Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Andrea Gamiz vs Melanie Stokke Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gamiz vs Stokke analysis and find out who is favored!
Andrea Gamiz vs Melanie Stokke Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gamiz has won 17.65% of points on his second serve, while Stokke has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gamiz, in recent form, has won 36.36% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stokke has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.77% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gamiz has saved 28.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stokke has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gamiz has won 27.78% of matches played (W/L 5/ 13), with Stokke winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gamiz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 367/ 263), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 31% (W/L 5/ 11). Stokke has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 197/ 126), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Gamiz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 27.27% of matches (W/L 3/ 8), where as Stokke has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gamiz winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Gamiz winning 4 and Stokke winning 0. The last match between Gamiz and Stokke was at the Valencia, 22-11-2017, First, Clay with Andrea Gamiz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:33:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gamiz and Stokke have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gamiz winning 0 times and Stokke 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gamiz winning 0, and Stokke 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gamiz has played against opponents with an average rank of 264.67 while Stokke has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gamiz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stokke has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gamiz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stokke has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gamiz 2 - 0 Stokke
855
Rank
244
High
31
Age
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
747
Rank
261
High
27
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
56% (439-338)
Career Total W/L
60% (254-168)
40% (2-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$16,320
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Andrea Gamiz | Melanie Stokke |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:33:30 | 0:33:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 90% (35/39) | 78% (40/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (26/35) | 38% (15/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (2/4) | 36% (4/11) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 63% (32/51) | 28% (11/39) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Andrea Gamiz
Player
Melanie Stokke
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve %
78%
(
40 of
51)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
30
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Andrea Gamiz | Melanie Stokke |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (39/47) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.07 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 184.4 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (30/47) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 50% (15/30) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 18% (3/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 32% (16/50) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Andrea Gamiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Andrea Gamiz
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Andrea Gamiz
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
6
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Andrea Gamiz
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
82%
(
75 of
91)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Andrea Gamiz
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
86%
(
54 of
63)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Angelica Moratelli
Player
Andrea Gamiz
73%
(
71 of
97)
1st Serve %
80%
(
82 of
102)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sofya Lansere
Player
Andrea Gamiz
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Melanie Stokke Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Grymalska
Player
Melanie Stokke
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Melanie Stokke
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
49%
(
39 of
80)
1st Serve %
76%
(
54 of
71)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 5-7 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 2-6 7-6(2) 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 3-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tara Wurth
Player
Melanie Stokke
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve %
71%
(
30 of
42)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Georgia Drummy
Player
Melanie Stokke
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
94)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Melanie Stokke
Player
Ayla Aksu
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
41%
(
44 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Melanie Stokke
Player
Magdalena Stoilkovska
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
11
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Kulikova
Player
Melanie Stokke
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Melanie Stokke
Player
Ingrid Martins
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gamiz Vs Stokke Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
