Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anirudh Chandrasekar vs Julian Ocleppo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chandrasekar vs Ocleppo analysis and find out who is favored!
Anirudh Chandrasekar vs Julian Ocleppo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chandrasekar has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ocleppo has won 56.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chandrasekar, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ocleppo has won 42.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 38.49% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chandrasekar has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ocleppo has saved 72.97% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chandrasekar has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Ocleppo winning 68.29% (W/L 28/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chandrasekar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 40/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4). Ocleppo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 61/ 39), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 46% (W/L 13/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Chandrasekar has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Ocleppo has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 80.77% of matches (W/L 21/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chandrasekar winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chandrasekar winning 0 and Ocleppo winning 2. The last match between Chandrasekar and Ocleppo was at the Bengalaru Challenger, 11-02-2020, First, Hard with Julian Ocleppo getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:56:45.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chandrasekar and Ocleppo have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chandrasekar winning 0 times and Ocleppo 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chandrasekar winning 0, and Ocleppo 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chandrasekar has played against opponents with an average rank of 311 while Ocleppo has played against players with an average rank of 289.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chandrasekar has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ocleppo has won 78% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chandrasekar has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ocleppo has converted 38.46% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chandrasekar 0 - 1 Ocleppo
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
L
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
471
Rank
309
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
43% (76-102)
Career Total W/L
54% (182-157)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$7,255
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chandrasekar VS Ocleppo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Anirudh Chandrasekar | Julian Ocleppo |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 3 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:56:45 | 0:56:45 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (37/63) | 56% (20/36) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (21/37) | 95% (19/20) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 35% (9/26) | 56% (9/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/12) |
| Return Points W% | 22% (8/36) | 52% (33/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Chandrasekar VS Ocleppo H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
7
95%
(
19 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anirudh Chandrasekar | Julian Ocleppo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Anirudh Chandrasekar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
7 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Digvijaypratap Singh
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manish Sureshkumar
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karunuday Singh
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Julian Ocleppo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Alexis Gautier
Player
Julian Ocleppo
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
33 of
75)
85
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Aziz Ouakaa
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
80%
(
57 of
71)
8
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Laurent Lokoli
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Matej Dodig
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Erik Arutiunian
Player
Julian Ocleppo
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Julian Ocleppo
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Julian Ocleppo
68%
(
75 of
110)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
104)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
44 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
104)
114
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Roman Andres Burruchaga
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
42)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Julian Ocleppo
Player
Federico Iannaccone
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Chandrasekar Vs Ocleppo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
