Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Andrey Chepelev vs Tim Handel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chepelev vs Handel analysis and find out who is favored!
Andrey Chepelev vs Tim Handel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chepelev has won 43.18% of points on his second serve, while Handel has won 49.73%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chepelev, in recent form, has won 54.33% of his opponent's second serve points, while Handel has won 48.36%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.02% and 34.6% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chepelev has saved 56.3% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Handel has saved 66.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chepelev has won 64.71% of matches played (W/L 55/ 30), with Handel winning 64.2% (W/L 52/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chepelev has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 382/ 243), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5). Handel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 113/ 60), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 13/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Chepelev has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65% of matches (W/L 52/ 28), where as Handel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.21% of matches (W/L 47/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chepelev winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chepelev winning 0 and Handel winning 2. The last match between Chepelev and Handel was at the M15 Antalya, 28-10-2022, Quarterfinals, Clay with Tim Handel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:58:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chepelev and Handel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chepelev winning 0 times and Handel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chepelev winning 0, and Handel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chepelev has played against opponents with an average rank of 188.74 while Handel has played against players with an average rank of 227.54.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chepelev has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Handel has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chepelev has converted 49.35% of breakpoint opportunities, and Handel has converted 39.57% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chepelev 0 - 1 Handel
509
Rank
339
High
25
Age
L
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
370
Rank
363
High
27
Age
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
60% (390-256)
Career Total W/L
60% (162-107)
38% (3-5)
YTD W/L
56% (9-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Andrey Chepelev | Tim Handel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 8 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:0 | 1:58:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (45/66) | 55% (38/69) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (25/45) | 79% (30/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (14/21) | 55% (17/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (22/69) | 41% (27/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Tim Handel
Player
Andrey Chepelev
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Andrey Chepelev | Tim Handel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 38% (3/5) | 56% (9/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (7/10) | 54% (19/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (68/74) | 50% (173/171) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 67% (4/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.03 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 2 | 62 |
| DFs per game | 0.47 | 0.32 |
| DFs Total | 33 | 54 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:15 | 1:45:7 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 122.81 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (293/454) | 60% (684/1145) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (179/293) | 71% (483/684) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (69/161) | 48% (223/461) |
| BPs Won% Total | 56% (24/43) | 37% (39/106) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (181/428) | 38% (432/1135) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Futures W/L | 38% (3/5) | 64% (7/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (3/8) | 56% (9/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 88% (8/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 13% (8/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 25% (8/2) |
Andrey Chepelev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jiri Barnat
Player
Andrey Chepelev
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
38%
(
19 of
50)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
11
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Markus Molder
Player
Andrey Chepelev
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
David Fix
Player
Andrey Chepelev
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Timofei Derepasko
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deney Wassermann
Player
Andrey Chepelev
49%
(
34 of
70)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Samuil Konov
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Calvano
Player
Andrey Chepelev
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve %
61%
(
14 of
23)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
92%
(
12 of
13)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
31
Total Points Won
8
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Ghouse Ali Faisal
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julio Cesar Porras
Player
Andrey Chepelev
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
24%
(
15 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
50
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Joris Moret
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tim Handel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alibek Kachmazov
Player
Tim Handel
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
13
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Samuel Brosset
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
62 of
114)
9
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
29%
(
24 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
114)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Tristan Berard
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
4
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
19 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
85
Total Points Won
70
|
6-2 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Vilius Gaubas
Player
Tim Handel
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Nino Serdarusic
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
60 of
87)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
87)
87
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Emilien Voisin
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Louroi Martinez
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Merida Aguilar
Player
Tim Handel
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
25%
(
15 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Handel
Player
Mika Lipp
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Tim Handel
64%
(
71 of
111)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
23
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
3
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
48 of
63)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
35 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
109
Total Points Won
104
|
6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chepelev Vs Handel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
