Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anna Bondar vs Gabriela Ce Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bondar vs Ce analysis and find out who is favored!
Anna Bondar vs Gabriela Ce Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bondar has won 47.24% of points on his second serve, while Ce has won 37.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bondar, in recent form, has won 54.58% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ce has won 56.25%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.63% and 41.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bondar has saved 55.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ce has saved 56.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bondar has won 58.33% of matches played (W/L 42/ 30), with Ce winning 43.86% (W/L 25/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bondar has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 278/ 127), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5). Ce has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 351/ 257), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Bondar has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.91% of matches (W/L 29/ 15), where as Ce has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.59% of matches (W/L 23/ 31). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Bondar winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Bondar winning 3 and Ce winning 2. The last match between Bondar and Ce was at the W25 Potchefstroom, 11-02-2021, Second, Hard with Anna Bondar getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:8:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bondar and Ce have played a deciding set 1 times, with Bondar winning 0 times and Ce 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bondar winning 0, and Ce 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bondar has played against opponents with an average rank of 248.17 while Ce has played against players with an average rank of 260.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bondar has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ce has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bondar has converted 46.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ce has converted 51.9% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bondar 1 - 1 Ce
108
Rank
50
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
430
Rank
221
High
31
Age
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
64% (372-210)
Career Total W/L
55% (422-339)
60% (18-12)
YTD W/L
53% (10-9)
$415,265
Career Prize Money
$26,182
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Anna Bondar | Gabriela Ce |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 25 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:30 | 2:8:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (84/152) | 65% (102/156) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (60/84) | 59% (60/102) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (32/68) | 50% (27/54) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 41% (9/22) | 35% (7/20) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (69/156) | 39% (60/152) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Anna Bondar
Player
Gabriela Ce
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| 2-6 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Anna Bondar
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
45%
(
43 of
95)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
95)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anna Bondar | Gabriela Ce |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (18/12) | 53% (10/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (40/29) | 53% (23/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (326/300) | 51% (204/194) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 40% (2/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 70% (7/3) | 57% (8/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.47 | 0.01 |
| Aces Total | 144 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.48 |
| DFs Total | 72 | 94 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:18 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 261.83 | 246.58 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1139/1981) | 72% (1006/1396) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (775/1139) | 58% (581/1006) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (397/842) | 38% (149/390) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (108/231) | 55% (89/163) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (939/2135) | 49% (640/1301) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 71% (15/6) | 50% (8/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (17/29) | 53% (10/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 86% (6/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (17/15) | 91% (11/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (17/2) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 0% (8/0) |
Anna Bondar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Maria Sara Popa
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Katerina Tsygourova
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
82%
(
40 of
49)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Anna Bondar
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
53 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Kayla Day
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Susan Bandecchi
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Jesika Maleckova
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Karolina Kozakova
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Anna Bondar
38%
(
29 of
76)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
47)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
60%
(
28 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesca Jones
Player
Anna Bondar
72%
(
59 of
82)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
2
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Tatjana Maria
56%
(
63 of
113)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
54%
(
27 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
45 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
108
|
0-6 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Gabriela Ce Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Ruzic
Player
Gabriela Ce
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
48%
(
25 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Ekaterina Yashina
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Zala Bizjak
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
55%
(
18 of
33)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miriana Tona
Player
Gabriela Ce
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
77%
(
65 of
84)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
99
Total Points Won
82
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Leticia Garcia Vidal
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
19 of
41)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
9
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
19 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raluca Georgiana Serban
Player
Gabriela Ce
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Oana Gavrila
Player
Gabriela Ce
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
68 of
97)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
5
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
49%
(
49 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Maria Kononova
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Lilian Poling
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
76)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
11
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
49%
(
37 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Gabriela Ce
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
45%
(
22 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Bondar Vs Ce Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Anna Bondar
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
