Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Andrea Gamiz vs Tena Lukas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gamiz vs Lukas analysis and find out who is favored!
Andrea Gamiz vs Tena Lukas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gamiz has won 17.65% of points on his second serve, while Lukas has won 42.99%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gamiz, in recent form, has won 36.36% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lukas has won 57.94%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.77% and 42.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gamiz has saved 28.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lukas has saved 48.07% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gamiz has won 27.78% of matches played (W/L 5/ 13), with Lukas winning 62.03% (W/L 49/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gamiz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 367/ 263), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 31% (W/L 5/ 11). Lukas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 382/ 235), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Gamiz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 27.27% of matches (W/L 3/ 8), where as Lukas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.82% of matches (W/L 49/ 29). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gamiz winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gamiz winning 0 and Lukas winning 2. The last match between Gamiz and Lukas was at the Bukfurdo, 24-08-2016, First, Clay with Tena Lukas getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:57:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gamiz and Lukas have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gamiz winning 0 times and Lukas 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gamiz winning 0, and Lukas 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gamiz has played against opponents with an average rank of 264.67 while Lukas has played against players with an average rank of 262.3.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gamiz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lukas has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gamiz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lukas has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gamiz 0 - 1 Lukas
855
Rank
244
High
31
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
212
Rank
200
High
28
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
56% (439-338)
Career Total W/L
58% (421-305)
40% (2-3)
YTD W/L
67% (14-7)
$16,320
Career Prize Money
$31,490
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Andrea Gamiz | Tena Lukas |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 10 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:0 | 1:57:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 78% (69/88) | 41% (31/75) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 51% (35/69) | 68% (21/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (9/19) | 50% (22/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 36% (4/11) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (32/75) | 50% (44/88) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-6(2) |
Stats 
Tena Lukas
Player
Andrea Gamiz
41%
(
31 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
69 of
88)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Andrea Gamiz | Tena Lukas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (2/3) | 65% (13/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 63% (30/18) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (39/47) | 53% (228/200) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 68% (13/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 38 |
| DFs per game | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 123 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:44:19 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 184.4 | 243.95 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (30/47) | 59% (829/1407) |
| 1st Serve W% | 50% (15/30) | 60% (494/829) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 18% (3/17) | 43% (249/578) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/2) | 57% (108/189) |
| Return Pts W% | 32% (16/50) | 50% (682/1372) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 68% (13/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 65% (13/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 38% (8/3) |
Andrea Gamiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Andrea Gamiz
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Andrea Gamiz
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
6
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Andrea Gamiz
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
82%
(
75 of
91)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Andrea Gamiz
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
86%
(
54 of
63)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Angelica Moratelli
Player
Andrea Gamiz
73%
(
71 of
97)
1st Serve %
80%
(
82 of
102)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sofya Lansere
Player
Andrea Gamiz
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Tena Lukas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Katherine Sebov
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Mia Ristic
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
9
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebecca Peterson
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Tara Wurth
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Tena Lukas
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Camilla Rosatello
60%
(
68 of
113)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
109)
2
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
4
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
42%
(
47 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
109)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(0) 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Tena Lukas
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
43 of
70)
84
Total Points Won
56
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Eleni Christofi
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
52 of
71)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuria Brancaccio
Player
Tena Lukas
86%
(
64 of
74)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
93)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
20%
(
2 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
33 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
49 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Gamiz Vs Lukas Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tena Lukas
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
