Andreas Seppi vs Liam Broady Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Head-To-Head
2 - 0
53% (660-594)
Career Total W/L
57% (478-358)
0% (0-0)
Win/Loss
60% (3-2)
$6,349,978
Career Prize Money
$1,004,050
0
YTD Titles
0
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Andreas Seppi
Player
Liam Broady
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 6-3 |
Stats
Andreas Seppi
Player
Liam Broady
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
| stats | Andreas Seppi | Liam Broady |
|---|---|---|
| H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 6 |
| Total Double Faults | 4 | 4 |
| Average Match Time | 1:17:14 | 1:17:14 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (66/106) | 63% (76/120) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 80% (53/66) | 57% (43/76) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (19/40) | 41% (18/44) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (8/21) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points Win % | 49% (59/120) | 32% (34/106) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Andreas Seppi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Andreas Seppi
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
5
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikael Ymer
Player
Andreas Seppi
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
42 of
76)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
Player
Andreas Seppi
52%
(
51 of
99)
1st Serve %
54%
(
49 of
90)
13
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Seppi
Player
Alexander Donski
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
2
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Andreas Seppi
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Andreas Seppi
Player
Vasek Pospisil
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
56 of
102)
4
Aces
16
5
Double Faults
9
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
97
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Seppi
Player
Flavio Cobolli
52%
(
51 of
99)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Andreas Seppi
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Liam Broady Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Daniil Glinka
77%
(
55 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Toby Martin
70%
(
72 of
103)
1st Serve %
59%
(
67 of
114)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
114)
112
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Liam Broady
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
65 of
96)
15
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
53 of
65)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
0%
(
0 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Liam Broady
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
73 of
110)
10
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Cem Ilkel
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yi Zhou
Player
Liam Broady
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Alexey Zakharov
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
61 of
100)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Federico Bondioli
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Ewen Lumsden
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Andreas Seppi | Liam Broady |
|---|---|---|
| Win/Loss | 53% (660/594) | 57% (478/358) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (1630/1566) | 56% (1084/854) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (15750/15420) | 52% (9589/8692) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 48% (171/186) | 62% (252/154) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 52% (232/212) | 53% (68/60) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (173/139) | 59% (126/87) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 60% (84/57) | 36% (32/57) |
| Aces Per Game | 0.31 | 0.26 |
| Aces Total | 4747 | 2318 |
| Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 | 0.16 |
| Total Double Faults | 2550 | 1457 |
| Average Match Time | 1st Match | 1:12:21 |
| Average Opponent Rank | 94.17 | 181.4 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (43004/74172) | 63% (27657/44021) |
| 1st Serve Win % | 71% (30561/42986) | 68% (18824/27657) |
| 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (15710/31149) | 52% (8482/16357) |
| Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (2781/6788) | 42% (1807/4261) |
| Return Points Win % | 38% (28339/74643) | 39% (17138/43439) |
| Slam W/L | 51% (80/76) | 47% (26/29) |
| Masters W/L | 47% (103/117) | 56% (9/7) |
| Cups W/L | 43% (20/26) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 51% (291/276) | 46% (40/47) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (163/96) | 56% (226/180) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 65% (175/93) |
| Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (569/1073) | 58% (468/809) |
| Best of 5 Sets Win % | 49% (81/166) | 35% (6/17) |
| Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (236/500) | 52% (132/256) |
| Deciding Set Win % | 55% (246/444) | 52% (131/252) |
| 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (598/501) | 86% (469/405) |
| 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (598/97) | 13% (469/63) |
| 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (656/159) | 20% (365/73) |
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
