J. Grabher
To Win
A. Banks
To Win
Anna Bondar vs Julia Grabher Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W W W W L W L
Form
L W W W W L L W W LHead-To-Head: Bondar 1 - 0 Grabher
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bondar winning 2 and Grabher winning 0. The last match between Bondar and Grabher was at the W100 Wiesbaden, 04-05-2025, Round: Final, Surface: Clay, with Anna Bondar getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anna Bondar | 1 |
| Julia Grabher | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W100 Wiesbaden(04-05-2025)
Anna Bondar
Julia Grabher
6
2
6
4
| Bondar | Stats | Grabher |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (26-19) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (32-16) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 75 | Ranking | 141 |
| 50 | Highest Rank | 54 |
| 28 | Age | 28 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 19 | Titles | 17 |
| 63% (429-250) | Career Total W/L | 60% (396-261) |
| $753,651 | Career Prize Money | $402,254 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
24 Jun 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS Fonseca PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
25 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Perricard VS Norrie PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
22 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Anna Bondar
Player
Julia Grabher
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:35:21 | Average Match Time | 1:35:21 |
| 69% (45/65) | 1st Serve % | 58% (33/57) |
| 67% (30/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (23/33) |
| 70% (14/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (6/24) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 13% (1/8) |
| 49% (28/57) | Return Points Win % | 32% (21/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bondar vs Grabher Match Preview :
How does one navigate the thrilling unpredictability of a tennis match, shining a spotlight on the players who will inevitably vie for glory on the court? As we prepare to witness the clash between Bondar and Grabher, let's delve into the statistical nuances that shape predictions for this head-to-head matchup.
When examining second serve performance, Bondar has emerged victorious in 43% of her second serve points over the past six months, outpacing Grabher, who trails slightly with a 37.78% success rate. Could this be the advantage Bondar needs to tip the scales in her favor? There's a noteworthy relationship between second serve prowess and overall match prediction accuracy, hinting at a potential edge for Bondar.
Furthermore, return game statistics unveil another layer of competitiveness. In recent form, Bondar has claimed 48.81% of her opponent's second serve points, while Grabher follows closely with 45.34%. Also, observing first serve returns, Bondar continues to dominate, capturing 34.44% in contrast to Grabher’s 29.16%. Is this a glimpse into a tactical upper hand for Bondar?
Pressures arise, and the ability to maintain composure is paramount. While Bondar has successfully thwarted 48.77% of breakpoints, Grabher is not far behind with a solid 47.55% in breakpoint defenses. Although quite close, every percentage counts in these high-tension moments, crucial for in-match betting enthusiasts.
However, past performances over the year reveal Grabher’s superior win rate of 65.22% compared to Bondar’s 57.33%. Could this underline a strategic resilience or a testament to the quality of opponents? Considering opponent caliber, Bondar has faced rivals with an average rank of 177.17, suggesting she’s well-acquainted with top-tier competition. Conversely, Grabher contends with an average opponent rank of 306.32. Does this level the playing field or crown Bondar the more battle-hardened competitor?
Reflecting on their best surfaces, both players exhibit their clay court mastery, with Bondar winning 69% and Grabher claiming 65% of their respective matches. Grass, however, remains a challenge, with Bondar yet to secure victory and Grabher managing a mere 20% success rate.
Interestingly, both players have dominated the Challengers/ITF circuits above $10K, with Bondar boasting a win rate of 78.79%, while Grabher trails slightly at 77.78%. Could this near-parity suggest a competitive encounter, where victory hinges on marginal differences in skill and strategy?
Deciding sets might also hold the answer. Bondar’s 57% win rate in deciding sets versus Grabher’s 50% could mean Bondar’s resilience under pressure may be critical. As the clock ticks closer to their duel, perhaps the wisest prediction would place Bondar as the slight favorite, previewing a match adorned with small turns that could define the path to victory.
Bondar vs Grabher Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Anna Bondar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kimberly Birrell
Player
Anna Bondar
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Megan Knight
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Anna Bondar
60%
(
64 of
107)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
42 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
111)
110
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Kathinka Von Deichmann
53%
(
42 of
79)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Jil Teichmann
56%
(
53 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Haruka Kaji
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
73%
(
33 of
45)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elina Svitolina
Player
Anna Bondar
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Julia Grabher Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Julia Grabher
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Federica Urgesi
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
47
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Despina Papamichail
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Julia Grabher
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Julia Grabher
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(1) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Caty McNally
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Kyoka Okamura
81%
(
55 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Anouk Koevermans
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
47
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (429/250) | Win/Loss | 60% (396/261) |
| 61% (955/602) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (875/613) |
| 54% (7858/6641) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7262/6187) |
| 55% (82/66) | Hard Win/Loss | 45% (30/36) |
| 69% (320/144) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (346/185) |
| 44% (26/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 35% (19/36) |
| 13% (1/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 2103 | Aces Total | 689 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 1174 | Total Double Faults | 2458 |
| 1:28:56 | Average Match Time | 1:21:51 |
| 429.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 475 |
| 59% (23458/39818) | 1st Serve % | 65% (23813/36828) |
| 66% (15472/23458) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (14817/23813) |
| 48% (7865/16360) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (5801/13013) |
| 47% (2264/4842) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (2383/4864) |
| 44% (18011/40558) | Return Points Win % | 47% (17571/37441) |
| 27% (7/19) | Slam W/L | 37% (10/17) |
| 44% (15/19) | Masters W/L | 47% (8/9) |
| 47% (9/10) | Cups W/L | 32% (7/15) |
| 49% (51/53) | Main Tour W/L | 34% (20/38) |
| 66% (225/115) | Challenger W/L | 63% (255/149) |
| 78% (122/34) | Futures W/L | 74% (96/33) |
| 63% (421/670) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (389/644) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 52% (90/172) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (64/130) |
| 50% (101/204) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (96/181) |
| 87% (439/381) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (386/345) |
| 13% (439/58) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (386/40) |
| 20% (240/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (271/53) |
Bondar vs. Grabher Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
