Andrea Gamiz vs Luna Meers Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gamiz vs Meers analysis and find out who is favored!
Andrea Gamiz vs Luna Meers Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gamiz has won 17.65% of points on his second serve, while Meers has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gamiz, in recent form, has won 36.36% of his opponent's second serve points, while Meers has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.77% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gamiz has saved 28.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Meers has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gamiz has won 27.78% of matches played (W/L 5/ 13), with Meers winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gamiz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 367/ 263), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 31% (W/L 5/ 11). Meers has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 15/ 15), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Gamiz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 27.27% of matches (W/L 3/ 8), where as Meers has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gamiz winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gamiz winning 2 and Meers winning 0. The last match between Gamiz and Meers was at the Santa Margherita Di Pula, 10-04-2017, Q2 round, Clay with Andrea Gamiz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gamiz and Meers have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gamiz winning 0 times and Meers 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gamiz winning 0, and Meers 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gamiz has played against opponents with an average rank of 264.67 while Meers has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gamiz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Meers has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gamiz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Meers has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gamiz 1 - 0 Meers
13
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
855
Rank
244
High
31
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
889
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
56% (439-338)
Career Total W/L
49% (58-61)
40% (2-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$16,320
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Andrea Gamiz | Luna Meers |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-0 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Andrea Gamiz | Luna Meers |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (39/47) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.07 | 0 |
DFs Total | 3 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 184.4 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 64% (30/47) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 50% (15/30) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 18% (3/17) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 32% (16/50) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Andrea Gamiz Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Rubber 2 | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | |||
Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Jil Teichmann
Player
Andrea Gamiz
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kimmi Hance
Player
Andrea Gamiz
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
6
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Erika Andreeva
Player
Andrea Gamiz
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
82%
(
75 of
91)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Andrea Gamiz
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
86%
(
54 of
63)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Angelica Moratelli
Player
Andrea Gamiz
73%
(
71 of
97)
1st Serve %
80%
(
82 of
102)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sofya Lansere
Player
Andrea Gamiz
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Luna Meers Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Lina Gjorcheska
Player
Luna Meers
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
54
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Caroline Romeo
Player
Luna Meers
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
13
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Luna Meers
Player
Hala Fouad
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
16 of
29)
6
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
6
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
43%
(
18 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
43
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jade Suvrijn
Player
Luna Meers
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
7
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Kirsten-Andrea Weedon
Player
Luna Meers
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
37%
(
13 of
35)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
18
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
11 of
13)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
47
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Luna Meers
Player
Emma Van Poppel
40%
(
24 of
60)
1st Serve %
42%
(
22 of
52)
11
Aces
0
19
Double Faults
7
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H |
view more