Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Angelique Kerber vs Qiang Wang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kerber vs Wang analysis and find out who is favored!
Angelique Kerber vs Qiang Wang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kerber has won 42.21% of points on his second serve, while Wang has won 40.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kerber, in recent form, has won 58.93% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wang has won 47.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.36% and 46.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kerber has saved 57.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wang has saved 55.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kerber has won 30.77% of matches played (W/L 4/ 9), with Wang winning 66.67% (W/L 4/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kerber has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 87/ 32), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 116/ 91). Wang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 301/ 185), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 35/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Kerber has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 14.29% of matches (W/L 1/ 6), where as Wang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 80% of matches (W/L 4/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kerber winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kerber winning 2 and Wang winning 0. The last match between Kerber and Wang was at the Adelaide International - Adelaide, 13-01-2020, First, Hard with Angelique Kerber getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:22:28.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kerber and Wang have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kerber winning 0 times and Wang 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kerber winning 0, and Wang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kerber has played against opponents with an average rank of 43 while Wang has played against players with an average rank of 163.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kerber has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wang has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kerber has converted 38.6% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wang has converted 45.61% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kerber 1 - 0 Wang
332
Rank
1
High
36
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
806
Rank
12
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
64% (653-369)
Career Total W/L
59% (405-278)
31% (4-9)
YTD W/L
67% (4-2)
$23,444,100
Career Prize Money
$3,853,637
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Angelique Kerber | Qiang Wang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:22:28 | 1:22:28 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (35/56) | 68% (51/75) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (21/35) | 49% (25/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 71% (15/21) | 38% (9/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (41/75) | 36% (20/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Angelique Kerber
Player
Qiang Wang
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Angelique Kerber | Qiang Wang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 31% (4/9) | 67% (4/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (10/20) | 69% (9/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 42% (111/156) | 55% (64/53) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 67% (4/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 10 | 15 |
| DFs per game | 0.31 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:3 | 1:38:11 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 43 | 163.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (661/950) | 64% (245/385) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (362/661) | 64% (158/245) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (122/289) | 41% (57/140) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (44/114) | 46% (26/57) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (398/918) | 47% (189/401) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 14% (1/6) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 31% (4/13) | 67% (4/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 80% (5/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 20% (5/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (1/0) |
Angelique Kerber Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Raducanu
Player
Angelique Kerber
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
4 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Angelique Kerber
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Caroline Wozniacki
Player
Angelique Kerber
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
53 of
70)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Angelique Kerber
Player
Veronika Kudermetova
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
37 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
78
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Angelique Kerber
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
58%
(
62 of
106)
1st Serve %
54%
(
62 of
114)
3
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
12
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
14 of
52)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
45%
(
48 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
60 of
114)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Angelique Kerber
Player
Petra Martic
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Angelique Kerber
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Angelique Kerber
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
59 of
84)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
29%
(
9 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Iga Swiatek
Player
Angelique Kerber
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Angelique Kerber
Player
Ajla Tomljanovic
79%
(
78 of
99)
1st Serve %
71%
(
82 of
116)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
47 of
82)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
59 of
116)
112
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Qiang Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Wushuang Zheng
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
En Shuo Liang
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
44
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Han Shi
Player
Qiang Wang
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
75 of
120)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
120)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Lanlana Tararudee
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
46%
(
39 of
85)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Shutong Qu
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xiyu Wang
Player
Qiang Wang
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Qiang Wang
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Qiang Wang
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Yanina Wickmayer
80%
(
88 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
51%
(
45 of
88)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
52%
(
57 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Qiang Wang
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
50%
(
39 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
47 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Kerber Vs Wang Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Qiang Wang
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
