F. Maestrelli
To Win
D. Lajovic
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W W W W WForm
W W W L L L W L W WThey have played 5 sets in total, with Pellegrino winning 4 and Lajovic winning 1. The last match between Pellegrino and Lajovic was at the Estoril Challenger, 30-04-2025, Round: First, Surface: Clay, with Andrea Pellegrino getting the victory 7-5 6-7(2) 6-3.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Andrea Pellegrino | 2 |
Dusan Lajovic | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Estoril Challenger(30-04-2025)
Pellegrino | Stats | Lajovic |
---|---|---|
69% (25-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (20-20) |
2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
136 | Ranking | 137 |
136 | Highest Rank | 23 |
28 | Age | 34 |
R | Plays | R |
9 | Titles | 14 |
53% (305-272) | Career Total W/L | 54% (537-464) |
$190,420 | Career Prize Money | $4,963,415 |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
19 Jun 2025 / Quarterfinals
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-7(2) 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Dusan Lajovic
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
102)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
6-4 7-6(0) |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Dusan Lajovic
63%
(
56 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
87)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 1 |
32 | Games Won | 25 |
3 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
9 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
2:11:17 | Average Match Time | 2:11:17 |
64% (123/192) | 1st Serve % | 65% (122/189) |
65% (80/123) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (69/122) |
55% (38/69) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (36/67) |
45% (10/22) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 35% (7/20) |
44% (84/189) | Return Points Win % | 39% (74/192) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
In the ever-entertaining world of tennis, where a fuzzy yellow ball decides one's fate, Pellegrino and Lajovic are all set to face off. Now, let's delve into the art of second serves, where Pellegrino has mastered the technique at 44.41%, ever-so-slightly nudging past Lajovic, who's not too far behind with 43.2% in their recent six-month playbook. This statistic is no less than the crystal ball of tennis, revealing all in its mystical numbers.
When it comes to returning serve, Pellegrino again leads the way, winning 41.55% of his opponent's second serve points. With Lajovic almost neck and neck at 41.53%, it's like peeking behind someone in a buffet line — very close! First serve returns, however, separate the boys from the men, with Pellegrino grabbing onto 30.7% and Lajovic holding just 27.32%. These stats firmly hint at who might be wearing the cape of victory in this tĂªte-Ă -tĂªte matchup.
Under the fiery microscope of pressure, both players show off some serious gumption. With Lajovic saving 56.44% of breakpoints compared to Pellegrino's 52.48%, we can imagine Lajovic wielding his racket like a wand, casting anti-breakpoint spells. But when it comes to sheer match victories over the past year, Pellegrino emerges with 54.1%, leaving Lajovic trailing at 42.55%. Clearly, Pellegrino is no magician; instead, he’s a match-winning machine!
Both players delightfully dabble on clay, with Lajovic having a slight edge, winning 59%, while Pellegrino thumbs ups 56% of his clay court battles. Though grass, for these two, seems like attempting to sprint on a trampoline, where Lajovic staggers at 19% and Pellegrino follows 1% behind, going 20%. It’s less Wimbledon and more ‘bring your pillows’ party.
In terms of tournament wanderlust, Pellegrino mainly stomps through Challenger terrains winning 57.41% of his matches, while Lajovic prefers the main tour safari, albeit with a 42.11% win record. Curiously, when they cross rackets directly, Pellegrino emerges victorious, laughing diabolically as Lajovic reels from their Genova Challenger defeat: 6-4, 7-6(0).
Their head-to-head tales are nothing short of a soap opera, with Pellegrino claiming all prior sets and tiebreaks. Average match time between them runs like a Hollywood blockbuster, standing robust at 2 hours, 8 minutes, and twenty-four suspense-filled seconds. Worth noting is that Pellegrino charges into deciding sets with a 73% win rate, starkly outpacing Lajovic's 40% pack-a-lunch, double-gruel streak.
Against an impressive average opponent rank of 94.02 for Lajovic and a rank hugging 258.03 for Pellegrino, it's clear Lajovic tangoes with higher-ranked players. However, it remains to be seen how rankings hold up against pure grit and determination. In a clincher, Pellegrino profits from 33.91% of breakpoints, whereas Lajovic breaks through 29.2% of the time. If these stats tell us anything, it’s that Pellegrino is poised to waltz into the winner’s circle. In this upcoming bout, may the best man (or stats-predicted man) win, with Pellegrino seemingly destined for grandeur.
Pellegrino vs Lajovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Nerman Fatic
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
81%
(
51 of
63)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Luca Nardi
72%
(
59 of
82)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Francesco Passaro
81%
(
62 of
77)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Federico Bondioli
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Gabriele Piraino
68%
(
67 of
99)
1st Serve %
67%
(
58 of
86)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
35%
(
35 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Marko Topo
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
11
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
24
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Andrea Pellegrino
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Stefano Napolitano
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
26%
(
18 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Albert Ramos-Vinolas
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Nerman Fatic
Player
Dusan Lajovic
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Rei Sakamoto
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
2
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Dusan Lajovic
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
68%
(
68 of
100)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
34 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Dusan Lajovic
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Dusan Lajovic
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Dusan Lajovic
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
29 of
55)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
53% (305/272) | Win/Loss | 54% (537/464) |
52% (706/645) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1281/1147) |
50% (6378/6297) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (11936/11477) |
39% (16/25) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (116/120) |
56% (262/204) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (346/241) |
40% (26/39) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47% (69/78) |
20% (1/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 19% (6/25) |
0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
1323 | Aces Total | 3017 |
0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
1503 | Total Double Faults | 1414 |
1:34:39 | Average Match Time | 1:22:2 |
460.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 476.1 |
63% (23802/37688) | 1st Serve % | 66% (40631/61919) |
65% (15590/23802) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (27792/40631) |
51% (7029/13886) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (11157/21288) |
43% (1633/3790) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (2250/5632) |
40% (15064/37583) | Return Points Win % | 38% (23275/61866) |
24% (4/13) | Slam W/L | 39% (33/52) |
20% (1/4) | Masters W/L | 51% (82/78) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 47% (18/20) |
33% (8/16) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (176/185) |
51% (196/189) | Challenger W/L | 64% (138/77) |
66% (96/50) | Futures W/L | 64% (90/51) |
53% (302/567) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (493/897) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 39% (34/88) |
52% (87/168) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (169/342) |
52% (106/202) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (158/311) |
82% (300/245) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (567/472) |
18% (300/54) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (567/94) |
21% (276/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (434/61) |