C. V. Zonneveld
To Win
M. Hageman
To Win
Anja Stankovic vs Madelief Hageman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W L W W L L
Form
W W L L W L W W W LHead-To-Head: Stankovic 2 - 1 Hageman
They have played 7 sets in total, with Stankovic winning 5 and Hageman winning 2. The last match between Stankovic and Hageman was at the W15 Kursumlijska Banja, 09-05-2025, Round: Quarterfinals, Surface: Clay, with Anja Stankovic getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anja Stankovic | 2 |
| Madelief Hageman | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W15 Kursumlijska Banja(09-05-2025)
Anja Stankovic
Madelief Hageman
6
3
6
2
| Stankovic | Stats | Hageman |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (18-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 48% (13-14) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 540 | Ranking | 812 |
| 427 | Highest Rank | 812 |
| 20 | Age | 22 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 63% (108-63) | Career Total W/L | 49% (119-122) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Vukic VS Duckworth PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
24 Jun 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Evans VS Paul PREDICTION Grass
Rothesay International - Eastbourne atp
25 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Anja Stankovic
Player
Madelief Hageman
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
7 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
38
Total Points Won
29
|
||||
| 6-1 6-3 | |||||
| 6-2 6-7(6) 6-3 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Anja Stankovic
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
40%
(
43 of
108)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
11
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
57 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 36 | Games Won | 27 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:4:14 | Average Match Time | 1:4:14 |
| 45% (61/136) | 1st Serve % | 60% (81/136) |
| 74% (45/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (50/81) |
| 36% (27/75) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (26/55) |
| 44% (8/18) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (9/17) |
| 44% (60/136) | Return Points Win % | 47% (64/136) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Stankovic vs Hageman Match Preview :
- Recent second serve performance highlights a slight edge for Hageman, winning 39.49% of points versus Stankovic's 38.61%. Could this tiny margin make a difference in the match?
- In return games, Hageman narrowly leads in winning opponent's second serve points, with 50.62% compared to Stankovic's 50.57%, indicating a marginal advantage in returns.
- Stankovic exhibits greater resilience under pressure, saving 53.44% of breakpoints compared to Hageman's 47.13%, which is critical for clutch situations.
- Performance over the past year shows Stankovic with a superior win rate of 63.29%, significantly higher than Hageman's 43.14%, showcasing more consistent results.
- Both players favor clay surfaces, though Stankovic excels with a 65% win rate versus Hageman's 51%, suggesting a clay advantage for Stankovic.
- Stankovic outshines Hageman in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 67.19% against Hageman's 43.9%, indicating a better form at this level.
- Head-to-head matches are tied, with each player winning once. However, in their last clay encounter, Stankovic emerged victorious decisively.
- In extreme pressure, Stankovic has a slight advantage, winning their only tiebreak against Hageman.
- Hageman plays against slightly higher-ranked opponents on average but lacks the same winning momentum as Stankovic does in deciding sets (69% for Stankovic and 53% for Hageman).
- Break point conversion percentages are similar, with Hageman converting 42.62% and Stankovic 41.51%, indicating competitive opportunities on serve breaks.
Editorial Prediction (May 9, 2025, UTC):
Examining recent performances and head-to-head comparisons, Stankovic appears to maintain a slight but consistent edge over Hageman. They both show strength on clay, yet Stankovic's superior win rate on this surface and recent decisive victory on clay suggest a strong form in such conditions.
While Hageman battles slightly tougher opponents, Stankovic's resilience under pressure, stronger breakpoint saves, and better performance at similar competition levels further tip the balance in her favor. These factors collectively give Stankovic a potential advantage, despite Hageman's marginal gains in second-serve performance.
Considering all these aspects, Stankovic is the likely winner for the upcoming match, with a slight edge stemming from her overall consistency and ability to handle pressure.
Stankovic vs Hageman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Anja Stankovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Antonia Vergara Rivera
Player
Anja Stankovic
74%
(
83 of
112)
1st Serve %
44%
(
40 of
90)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
45 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucie Havlickova
Player
Anja Stankovic
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Isabella Svahn
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Aleksandra Stevanovic
44%
(
21 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Zolotareva
Player
Anja Stankovic
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
46%
(
50 of
109)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
5
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
109)
104
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Ekaterina Ovcharenko
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
5
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
6
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Anja Stankovic
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
33 of
69)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
8
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
21%
(
4 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
9 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
52%
(
26 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Darya Astakhova
Player
Anja Stankovic
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve %
53%
(
10 of
19)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
18%
(
2 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
43%
(
12 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
29
Total Points Won
18
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Madelief Hageman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Johanne Svendsen
Player
Madelief Hageman
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Ania Hertel
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Annemarie Lazar
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve %
52%
(
17 of
33)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
52%
(
11 of
21)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
13 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
34
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Anna Kmiecik
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
91
Total Points Won
73
|
6-7(2) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ioana Teodora Sava
Player
Madelief Hageman
58%
(
57 of
98)
1st Serve %
77%
(
65 of
84)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
50%
(
49 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madelief Hageman
Player
Paula Ormaechea
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
57)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcelina Podlinska
Player
Madelief Hageman
78%
(
78 of
100)
1st Serve %
79%
(
91 of
115)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
46%
(
36 of
78)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
54%
(
54 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
59 of
115)
105
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nadia Kulbiej
Player
Madelief Hageman
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
79%
(
68 of
86)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (108/63) | Win/Loss | 49% (119/122) |
| 58% (232/166) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (269/285) |
| 53% (1940/1735) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (2619/2514) |
| 50% (2/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 37% (11/19) |
| 64% (106/60) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (107/102) |
| 0% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 513 | Aces Total | 162 |
| 0.37 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 665 | Total Double Faults | 500 |
| 1:26:55 | Average Match Time | 1:17:48 |
| 442.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 332.44 |
| 48% (4970/10398) | 1st Serve % | 65% (7439/11441) |
| 66% (3289/4970) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (4199/7439) |
| 46% (2530/5441) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1746/4002) |
| 46% (606/1323) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (737/1506) |
| 46% (4697/10268) | Return Points Win % | 47% (5340/11276) |
| 45% (19/23) | Challenger W/L | 24% (6/19) |
| 69% (89/40) | Futures W/L | 52% (113/103) |
| 63% (106/168) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (119/241) |
| 68% (21/31) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 15% (6/40) |
| 70% (42/60) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (41/72) |
| 90% (96/86) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (112/98) |
| 10% (96/10) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (112/14) |
| 30% (74/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (129/21) |
Stankovic vs. Hageman Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
