Ashmitha Easwaramurthi
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
79%
(
49 of
62)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Edda Mamedova
80%
(
70 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
72 of
111)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
6
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
Break Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
55%
(
48 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
65 of
111)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tianmi Mi
Player
Anna Ureke
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
83%
(
62 of
75)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
1-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Gio Jang
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
38%
(
15 of
39)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Krystyna Pochtovyk
85%
(
55 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
47%
(
26 of
55)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
33 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Maria Sara Popa
Player
Anna Ureke
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Nika Radisic
81%
(
52 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
30 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Ureke
Player
Fiona Ganz
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Anne Schaefer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Anne Schaefer
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Leonie Kung
Player
Anne Schaefer
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anne Schaefer
Player
Alice Rame
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
57 of
89)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anne Schaefer
Player
Sofia Shapatava
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anne Schaefer
Player
Verena Meliss
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anne Schaefer
Player
Emma Ottavia Ghirardato
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viola Turini
Player
Anne Schaefer
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nika Radisic
Player
Anne Schaefer
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anne Schaefer
Player
Amina Anshba
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
72%
(
60 of
83)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
44 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anne Schaefer
Player
Jessica Bertoldo
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
23 of
41)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ureke Vs Schaefer Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
