Anna Bondar vs Celine Naef Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W L W W L
Form
W L L L W W L W L LHead-To-Head: Bondar 2 - 0 Naef
They have played 6 sets in total, with Bondar winning 4 and Naef winning 2. The last match between Bondar and Naef was at the Megasaray Hotels Open 3 - Antalya, 02-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Anna Bondar getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anna Bondar | 2 |
| Celine Naef | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Megasaray Hotels Open 3 - Antalya(02-04-2025)
Anna Bondar
Celine Naef
6
2
3
6
6
3
| Bondar | Stats | Naef |
|---|---|---|
| 56% (20-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (10-9) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 87 | Ranking | 191 |
| 50 | Highest Rank | 121 |
| 27 | Age | 19 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 19 | Titles | 7 |
| 63% (423-247) | Career Total W/L | 64% (119-66) |
| $636,651 | Career Prize Money | $220,512 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Gibert VS Samsonova PREDICTION Clay
Internationaux de Strasbourg - Strasbourg wta
22 May 2025 / Quarterfinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Hontama VS Jones PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
21 May 2025 / Q2 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Anna Bondar
Player
Celine Naef
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
| 2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Celine Naef
53%
(
59 of
111)
1st Serve %
45%
(
47 of
104)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
42%
(
22 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
47%
(
52 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
109
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 30 | Games Won | 26 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 2:19:35 | Average Match Time | 2:19:35 |
| 56% (106/190) | 1st Serve % | 48% (89/187) |
| 64% (68/106) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (55/89) |
| 51% (43/84) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (46/98) |
| 55% (11/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (9/26) |
| 46% (86/187) | Return Points Win % | 42% (79/190) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bondar vs Naef Match Preview :
In the realm of second serve performance over the past six months, Bondar has secured 40.89% of points on her second serve, while Naef marginally edges her out with a 41.21% success rate. This subtle yet critical difference can influence the match outcome prediction, highlighting the competitive edge Naef may possess in this particular area.
The return game statistics further illustrate Bondar's current form, dominating with a 49.42% success rate on her opponent’s second serve, compared to Naef’s 46.11%. However, when it comes to returning first serves, Bondar again leads, having won 32.8% of points compared to Naef's 30.57%, providing a strong indicator of who could potentially dominate this head-to-head matchup.
Analyzing how the players handle pressure, Bondar has an edge, having saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, slightly better than Naef's 45.56%. Such statistics are critical for making informed predictions during live matches, especially when betting considerations are involved.
Looking at their overall performance in the past year, Bondar boasts a win rate of 57.89% (W/L 44/32), narrowly surpassing Naef's 56.14% (W/L 32/25), furnishing a comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview. Surface preference also plays a crucial role; Bondar excels on clay with a victory rate of 69%, whereas Naef finds her best results on indoor hard courts, winning 73% of her matches.
Both players participate primarily in Challengers/ITF tournaments priced over $10K. Bondar has demonstrated superior performance with a win ratio of 77.78% (W/L 28/8), whereas Naef’s win percentage stands at 63.83% (W/L 30/17), accounting for their relative experience in various event tiers.
Direct head-to-head confrontations reveal Bondar's dominance, with a 1-0 lead over Naef. In their sole encounter at the W 75 Porto semifinals, Bondar prevailed in a three-set battle, marking a significant victory. The average duration of past matches suggests lengthy, hard-fought contests, averaging 2 hours and 37 minutes.
A deeper look into extreme pressure situations and deciding sets reveals Bondar's slight upper hand. Out of one deciding set played in their head-to-head history, Bondar emerged victorious. Additionally, having won the only tiebreaker played against Naef, Bondar seems better poised for success under high-stakes conditions.
Over the past year, the caliber of opponents faced by both players has been comparable, with Bondar competing against opponents with an average rank of 212.62, slightly lower than Naef’s average opponent rank of 212.09. Should the match reach a deciding third set, Naef’s impressive 69% win rate in deciding sets over the last year may suggest an advantage.
Lastly, recent form in breakpoint conversion shows Naef converting 38.05% of her opportunities, overshadowing Bondar's 33.02%. This statistic may provide a strategic advantage for Naef during crucial match situations.
After evaluating these metrics, it is evident that Bondar holds a marginal advantage, primarily due to her historical performance in direct encounters and her ability to perform under pressure. Therefore, based on these statistics, Bondar is predicted to win the upcoming match.
Bondar vs Naef Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Anna Bondar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Irina-Camelia Begu
Player
Anna Bondar
72%
(
78 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
95)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
43 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Camilla Rosatello
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Alycia Parks
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ashlyn Krueger
Player
Anna Bondar
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
56 of
85)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Ella Seidel
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
13
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Alize Cornet
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Julia Grabher
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Darja Semenistaja
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Celine Naef Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Celine Naef
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kaja Juvan
Player
Celine Naef
43%
(
35 of
82)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Sara Cakarevic
42%
(
40 of
95)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
42 of
62)
62%
(
34 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alice Rame
Player
Celine Naef
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
9
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Stefanie Voegele
45%
(
18 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Marta Kostyuk
50%
(
47 of
94)
1st Serve %
132%
(
70 of
53)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Celine Naef
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
51%
(
42 of
83)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xinyu Gao
Player
Celine Naef
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve %
52%
(
23 of
44)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (423/247) | Win/Loss | 64% (119/66) |
| 61% (942/595) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (264/168) |
| 54% (7748/6550) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (2174/1788) |
| 55% (82/66) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (16/10) |
| 69% (315/142) | Clay Win/Loss | 53% (26/23) |
| 44% (26/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 72% (71/27) |
| 0% (0/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 2075 | Aces Total | 538 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1152 | Total Double Faults | 413 |
| 1:28:32 | Average Match Time | 1:36:12 |
| 227.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 306.85 |
| 59% (23081/39154) | 1st Serve % | 60% (7581/12665) |
| 66% (15224/23081) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (4877/7581) |
| 48% (7715/16073) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2484/5084) |
| 47% (2229/4769) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (798/1597) |
| 44% (17727/39914) | Return Points Win % | 46% (5858/12709) |
| 25% (6/18) | Slam W/L | 40% (6/9) |
| 44% (15/19) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 47% (9/10) | Cups W/L | 20% (1/4) |
| 49% (50/52) | Main Tour W/L | 38% (3/5) |
| 66% (221/114) | Challenger W/L | 68% (96/45) |
| 78% (122/34) | Futures W/L | 87% (13/2) |
| 63% (415/661) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (119/185) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (88/169) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (21/37) |
| 50% (100/202) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (36/62) |
| 87% (432/375) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (112/97) |
| 13% (432/57) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (112/15) |
| 20% (238/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 30% (73/22) |
Bondar vs. Naef Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
