Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Andrea Gamiz vs Eva Vedder Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gamiz vs Vedder analysis and find out who is favored!
Andrea Gamiz vs Eva Vedder Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gamiz has won 17.65% of points on his second serve, while Vedder has won 44.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gamiz, in recent form, has won 36.36% of his opponent's second serve points, while Vedder has won 54.73%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.77% and 37.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gamiz has saved 28.57% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vedder has saved 51.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gamiz has won 27.78% of matches played (W/L 5/ 13), with Vedder winning 40.48% (W/L 17/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gamiz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 367/ 263), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 31% (W/L 5/ 11). Vedder has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 70/ 49), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Gamiz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 27.27% of matches (W/L 3/ 8), where as Vedder has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 14/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gamiz winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Gamiz winning 2 and Vedder winning 2. The last match between Gamiz and Vedder was at the W25 Blumenau-Gaspar, 13-01-2022, Second, Clay with Eva Vedder getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:56:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gamiz and Vedder have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gamiz winning 0 times and Vedder 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gamiz winning 1, and Vedder 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gamiz has played against opponents with an average rank of 264.67 while Vedder has played against players with an average rank of 205.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gamiz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vedder has won 22% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gamiz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vedder has converted 44.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gamiz 1 - 1 Vedder
855
Rank
244
High
31
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
413
Rank
221
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
56% (439-338)
Career Total W/L
58% (189-139)
40% (2-3)
YTD W/L
29% (2-5)
$16,320
Career Prize Money
$2,438
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Andrea Gamiz | Eva Vedder |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
| Games Won | 20 | 22 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:0 | 1:56:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (106/150) | 46% (59/129) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (61/106) | 61% (36/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (21/44) | 51% (36/70) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 70% (7/10) | 56% (9/16) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (57/129) | 45% (68/150) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
Eva Vedder
Player
Andrea Gamiz
40%
(
23 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 7-6(7) 6-3 |
Stats
Andrea Gamiz
Player
Eva Vedder
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
36 of
71)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Andrea Gamiz | Eva Vedder |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (2/3) | 29% (2/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 38% (6/10) |
| Games Win/Loss | 45% (39/47) | 47% (71/81) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (2/2) | 29% (2/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 13 |
| DFs per game | 0.07 | 0.14 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:14:25 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 184.4 | 150.57 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (30/47) | 55% (173/312) |
| 1st Serve W% | 50% (15/30) | 65% (113/173) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 18% (3/17) | 39% (54/139) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/2) | 59% (17/29) |
| Return Pts W% | 32% (16/50) | 46% (138/299) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (2/2) | 33% (1/2) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 29% (2/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (5/0) |
Andrea Gamiz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Andrea Gamiz
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmi Hance
Player
Andrea Gamiz
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
6
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
1
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
97
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Erika Andreeva
Player
Andrea Gamiz
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
82%
(
75 of
91)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
Player
Andrea Gamiz
51%
(
36 of
71)
1st Serve %
86%
(
54 of
63)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
0
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Angelica Moratelli
Player
Andrea Gamiz
73%
(
71 of
97)
1st Serve %
80%
(
82 of
102)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
102)
110
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sofya Lansere
Player
Andrea Gamiz
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
46
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Eva Vedder Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Andreea Prisacariu
Player
Eva Vedder
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
99)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
36 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
99)
95
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Leonie Kung
Player
Eva Vedder
72%
(
61 of
85)
1st Serve %
43%
(
28 of
65)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
79
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Virginia Ferrara
57%
(
52 of
92)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
72)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
13
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilinca Dalina Amariei
Player
Eva Vedder
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
57
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
Player
Eva Vedder
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
80)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Vedder
Player
Gabriela Ce
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
74%
(
54 of
73)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
55%
(
21 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Eva Vedder
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
45 of
93)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
20 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Gamiz Vs Vedder Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Eva Vedder
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
