Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Andreas Haider-Maurer vs Ben Patael Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Haider-Maurer vs Patael analysis and find out who is favored!
Andreas Haider-Maurer vs Ben Patael Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Haider-Maurer has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Patael has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Haider-Maurer, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Patael has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Haider-Maurer has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Patael has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Haider-Maurer has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Patael winning 33.33% (W/L 2/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Haider-Maurer has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 325/ 199), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 35% (W/L 7/ 13). Patael has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 212/ 133), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Haider-Maurer winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Haider-Maurer winning 2 and Patael winning 0. The last match between Haider-Maurer and Patael was at the Banja Luka Challenger, 10-09-2017, Q2 round, Clay with Andreas Haider-Maurer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:3:18.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Haider-Maurer and Patael have played a deciding set 0 times, with Haider-Maurer winning 0 times and Patael 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Haider-Maurer winning 0, and Patael 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Haider-Maurer has played against opponents with an average rank of while Patael has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Haider-Maurer has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Patael has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Haider-Maurer has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Patael has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Haider-Maurer 1 - 0 Patael
Ret.
Rank
47
High
37
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
809
Rank
379
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
57% (447-336)
Career Total W/L
59% (256-181)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$723,565
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Haider-Maurer VS Patael H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Andreas Haider-Maurer | Ben Patael |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:3:18 | 1:3:18 |
| 1st Serve % | 38% (21/56) | 59% (24/41) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (16/21) | 50% (12/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (21/35) | 41% (7/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (22/41) | 34% (19/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Haider-Maurer VS Patael H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Ben Patael
38%
(
21 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Andreas Haider-Maurer | Ben Patael |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Andreas Haider-Maurer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Andrea Vavassori
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
72)
2
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
3
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Mikhail Balmashev
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
48 of
76)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alen Avidzba
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
51%
(
42 of
83)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
4
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
9
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
34 of
39)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Arthur De Greef
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve %
49%
(
17 of
35)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
9 of
13)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
45%
(
9 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
31
Total Points Won
24
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
48%
(
37 of
77)
4
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
24%
(
17 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
George Von Massow
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
42%
(
35 of
84)
12
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
29 of
35)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
29 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Haider-Maurer
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
53 of
101)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
12
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
38%
(
18 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
George Von Massow
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
58%
(
45 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
10
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
25 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jonathan Kanar
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
65%
(
84 of
130)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
121)
4
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
7
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
42%
(
54 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
54 of
121)
130
Total Points Won
121
|
5-7 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Ben Patael Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Amit Vales
Player
Ben Patael
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
1
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
67
|
5-7 6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ofek Shimanov
Player
Ben Patael
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Joshua Luck
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tuncay Duran
Player
Ben Patael
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Jonathan Baron
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Ferrari
Player
Ben Patael
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Denisov
Player
Ben Patael
46%
(
21 of
46)
1st Serve %
76%
(
28 of
37)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
45
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yunseok Jang
Player
Ben Patael
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ben Patael
Player
Shivank Bhatnagar
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Ben Patael
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Haider-Maurer Vs Patael Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
