Prediction of Anna Siskova [471st] vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters [549th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W W L W L
Form
W W W W W W W W W LHead-To-Head: Siskova 0 - 1 Peeters
They have played 3 sets in total, with Siskova winning 1 and Peeters winning 2. The last match between Siskova and Peeters was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 16-03-2025, Final, Hard with Anouck Vrancken Peeters getting the victory 7-5 3-6 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anna Siskova | 0 |
| Anouck Vrancken Peeters | 1 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Anna Siskova
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 13 | Games Won | 16 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:14:48 | Average Match Time | 2:14:48 |
| 60% (54/90) | 1st Serve % | 67% (57/85) |
| 61% (33/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (32/57) |
| 42% (15/36) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (12/28) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 64% (7/11) |
| 48% (41/85) | Return Points Win % | 47% (42/90) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Anna Siskova vs Anouck Vrancken Peeters Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Siskova 0 - 1 Peeters
Editorial Prediction:
When it comes to their second serve performance over the past six months, Siskova has managed to win 33.24% of points, which pales in comparison to Peeters, who has secured 37.18%. This statistic alone can often be a significant predictor of match outcomes. But what about their ability to handle return games? Siskova has won 47.89% of her opponent's second serve points, while Peeters triumphs slightly more at 48.47%. Such nuances in return game performance cannot be overlooked when forecasting the likely winner of this face-off.
Another critical aspect to consider is how both players perform under pressure. We've observed that Siskova has saved 41.75% of breakpoints recently, but Peeters has fared better with a 45.09% save rate. This could prove pivotal for in-game betting, especially when either player is on the verge of conceding a break. Delving into their overall performance over the past year, Siskova boasts an impressive win rate of 70% (28 wins to 12 losses), while Peeters is close behind, with 67.31% (35 wins to 17 losses). This head-to-head comparison will be crucial to assessing who might have the upper hand.
Now, let's examine their surface preferences and historical success. Siskova's best surface seems to be Hard, with a 69% win rate (72 wins to 33 losses), but she struggles on Grass, having only won 20% of the time (1 win to 4 losses). Conversely, Peeters thrives on I.hard surfaces, showcasing an 81% win rate (22 wins to 5 losses), while she finds challenging opponents on Clay, with a 52% win rate (39 wins to 36 losses). These surface dynamics might sway the favor in the match.
The level and quality of competition they have faced also offer insights. Siskova has played most of her matches in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, with a remarkable 91.67% win rate (22 wins to 2 losses), while Peeters shows a 73.08% win rate (19 wins to 7 losses) at the same tournament level. Additionally, Siskova's opponents have had an average rank of 455.4, compared to Peeters' more difficult foes with an average rank of 357.35. The ability to overcome higher-ranked opponents may play a crucial role here.
Finally, if the match stretches into a deciding set, Peeters holds the advantage, having won 63% of her deciding-set encounters in the last year, whereas Siskova has only claimed victory in 33% of those tight situations. With these comprehensive stats at your disposal, predicting the match winner leans slightly towards Peeters, given her superior performance under pressure, impressive track record on I.hard surfaces, and ability to close tight matches.
Anna Siskova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Noelia Bouzo Zanotti
Player
Anna Siskova
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve %
90%
(
9 of
10)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
10
Total Points Won
5
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Marina Benito
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Anna Siskova
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
95)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
89%
(
54 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Amandine Hesse
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
58%
(
82 of
142)
2
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
8
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
56 of
82)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
60 of
142)
125
Total Points Won
121
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Cristina Diaz Adrover
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
49%
(
30 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Maria Herazo Gonzalez
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
16 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Anna Siskova
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Isabella Shinikova
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Evgeniya Burdina
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
51
Total Points Won
17
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Anouck Vrancken Peeters Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Oksana Selekhmeteva
Player
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
41 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Bibiane Schoofs
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Esther Lopez Alcaraz
63%
(
5 of
8)
1st Serve %
78%
(
7 of
9)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
40%
(
2 of
5)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
3 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
12
Total Points Won
5
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Anna Siskova
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Julita Saner
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Victoria Allen
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
74%
(
70 of
95)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Ann Akasha Ceuca
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Jeong Moon
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Anastasia Kulikova
76%
(
68 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
83)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
29%
(
6 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Katarina Kuzmova
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (239/181) | Win/Loss | 60% (108/71) |
| 55% (536/442) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (240/172) |
| 52% (4561/4132) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2030/1705) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 355 | Aces Total | 109 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.45 |
| 1210 | Total Double Faults | 813 |
| 1:33:25 | Average Match Time | 1:34:54 |
| 497.03 | Average Opponent Rank | 378.71 |
| 68% (17934/26487) | 1st Serve % | 63% (6541/10429) |
| 57% (10278/17934) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (3836/6541) |
| 43% (3695/8553) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1688/3888) |
| 51% (1892/3736) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (738/1403) |
| 49% (13014/26484) | Return Points Win % | 49% (4978/10108) |
| 57% (235/414) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (107/177) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (30/59) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (11/26) |
| 57% (81/142) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (31/56) |
| 84% (238/199) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (96/85) |
| 16% (238/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (96/11) |
| 22% (182/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (83/22) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
