Anna Kubareva vs Giada Di Paola Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L W L L W L L
Form
W W L W W L W W L LHead To Head: Kubareva 1 - 0 Paola
They have played 2 sets in total, with Kubareva winning 2 and Paola winning 0. The last match between Kubareva and Paola was at the W15 Sharm ElSheikh, 02-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Anna Kubareva getting the victory 6-3 3-0 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anna Kubareva | 1 |
| Giada Di Paola | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W15 Sharm ElSheikh(02-04-2025)
Anna Kubareva
Giada Di Paola
6
3
3
0
| Kubareva | Stats | Paola |
|---|---|---|
| 33% (4-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (9-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 820 | Ranking | N/A |
| 269 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 24 | Age | 20 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 6 | Titles | 0 |
| 61% (213-135) | Career Total W/L | 49% (21-22) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Masarova VS Stojanovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London wta
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bouquier VS Lajovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
25 Jun 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-0 ret. |
Stats 
Anna Kubareva
Player
Giada Di Paola
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
25 of
37)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
47
Total Points Won
30
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 9 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:19:41 | Average Match Time | 1:19:41 |
| 68% (27/40) | 1st Serve % | 68% (25/37) |
| 70% (19/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 40% (10/25) |
| 46% (6/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (5/12) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 59% (22/37) | Return Points Win % | 38% (15/40) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kubareva vs Paola Match Preview :
As the battle lines are drawn for this upcoming tennis match, the numbers tell a fascinating story. When looking at recent form over the past six months, Kubareva has managed to win 30.46% of her second serve points, while Paola edges slightly ahead with 34.33%. Does this slight edge in second serve performance give Paola an advantage, and how might it influence the overall match outcome?
Delving into return game statistics, Kubareva excels in pressuring her opponents on their second serve, capturing an impressive 56.84% of those points. In comparison, Paola trails with 50.86%. When it comes to first serve returns, Kubareva again takes the lead with 38.48%, while Paola follows with 28.41%. Can these figures determine a favorite for this head-to-head encounter?
Pressure situations often define a player's mettle, and the ability to save breakpoints is critical. Kubareva has saved 45.81% of breakpoints in recent encounters, whereas Paola has demonstrated resilience by saving 54.72%. Such statistics can be crucial for in-game analysis, but do they tip the balance in favor of Paola?
Exploring their performance over the last year, Kubareva has clinched victory in 53.85% of her matches, maintaining a record of 21 wins to 18 losses. Meanwhile, Paola emerges slightly above with a 55.17% win rate and a 16-13 record. How does this shape our perspective on the players' readiness and current form?
Surface effectiveness undeniably shapes player fortunes; Kubareva thrives on hard courts with a 65% win rate but falters on clay, with just 51%. Conversely, Paola relishes the clay with a 53% success rate while struggling on hard surfaces at 38%. Could the surface type dictate the ebb and flow of this thrilling encounter?
Regarding the competition level, Kubareva has been active primarily in the Challengers/ITF tournaments with a 56.52% win rate, while Paola features in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a near-even 55% win rate. How does the quality of past opponents, with Kubareva facing an average ranking of 355.49 and Paola at 138.72, influence predictions?
If the match stretches to a deciding set, the advantage appears to lie with Kubareva, given her 45% success rate in clinching such nail-biting duels, compared to Paola's 25%. This might be a critical factor for those tracking in-game dynamics and real-time predictions.
Beyond historical performance, the ability to convert breakpoints is significant. Kubareva has converted 43.41% of opportunities, while Paola lags at 35.71%. This prowess, particularly under high-stakes conditions, might provide Kubareva with an edge during critical moments.
In conclusion, while Paola showcases a slight edge in second serve performance and breakpoint savings, Kubareva's strengths in break points and returns may prove decisive. Given the nuances of their stats, Kubareva appears poised to emerge victorious in this competitive showdown, leveraging her formidable return game and breakpoint conversion prowess to seize the day.
Kubareva vs Paola Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Anna Kubareva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Arina Gabriela Vasilescu
Player
Anna Kubareva
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anouck Vrancken Peeters
Player
Anna Kubareva
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Kubareva
Player
Berta Passola
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
79%
(
38 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dasha Ivanova
Player
Anna Kubareva
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ranah Akua Stoiber
Player
Anna Kubareva
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
12
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
89%
(
8 of
9)
47%
(
47 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
102)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
5-7 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Kubareva
Player
Michelle Dzjachangirova
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
103)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
13
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
103)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carolyn Ansari
Player
Anna Kubareva
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
68%
(
19 of
28)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
50%
(
12 of
24)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
53%
(
18 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
26
Total Points Won
36
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Kubareva
Player
Giada Di Paola
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
25 of
37)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
47
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Giada Di Paola Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 5-7 15-13 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasiya Poplavska
Player
Giada Di Paola
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
58 of
85)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-1 6-7(5) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Giada Di Paola
Player
Holly Hutchinson
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
61 of
87)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
9
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 3-6 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Giada Di Paola
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
3
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
29%
(
8 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Giada Di Paola
Player
Veronika Udina
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 1-6 13-11 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Kubareva
Player
Giada Di Paola
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
25 of
37)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
47
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (213/135) | Win/Loss | 49% (21/22) |
| 60% (472/318) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (52/48) |
| 54% (3845/3262) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (517/529) |
| 65% (149/81) | Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) |
| 50% (32/32) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (8/8) |
| 59% (32/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (6/6) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 251 | Aces Total | 19 |
| 0.4 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 1380 | Total Double Faults | 71 |
| 1:33:22 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 489.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 150.12 |
| 68% (13938/20644) | 1st Serve % | 63% (723/1144) |
| 58% (8153/13938) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (407/723) |
| 42% (2783/6706) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (168/421) |
| 50% (1525/3065) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (56/123) |
| 50% (10575/21216) | Return Points Win % | 44% (457/1027) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 58% (107/79) | Challenger W/L | 58% (7/5) |
| 65% (106/56) | Futures W/L | 47% (14/16) |
| 61% (211/345) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (21/43) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (29/51) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 86% (6/7) |
| 52% (49/95) | Deciding Set Win % | 29% (4/14) |
| 88% (210/184) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (22/19) |
| 12% (210/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (22/3) |
| 22% (138/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (21/2) |
Kubareva vs. Paola Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
