Anna Bondar vs Maddison Inglis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W L W W L
Form
L L W W L W W L L LHead-2-Head: Bondar 1 - 1 Inglis
They have played 5 sets in total, with Bondar winning 2 and Inglis winning 3. The last match between Bondar and Inglis was at the Miami Open - Miami, 16-03-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Hard, with Anna Bondar getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anna Bondar | 1 |
| Maddison Inglis | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Miami Open - Miami(16-03-2025)
Anna Bondar
Maddison Inglis
3
6
6
3
6
2
| Bondar | Stats | Inglis |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (20-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 61% (17-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 89 | Ranking | 155 |
| 50 | Highest Rank | 112 |
| 27 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 19 | Titles | 9 |
| 63% (423-247) | Career Total W/L | 60% (295-200) |
| $636,651 | Career Prize Money | $460,080 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Clay
Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome atp
18 May 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Blinkova VS Malygina PREDICTION Clay
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg wta
17 May 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Anna Bondar
Player
Maddison Inglis
52%
(
44 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
10
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
||||
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Anna Bondar
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 24 | Games Won | 24 |
| 13 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 2:4:36 | Average Match Time | 2:4:36 |
| 49% (75/152) | 1st Serve % | 60% (100/168) |
| 75% (56/75) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (67/100) |
| 47% (36/77) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (32/68) |
| 35% (6/17) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (6/12) |
| 41% (69/168) | Return Points Win % | 39% (60/152) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bondar vs Inglis Match Preview :
Analyzing the second serve performance over the past six months, Bondar has won 42.14% of points on her second serve, narrowly edging out Inglis, who secured 41.78%. This statistic is significantly correlated with the likelihood of winning a match. Additionally, the return game analysis reveals that Bondar has claimed 48.11% of her opponent's second serve points, compared to Inglis's 46.77% during the same period. While considering return of first serves, Bondar outpaces Inglis with 33.09% to 30.96%, which holds substantial weight in predicting the outcome of their encounters.
Delving into the performance overview, in the past year, Bondar has achieved a win rate of 56.58% across all matches, with a win-loss tally of 43-33. Meanwhile, Inglis has outperformed her with a 65.43% win rate, accumulating a record of 53-28. This provides a broad yet insightful perspective into their head-to-head dynamics. Furthermore, under pressure, Bondar has saved 50% of breakpoints, slightly better than Inglis's 47.69%, an essential metric for those interested in in-game betting predictions.
Exploring surface preferences, Bondar excels on clay with a career win rate of 69% (W/L 303/137), but she struggles on grass with a win percentage of 0% (W/L 0/6). Inglis, on the other hand, performs best on hard courts, holding a 62% win rate (W/L 233/144), yet her performance on indoor hard courts is minimal, with no wins (W/L 0/2). Both players have primarily competed at the Challengers/ITF level tournaments with prize pools exceeding $10K over the past year. Bondar boasts a win rate of 76.32% (W/L 29/9), whereas Inglis follows with 67.69% (W/L 44/21).
When examining their head-to-head record, Inglis leads as she triumphed in their sole previous encounter at the BNP Paribas Open in Indian Wells. The historical match, which unfolded on a hard court, saw Inglis securing victory with a scoreline of 7-5, 6-4. Their direct competition lasts an average of 1 hour, 52 minutes, and 8 seconds, suggesting closely contested matches.
Further insights can be drawn from opponent quality statistics. Bondar has faced players with an average rank of 212.83 in the past 12 months, which is notably superior to Inglis's opponents, who held an average rank of 284.19. Inglis also demonstrates a slight edge in deciding set performance, winning 54% of such situations, compared to Bondar's 45%. With break point conversion rates standing at 34.47% for Bondar and 36.67% for Inglis, the latter holds a slight advantage in capitalizing on critical scoring opportunities.
Taking into account the current form, historical match outcomes, and specific performance statistics, Inglis appears slightly favored to claim victory in their upcoming clash. Her recent track record and overall strengths in pivotal moments may well tilt the scales in her favor.
Bondar vs Inglis Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Anna Bondar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Irina-Camelia Begu
Player
Anna Bondar
72%
(
78 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
95)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Camilla Rosatello
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Alycia Parks
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Anna Bondar
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
56 of
85)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Ella Seidel
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
13
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Alize Cornet
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Julia Grabher
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Darja Semenistaja
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Maddison Inglis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jenny Lim
Player
Maddison Inglis
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
49%
(
46 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Maddison Inglis
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Maddison Inglis
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Lanlana Tararudee
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
5
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Hayu Kinoshita
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
37 of
53)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Maddison Inglis
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
13
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Erika Andreeva
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
5
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maddison Inglis
Player
Emily Appleton
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (423/247) | Win/Loss | 60% (295/200) |
| 61% (942/595) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (661/475) |
| 54% (7748/6550) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (5493/4811) |
| 55% (82/66) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (237/148) |
| 69% (315/142) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (21/24) |
| 44% (26/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36% (4/7) |
| 0% (0/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 61% (33/21) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 2075 | Aces Total | 750 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1152 | Total Double Faults | 1323 |
| 1:28:32 | Average Match Time | 1:28:10 |
| 429.4 | Average Opponent Rank | 445.21 |
| 59% (23081/39154) | 1st Serve % | 65% (18332/28034) |
| 66% (15224/23081) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (11480/18332) |
| 48% (7715/16073) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4522/9702) |
| 47% (2229/4769) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1686/3523) |
| 44% (17727/39914) | Return Points Win % | 45% (13080/29007) |
| 25% (6/18) | Slam W/L | 44% (16/20) |
| 44% (15/19) | Masters W/L | 27% (3/8) |
| 47% (9/10) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (50/52) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (18/27) |
| 66% (221/114) | Challenger W/L | 64% (251/143) |
| 78% (122/34) | Futures W/L | 78% (7/2) |
| 63% (415/661) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (291/484) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 52% (88/169) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (62/95) |
| 50% (100/202) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (80/153) |
| 87% (432/375) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (292/249) |
| 13% (432/57) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (292/43) |
| 20% (238/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (203/46) |
Bondar vs. Inglis Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
