Prediction of Ann Li vs Daria Snigur Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
60% (234-157)
Career Total W/L
65% (215-116)
57% (4-3)
YTD W/L
50% (3-3)
$1,321,376
Career Prize Money
$709,223
0
YTD Titles
0
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Daria Snigur
Player
Ann Li
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
50%
(
29 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
| stats | Ann Li | Daria Snigur |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 6 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 4 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:13:0 | 1:13:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (38/63) | 79% (46/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 45% (17/38) | 52% (24/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (10/25) | 42% (5/12) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 64% (7/11) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (29/58) | 57% (36/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ann Li vs Daria Snigur Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Li 0 - 1 Snigur
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Li has won 47.18% of points on their second serve, while Snigur has won 39.96%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Li, in recent form, has won 54.4% of their opponent's second serve points, while Snigur has won 58.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.31% and 42.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Li has saved 53.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Snigur has saved 54.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Li has won 61.64% of matches played (W/L 45/ 28), with Snigur winning 63.49% (W/L 40/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Li has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 70/ 39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 7/ 14). Snigur has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 114/ 53), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 15/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Li has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.22% of matches (W/L 28/ 17), where as Snigur has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.22% of matches (W/L 30/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Li winning 0 times and Snigur being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Li winning 0 and Snigur winning 2. The last match between Li and Snigur was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 11-01-2024, Q2 round, Hard with Daria Snigur getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Li and Snigur have played a deciding set 0 times, with Li winning 0 times and Snigur 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Li winning 0, and Snigur 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Li has played against opponents with an average rank of 178.96 while Snigur has played against players with an average rank of 286.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Li has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Snigur has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Li has converted 45.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Snigur has converted 53.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ann Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Keys
Player
Ann Li
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Ann Li
69%
(
67 of
97)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
47%
(
46 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Sloane Stephens
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Suzan Lamens
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Chloe Paquet
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
51 of
81)
4
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Ann Li
84%
(
56 of
67)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Sloane Stephens
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
108)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Astra Sharma
Player
Ann Li
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
109)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
35%
(
15 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
47 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Zeynep Sonmez
Player
Ann Li
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Polina Kudermetova
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
50%
(
39 of
78)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Daria Snigur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Daria Snigur
52%
(
38 of
73)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
37 of
65)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Snigur
Player
Rebeka Masarova
84%
(
53 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daria Snigur
Player
Barbora Palicova
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
42%
(
14 of
33)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
47%
(
15 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
37
Total Points Won
28
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Daria Snigur
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
42%
(
14 of
33)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
47%
(
15 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
37
Total Points Won
28
|
3-6 0-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daria Snigur
Player
Emiliana Arango
84%
(
78 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
95)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
20%
(
3 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
48%
(
45 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
48 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Daria Snigur
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
30%
(
8 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Daria Snigur
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Snigur
Player
Ekaterina Yashina
48%
(
29 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Li vs Snigur?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Li Vs Snigur is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ann Li | Daria Snigur |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (4/3) | 50% (3/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) | 64% (9/5) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (85/75) | 55% (65/54) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.03 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.37 |
| DFs Total | 11 | 22 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:6 | 1:24:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 66.86 | 136 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (327/532) | 71% (280/392) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (222/327) | 60% (169/280) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (99/205) | 36% (40/112) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (26/59) | 52% (24/46) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (230/528) | 47% (178/377) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 60% (3/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (4/7) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (4/2) | 33% (3/1) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
