MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Ann Li vs Eva Lys Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-to-head: Li 0 - 1 Lys

They have played 3 sets in total, with Li winning 1 and Lys winning 2. The last match between Li and Lys was at the Dubai Duty Free Championships - Dubai, 14-02-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Eva Lys getting the victory 4-6 6-1 2-0 ret..

Dubai Duty Free Championships - Dubai(14-02-2025)

Li
Stats
Lys
57% (8-6)
YTD Win/Loss
59% (10-7)
0
Head-to-Head
1
66
Ranking
78
44
Highest Rank
77
24
Age
23
R
Plays
-
5
Titles
3
60% (238-160)
Career Total W/L
61% (154-100)
$1,342,860
Career Prize Money
$1,073,309
0
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
1
0
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0

Upcoming Match

Upcoming Match

Today’s Tennis Tips:

Gracheva VS Parks PREDICTION Hard

Miami Open - Miami wta

18 Mar 2025 / First

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Alycia Parks

To Win

77.93 %
16.95%

Serrano VS Mboko PREDICTION Hard

Miami Open - Miami wta

18 Mar 2025 / First

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Victoria Mboko

To Win

65.48 %
12.85%

Li VS Lys H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
4-6 6-1 2-0 ret.
cross
Eva Lys
Player
Ann Li
69% ( 40 of 58)
1st Serve %
48% ( 33 of 69)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
68% ( 27 of 40)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 21 of 33)
39% ( 7 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 14 of 36)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
41% ( 24 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 34 of 69)
68
Total Points Won
59

Li VS Lys H2H Stats

Ann Li Li
Stats
Eva Lys Lys
0
H2H Matches
1
1
Sets Won
2
7
Games Won
12
3
Aces (Total)
0
6
Total Double Faults
4
1:22:51
Average Match Time
1:22:51
48% (33/69)
1st Serve %
69% (40/58)
64% (21/33)
1st Serve Win %
68% (27/40)
39% (14/36)
2nd Serve Win %
39% (7/18)
50% (2/4)
Break Points Won % (Total)
56% (5/9)
41% (24/58)
Return Points Win %
49% (34/69)
0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
100% (1/1)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Ann Li vs Eva Lys Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Ann Li 0 - 1 Eva Lys

  1. Recent Form Analysis: Second Serve Performance In the past six months, Li has exhibited a commendable prowess on their second serve, triumphing in 48.83% of the points, while Lys has displayed an even more impressive performance, seizing victory in 50.19% of such points. It is worth noting the significant correlation between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
  2. Recent Form Analysis: Return Game Statistics Analyzing recent form, Li has successfully conquered 55.74% of the opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Lys has showcased exceptional prowess in this domain, capturing victory in 56.77% of comparable points. In terms of first serve returns, Li boasts a success rate of 40.92%, while Lys trails slightly with 40.34%. These parameters hold considerable significance in determining the favored contender in their head-to-head encounter.
  3. Assessment under Pressure When pressured by crucial moments, Li has demonstrated admirable resilience, saving an impressive 52.84% of breakpoints in recent matches. Lys, on the other hand, has proven equally adept in maintaining composure and has saved 53.44% of such predicaments. This metric holds considerable value for predicting in-game betting outcomes.
  4. Performance Overview Over the course of the past year, Li has achieved a commendable 65.33% success rate, winning 49 out of 75 matches played. Lys, too, has exhibited remarkable skill, with a win percentage of 63.46% from 52 matches played. These figures provide an encompassing overview of their head-to-head prediction.
  5. Preferred Playing Surfaces Li's track record manifests their utmost proficiency on clay courts, where they boast an impressive winning percentage of 64% from 109 matches. Conversely, their performance on grass courts indicates relative vulnerability, attaining a mere 33% success rate from 21 matches contested. Lys, on the other hand, thrives on indoor hard courts with a remarkable win percentage of 67% from 43 matches. However, their performance on grass courts proves more middling, with a 50% success rate from 10 matches.
  6. Player Level and Tournament Type In the previous year, Li predominantly contributed to the Challenger and ITF tournaments exceeding $10K in prize money, securing victory in 66.67% of matches played, amounting to 42 wins from 63 encounters. Lys, meanwhile, has primarily participated in main tour tournaments, obtaining a commendable success rate of 57.89% by emerging victorious in 33 matches out of 57. It is vital to contextualize and weigh these statistics according to the event level at which the players have been engaged.
  7. Opponent Quality Analysis In the past twelve months, Li has faced adversaries with an average ranking of 240.89, whereas Lys has encountered opponents boasting an average rank of 234.37. These figures shed light on the caliber of competition each contender has been exposed to.
  8. Decisive Set Performance against All Opponents For those keen on live predictions and betting activities, it is noteworthy that over the past year, Li has emerged victorious in 63% of deciding sets. Lys, equally formidable in these critical scenarios, has secured victory in 65% of all matches played on the professional tour.
  9. Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics Historical performance proves invaluable when predicting tennis matches. However, once an event is underway, current event statistics assume paramount importance, providing insight into players' current form and momentum. For relevant indications of in-form players, kindly refer to the section below. Additionally, it is essential to consider that certain players may exhibit enhanced proficiency at specific events, rendering their performance a crucial factor in outcome determination.
  10. Break Point Conversion Analysis Assessing recent performances, Li has effectively converted 45.78% of their breakpoint opportunities. Lys, equally adept in seizing favorable moments, has capitalized on 46.98% of chances to break their opponents' serve. This particular statistic serves as an instrumental resource for astute in-game betting tips.
  11. If delving into models targeting tennis match predictions is of interest, this article provides an auspicious starting point. Caution, however, is advised as it caters to those with an affinity for statistical intricacies.

Ann Li Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R1
cross
Irina-Camelia Begu
Player
Ann Li
53% ( 41 of 77)
1st Serve %
52% ( 44 of 84)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
66% ( 27 of 41)
1st Serve Won
68% ( 30 of 44)
64% ( 23 of 36)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 18 of 40)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
35% ( 27 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 36 of 84)
86
Total Points Won
75
L
7-5 3-6 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Eva Lys
Player
Ann Li
69% ( 40 of 58)
1st Serve %
48% ( 33 of 69)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
68% ( 27 of 40)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 21 of 33)
39% ( 7 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 14 of 36)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
41% ( 24 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 34 of 69)
68
Total Points Won
59
L
4-6 6-1 2-0 ret. H2H
F
cross
Elise Mertens
Player
Ann Li
75% ( 39 of 52)
1st Serve %
55% ( 32 of 58)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
74% ( 29 of 39)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 19 of 32)
54% ( 7 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 10 of 26)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
20% ( 1 of 5)
31% ( 16 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 29 of 58)
65
Total Points Won
45
L
6-1 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
Ann Li
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
69% ( 27 of 39)
1st Serve %
73% ( 43 of 59)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
85% ( 23 of 27)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 24 of 43)
25% ( 3 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 7 of 16)
29% ( 2 of 7)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
33% ( 13 of 39)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 28 of 59)
54
Total Points Won
44
W
7-6(2) 1-0 ret. H2H
QF
cross
Ann Li
Player
Kimberly Birrell
63% ( 52 of 83)
1st Serve %
65% ( 48 of 74)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
71% ( 37 of 52)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 35 of 48)
58% ( 18 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 8 of 26)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
67% ( 4 of 6)
34% ( 28 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 31 of 74)
86
Total Points Won
71
W
7-6(2) 7-6(4) H2H
R2
cross
Ann Li
Player
Maria Timofeeva
55% ( 26 of 47)
1st Serve %
70% ( 38 of 54)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
88% ( 23 of 26)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 22 of 38)
62% ( 13 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 7 of 16)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
23% ( 11 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 25 of 54)
61
Total Points Won
40
W
6-3 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Ann Li
Player
Daria Saville
55% ( 30 of 55)
1st Serve %
64% ( 27 of 42)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
70% ( 21 of 30)
1st Serve Won
52% ( 14 of 27)
52% ( 13 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 5 of 15)
83% ( 5 of 6)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
38% ( 21 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 23 of 42)
57
Total Points Won
40
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Madison Keys
Player
Ann Li
71% ( 44 of 62)
1st Serve %
74% ( 45 of 61)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73% ( 32 of 44)
1st Serve Won
73% ( 33 of 45)
56% ( 10 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 5 of 16)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
32% ( 20 of 62)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 23 of 61)
65
Total Points Won
58
L
6-4 7-5 H2H
R2
cross
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Ann Li
69% ( 67 of 97)
1st Serve %
62% ( 67 of 108)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
55% ( 37 of 67)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 36 of 67)
47% ( 14 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 18 of 41)
43% ( 6 of 14)
Break Points Won
55% ( 6 of 11)
47% ( 46 of 97)
Rtn Points Won
50% ( 54 of 108)
105
Total Points Won
100
L
1-6 7-5 6-2 H2H
R1
cross
Ann Li
Player
Sloane Stephens
60% ( 34 of 57)
1st Serve %
73% ( 48 of 66)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
82% ( 28 of 34)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 27 of 48)
48% ( 11 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
28% ( 5 of 18)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
32% ( 18 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 34 of 66)
73
Total Points Won
50
W
7-5 6-1 H2H

Eva Lys Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
Q1
cross
Eva Lys
Player
Petra Martic
78% ( 58 of 74)
1st Serve %
58% ( 41 of 71)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
66% ( 38 of 58)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 22 of 41)
38% ( 6 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 13 of 30)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
41% ( 30 of 74)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 36 of 71)
80
Total Points Won
65
W
7-5 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Caroline Dolehide
Player
Eva Lys
71% ( 49 of 69)
1st Serve %
67% ( 55 of 82)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
76% ( 37 of 49)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 36 of 55)
55% ( 11 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 10 of 27)
22% ( 2 of 9)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
30% ( 21 of 69)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 36 of 82)
84
Total Points Won
67
L
7-6(3) 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Jule Niemeier
Player
Eva Lys
65% ( 33 of 51)
1st Serve %
58% ( 38 of 65)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
64% ( 21 of 33)
1st Serve Won
47% ( 18 of 38)
39% ( 7 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 9 of 27)
78% ( 7 of 9)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
45% ( 23 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 38 of 65)
66
Total Points Won
50
L
6-4 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Eva Lys
Player
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
65% ( 54 of 83)
1st Serve %
71% ( 42 of 59)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
5
70% ( 38 of 54)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 20 of 42)
21% ( 6 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 7 of 17)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
31% ( 4 of 13)
47% ( 39 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 32 of 59)
76
Total Points Won
66
W
6-4 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Jasmine Paolini
Player
Eva Lys
64% ( 36 of 56)
1st Serve %
56% ( 35 of 62)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67% ( 24 of 36)
1st Serve Won
49% ( 17 of 35)
55% ( 11 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 13 of 27)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
38% ( 21 of 56)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 32 of 62)
67
Total Points Won
51
L
6-2 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Eva Lys
Player
Irina-Camelia Begu
67% ( 71 of 106)
1st Serve %
68% ( 63 of 92)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
68% ( 48 of 71)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 36 of 63)
46% ( 16 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 15 of 29)
86% ( 6 of 7)
Break Points Won
45% ( 5 of 11)
40% ( 42 of 106)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 41 of 92)
105
Total Points Won
93
W
5-7 7-5 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Eva Lys
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
60% ( 28 of 47)
1st Serve %
65% ( 42 of 65)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
75% ( 21 of 28)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 25 of 42)
47% ( 9 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
26% ( 6 of 23)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
36% ( 17 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 34 of 65)
64
Total Points Won
48
W
6-1 6-3 H2H
Q1
cross
Eva Lys
Player
Ann Li
69% ( 40 of 58)
1st Serve %
48% ( 33 of 69)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
68% ( 27 of 40)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 21 of 33)
39% ( 7 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 14 of 36)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
41% ( 24 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 34 of 69)
68
Total Points Won
59
W
4-6 6-1 2-0 ret. H2H
R1
cross
Petra Martic
Player
Eva Lys
65% ( 66 of 101)
1st Serve %
71% ( 87 of 122)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
64% ( 42 of 66)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 48 of 87)
51% ( 18 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
49% ( 17 of 35)
33% ( 6 of 18)
Break Points Won
36% ( 4 of 11)
41% ( 41 of 101)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 57 of 122)
117
Total Points Won
106
L
6-4 5-7 6-3 H2H
R4
cross
Iga Swiatek
Player
Eva Lys
67% ( 26 of 39)
1st Serve %
68% ( 32 of 47)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
81% ( 21 of 26)
1st Serve Won
38% ( 12 of 32)
69% ( 9 of 13)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 6 of 15)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
23% ( 9 of 39)
Rtn Points Won
62% ( 29 of 47)
59
Total Points Won
27
L
6-0 6-1 H2H
banner

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

60% (238/160)
Win/Loss
61% (154/100)
57% (521/389)
Sets Win/Loss
59% (330/230)
53% (4448/3924)
Games Win/Loss
54% (2699/2328)
60% (134/91)
Hard Win/Loss
64% (51/29)
64% (70/39)
Clay Win/Loss
56% (63/49)
63% (27/16)
Indoor Hard W/L
67% (35/17)
33% (7/14)
Grass Win/Loss
50% (5/5)
0.21
Aces Per Game
0.06
843
Aces Total
139
0.23
Double Faults Per Game
0.34
951
Total Double Faults
845
1:27:49
Average Match Time
1:22:35
356.67
Average Opponent Rank
317.46
60% (15722/25996)
1st Serve %
68% (10441/15296)
63% (9970/15722)
1st Serve Win %
59% (6109/10441)
47% (4861/10274)
2nd Serve Win %
44% (2159/4855)
48% (1529/3170)
Break Points Won % (Total)
50% (1037/2073)
45% (11606/25565)
Return Points Win %
48% (7276/15032)
45% (19/23)
Slam W/L
68% (26/12)
44% (11/14)
Masters W/L
56% (10/8)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
50% (1/1)
62% (46/28)
Main Tour W/L
57% (25/19)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
63% (153/91)
Challenger W/L
60% (70/47)
69% (9/4)
Futures W/L
63% (22/13)
60% (231/388)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
61% (148/241)
33% (1/3)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
100% (1/1)
54% (44/81)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
62% (24/39)
60% (70/117)
Deciding Set Win %
55% (35/64)
88% (220/193)
1st Set Won, Won Match
88% (153/134)
12% (220/27)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
12% (153/19)
25% (178/45)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
18% (99/18)

See recent tennis photos of Li and Lys

Other Predictions

Miami Open - Miami

flag
flag
Prediction

Miami Open - Miami

flag
flag
Prediction
  • Loading news...