Ann Li vs Maria Lourdes Carle Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L W L W L
Form
W L L W W L L W W LHead-To-Head: Li 1 - 0 Carle
They have played 2 sets in total, with Li winning 2 and Carle winning 0. The last match between Li and Carle was at the French Open - Paris, 27-05-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Ann Li getting the victory 6-4 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ann Li | 1 |
| Maria Lourdes Carle | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(27-05-2025)
Ann Li
Maria Lourdes Carle
6
4
6
0
| Li | Stats | Carle |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (17-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (23-20) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 65 | Ranking | 124 |
| 44 | Highest Rank | 71 |
| 25 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 14 |
| 59% (247-170) | Career Total W/L | 64% (316-179) |
| $1,574,083 | Career Prize Money | $344,005 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Mikrut VS Meza PREDICTION Clay
Plava Laguna Croatia Open - Umag atp
20 Jul 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rakhimova VS Lepchenko PREDICTION Hard
Mubadala Citi DC Open - Washington wta
19 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-0 |
Stats 
Ann Li
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:15:0 | Average Match Time | 1:15:0 |
| 60% (29/48) | 1st Serve % | 65% (36/55) |
| 66% (19/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (20/36) |
| 74% (14/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 26% (5/19) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 55% (30/55) | Return Points Win % | 31% (15/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Li vs Carle Match Preview :
- Second serve performance shows Carle winning 34.66% of these points recently, while Li leads with 41.76%. Could this impact their expected match performance advantageously for Li?
- Return game stats reveal Carle's higher effectiveness, winning 54.09% on second serve returns compared to Li's 49.84%. On first serve returns, Carle prevails with 37.81% against Li's 31.53%.
- Under pressure, Li slightly edges out Carle by saving 48.47% of breakpoints, as opposed to Carle's 45.43%, which might influence in-game betting predictions.
- Over the past year, Li has a superior match win rate of 63.38%, compared to Carle's 52.86%, suggesting a stronger overall performance.
- Both players excel on clay, with Carle at 66% and Li at 64%, whereas grass remains a challenge for both, with Carle winning 43% and Li 33%.
- In the last year, Li outperformed Carle in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.75% compared to Carle's 55% success rate.
- Recent opponents have been tougher for Li, with an average rank of 152.58 versus Carle's opponents ranking at 177.09 on average.
- If it reaches a deciding set, Li shows a greater tendency to prevail, winning 61% of such scenarios compared to Carle's 50% success rate.
- Break point conversion presents Li with a slight advantage, converting 39.24% of opportunities, narrowly surpassing Carle's 38.76% rate.
Editorial Prediction (May 27, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match positions Li with a potential upper hand due to their superior second serve performance, first serve return proficiency, and breakpoint efficiency.
Li’s higher match win rate over the past year and better results in deciding sets further bolster their favored status.
Despite Carle’s edge in returning second serves, the overall statistical analysis points to Li as the more adaptable and consistent competitor in varied situations.
Considering these stats, Li appears to have the optimal edge and is likely to emerge victorious in this matchup.
Li vs Carle Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Ann Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Anna Siskova
Player
Ann Li
76%
(
57 of
75)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Guiomar Zuleta De Reales
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
78%
(
60 of
77)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Ann Li
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
104
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(5) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Viktorija Golubic
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
104)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Ann Li
74%
(
71 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
56 of
99)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Suzan Lamens
Player
Ann Li
66%
(
61 of
92)
1st Serve %
48%
(
54 of
113)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Anastasia Potapova
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jessica Pegula
Player
Ann Li
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Maria Lourdes Carle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Sorana Cirstea
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Elina Avanesyan
69%
(
60 of
87)
1st Serve %
75%
(
74 of
99)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
41 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
35 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darja Semenistaja
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
81%
(
48 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nuria Brancaccio
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
12
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
49%
(
43 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
51 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Sada Nahimana
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
76%
(
81 of
106)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
9
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
53%
(
50 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
106)
98
Total Points Won
103
|
1-6 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Lourdes Carle
Player
Nina Vargova
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
44 of
65)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
26 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
70%
(
55 of
79)
1st Serve %
77%
(
60 of
78)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (247/170) | Win/Loss | 64% (316/179) |
| 57% (543/413) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (702/451) |
| 53% (4662/4149) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (5723/4651) |
| 59% (134/92) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (86/55) |
| 63% (77/45) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (224/117) |
| 63% (27/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) |
| 35% (9/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 927 | Aces Total | 264 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.41 |
| 995 | Total Double Faults | 2078 |
| 1:28:19 | Average Match Time | 1:43:19 |
| 361.03 | Average Opponent Rank | 377.36 |
| 60% (16586/27465) | 1st Serve % | 66% (20334/30687) |
| 63% (10503/16586) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (12070/20334) |
| 47% (5139/10879) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (4244/10347) |
| 48% (1605/3343) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (2362/4502) |
| 45% (12256/27043) | Return Points Win % | 51% (15657/30954) |
| 46% (21/25) | Slam W/L | 40% (8/12) |
| 43% (13/17) | Masters W/L | 62% (13/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 75% (6/2) |
| 61% (51/33) | Main Tour W/L | 45% (17/21) |
| 63% (153/91) | Challenger W/L | 62% (185/114) |
| 69% (9/4) | Futures W/L | 80% (87/22) |
| 59% (240/407) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (313/492) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 53% (47/89) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (44/95) |
| 59% (74/125) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (91/163) |
| 87% (231/201) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (289/252) |
| 13% (231/30) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (289/37) |
| 25% (186/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 31% (206/63) |
Li vs. Carle Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
