Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Anirudh Chandrasekar vs Damien Wenger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chandrasekar vs Wenger analysis and find out who is favored!
Anirudh Chandrasekar vs Damien Wenger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chandrasekar has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Wenger has won 49.85%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chandrasekar, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wenger has won 54.61%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 36.53% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chandrasekar has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wenger has saved 56.91% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chandrasekar has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Wenger winning 63.51% (W/L 47/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chandrasekar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 44% (W/L 40/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4). Wenger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 238/ 121), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Chandrasekar has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Wenger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.58% of matches (W/L 31/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chandrasekar winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chandrasekar winning 0 and Wenger winning 2. The last match between Chandrasekar and Wenger was at the M15 Cairo, 08-12-2020, Q3, Clay with Damien Wenger getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:38:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chandrasekar and Wenger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chandrasekar winning 0 times and Wenger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chandrasekar winning 0, and Wenger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chandrasekar has played against opponents with an average rank of 311 while Wenger has played against players with an average rank of 270.05.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chandrasekar has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wenger has won 56% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chandrasekar has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wenger has converted 45.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chandrasekar 0 - 1 Wenger
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
L
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
376
Rank
363
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
43% (76-102)
Career Total W/L
64% (249-138)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
60% (12-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chandrasekar VS Wenger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Anirudh Chandrasekar | Damien Wenger |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 1 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:38:0 | 0:38:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 47% (9/19) | 65% (22/34) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 22% (2/9) | 77% (17/22) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (4/10) | 50% (6/12) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (11/34) | 68% (13/19) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Chandrasekar VS Wenger H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 1-0 ret. |
Stats 
Damien Wenger
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
47%
(
9 of
19)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
11 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
36
Total Points Won
17
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anirudh Chandrasekar | Damien Wenger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (12/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (26/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (223/197) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (12/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 16 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 62 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:57:23 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 355.3 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (800/1315) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (504/800) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (262/515) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 46% (79/172) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (632/1401) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (9/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 90% (10/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 30% (10/3) |
Anirudh Chandrasekar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
7 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
6
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Digvijaypratap Singh
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manish Sureshkumar
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karunuday Singh
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Damien Wenger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Damien Wenger
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Damien Wenger
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Anton Matusevich
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
62)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Clement Tabur
Player
Damien Wenger
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Daniel Cukierman
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
96)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
9
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
1-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Aziz Ouakaa
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Damien Wenger
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
18 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Luca Fantini
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
31 of
57)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Damien Wenger
72%
(
76 of
105)
1st Serve %
71%
(
68 of
96)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
41%
(
43 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
101
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(2) 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Chandrasekar Vs Wenger Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
