Prediction of Ann Li vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
60% (234-157)
Career Total W/L
62% (310-189)
57% (4-3)
YTD W/L
100% (4-0)
$1,321,376
Career Prize Money
$1,440,104
0
YTD Titles
0
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Ann Li
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
32 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| stats | Ann Li | Elena Gabriela Ruse |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:0 | 1:30:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (80/135) | 58% (83/143) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (49/80) | 54% (45/83) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (32/55) | 45% (27/60) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (10/22) | 36% (5/14) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (71/143) | 40% (54/135) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ann Li vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Li 2 - 0 Ruse
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Li has won 47.18% of points on their second serve, while Ruse has won 49.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Li, in recent form, has won 54.4% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ruse has won 58.27%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.31% and 37.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Li has saved 53.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ruse has saved 50.62% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Li has won 61.64% of matches played (W/L 45/ 28), with Ruse winning 66.67% (W/L 38/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Li has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 70/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 7/ 14). Ruse has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 164/ 94), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 43/ 31).
- Player level: In the last year, Li has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.22% of matches (W/L 28/ 17), where as Ruse has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 15/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Li winning 2 times and Ruse being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Li winning 4 and Ruse winning 0. The last match between Li and Ruse was at the W100 Bonita Springs, 07-05-2019, First, Clay with Ann Li getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Li and Ruse have played a deciding set 0 times, with Li winning 0 times and Ruse 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Li winning 0, and Ruse 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Li has played against opponents with an average rank of 178.96 while Ruse has played against players with an average rank of 217.51.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Li has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ruse has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Li has converted 45.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ruse has converted 48.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ann Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Keys
Player
Ann Li
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Ann Li
69%
(
67 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
46 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Sloane Stephens
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Suzan Lamens
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Chloe Paquet
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Ann Li
84%
(
56 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Sloane Stephens
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
108)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Astra Sharma
Player
Ann Li
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
109)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
35%
(
15 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
47 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Ann Li
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Polina Kudermetova
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
50%
(
39 of
78)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Elena Gabriela Ruse Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Irina-Camelia Begu
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Emina Bektas
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
73%
(
55 of
75)
7
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
0
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Anna-Lena Friedsam
53%
(
42 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
3
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Leonie Kung
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Blinkova
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
49 of
66)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
32%
(
32 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Ipek Oz
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ajla Tomljanovic
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Qiang Wang
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sijia Wei
Player
Elena Gabriela Ruse
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Li vs Ruse?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Li Vs Ruse is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ann Li | Elena Gabriela Ruse |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (4/3) | 100% (4/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) | 89% (8/1) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (85/75) | 67% (52/26) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 100% (4/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.33 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 13 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 11 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:6 | 1:28:45 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 66.86 | 243.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (327/532) | 55% (128/231) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (222/327) | 74% (95/128) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (99/205) | 57% (59/103) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (26/59) | 50% (19/38) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (230/528) | 48% (125/258) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 100% (4/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (4/7) | 100% (4/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 100% (1/1) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Elena Gabriela Ruse
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
