D. Vekic
To Win
A. Blinkova
To Win
Anna Blinkova vs Kaitlin Quevedo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L W W W L
Form
W L L W L W L W L LHead-2-Head: Blinkova 1 - 0 Quevedo
They have played 2 sets in total, with Blinkova winning 2 and Quevedo winning 0. The last match between Blinkova and Quevedo was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 22-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Anna Blinkova getting the victory 6-4 7-6(7).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anna Blinkova | 1 |
| Kaitlin Quevedo | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(22-04-2025)
Anna Blinkova
Kaitlin Quevedo
6
4
7
6
| Blinkova | Stats | Quevedo |
|---|---|---|
| 57% (17-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 52% (13-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 65 | Ranking | 244 |
| 34 | Highest Rank | 244 |
| 26 | Age | 19 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 6 | Titles | 7 |
| 57% (317-237) | Career Total W/L | 66% (91-46) |
| $2,244,558 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Muchova VS Parks PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Andreeva VS Bucsa PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris wta
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(7) |
Stats 
Anna Blinkova
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
78%
(
73 of
94)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:54:24 | Average Match Time | 1:54:24 |
| 78% (73/94) | 1st Serve % | 71% (51/72) |
| 53% (39/73) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (27/51) |
| 43% (9/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (7/21) |
| 67% (6/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (5/12) |
| 53% (38/72) | Return Points Win % | 49% (46/94) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Blinkova vs Quevedo Match Preview :
In recent form over the last six months, Blinkova has consistently demonstrated superior performance on her second serve, winning 38.27% of points compared to Quevedo's 36.69%. This particular stat closely correlates with accurate match predictions. On the return side, Blinkova has been more successful, capturing 52.18% of her opponent's second serve points, whereas Quevedo has managed 48.56%. However, when it comes to first serve returns, Quevedo has a slight edge with 35.93% over Blinkova's 33.04%.
Another crucial aspect to consider in this comparison is the ability to handle pressure during matches. Quevedo has displayed a better capacity to save breakpoints, successfully fending off 46.85% of them, while Blinkova has saved 42.81%. This statistic can be particularly useful for in-game betting predictions. When examining overall match performance in the past year, Quevedo shows a stronger win-loss record, securing victory in 67.14% of her matches, compared to Blinkova's 48.33%.
Surfaces also play a significant role in predicting match outcomes. Blinkova boasts her highest career win percentage on indoor hard courts at 67%, while her weakest surface is grass, where she holds an even 50% win rate. Conversely, Quevedo's best results have come on hard courts with a 74% success rate, and her least preferred surface appears to be clay, where she still maintains a respectable 65% win percentage.
A deeper analysis of the level of competition faced reveals that Blinkova has competed against higher-ranked opponents, averaging a rank of 128.12 over the last twelve months, while Quevedo's opponents have had an average rank of 353.97. Despite this, Quevedo has demonstrated remarkable performance in deciding sets, winning 69% of them compared to Blinkova's 47% in the last year.
Ultimately, making a detailed prediction involves weighing all these statistics carefully. Based on the available data—factoring in current performance metrics, the ability to perform under pressure, and past records—Quevedo seems better positioned to win this upcoming match. This prediction is enhanced by her more favorable statistics in surface performance, match win percentage, and deciding set outcomes.
Blinkova vs Quevedo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Anna Blinkova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Anna Blinkova
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Blinkova
Player
Magdalena Frech
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
0
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Blinkova
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Blinkova
Player
Elena Malygina
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
78%
(
59 of
76)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Anna Blinkova
47%
(
36 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
57 of
88)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Blinkova
Player
Lisa Pigato
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Anna Blinkova
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kaitlin Quevedo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Lian Tran
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
78%
(
54 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
64 of
87)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Dmitruk
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
87%
(
55 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
48%
(
30 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Mila Masic
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
56%
(
66 of
117)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
95)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
39 of
66)
39%
(
20 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
48 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
47%
(
16 of
34)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
41%
(
16 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
46
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Blinkova
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
78%
(
73 of
94)
1st Serve %
71%
(
51 of
72)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
49%
(
46 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Irene Burillo Escorihuela
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (317/237) | Win/Loss | 66% (91/46) |
| 55% (715/574) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (198/123) |
| 52% (6144/5628) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (1613/1299) |
| 54% (119/102) | Hard Win/Loss | 74% (26/9) |
| 55% (76/62) | Clay Win/Loss | 63% (57/33) |
| 67% (98/49) | Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (8/4) |
| 50% (24/24) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1308 | Aces Total | 182 |
| 0.43 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 2477 | Total Double Faults | 334 |
| 1:33:29 | Average Match Time | 1:45:45 |
| 327.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 440.04 |
| 61% (22661/37203) | 1st Serve % | 66% (5987/9059) |
| 63% (14184/22661) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (3566/5987) |
| 44% (6368/14542) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1487/3072) |
| 48% (2314/4786) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (638/1313) |
| 46% (17245/37330) | Return Points Win % | 49% (4420/9044) |
| 53% (35/31) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (25/28) | Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (107/102) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 65% (133/71) | Challenger W/L | 58% (55/40) |
| 81% (17/4) | Futures W/L | 90% (35/4) |
| 57% (310/541) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (90/136) |
| 80% (4/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (59/121) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (13/25) |
| 55% (101/184) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (30/46) |
| 86% (312/269) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (82/73) |
| 13% (312/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (82/9) |
| 20% (242/48) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (55/18) |
Blinkova vs. Quevedo Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
