Anastasiya Lopata vs Edda Mamedova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Nov at 08:51 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Lopata vs E. Mamedova

UKR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Lopata 1 - 0 Mamedova
They have played 3 sets in total, with Anastasiya Lopata winning 2 and Edda Mamedova winning 1. The last match between Anastasiya Lopata and Edda Mamedova was at the W50 Austin, 10-11-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Anastasiya Lopata getting the victory 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(1).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lopata | 1 |
| Mamedova | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) W50 Austin(11-10-25)
A. Lopata vs E. Mamedova H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 63.64% (21-12) | Career Total W/L | 56.00% (56-44) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Lopata vs E. Mamedova Match Preview:
- How do the players compare in recent second serve performance? Edda Mamedova has won 36.05% of points, while Anastasiya Lopata leads with 40.74%.
- Considering return game stats, Mamedova has won 52.11% of opponents' second serve points, slightly behind Lopata’s 53.57%.
- On first serve returns, Mamedova is at 36.09%, trailing behind Lopata's more impressive 38.13%.
- In pressure situations, such as saving breakpoints, Lopata again performs better, saving 50.00% compared to Mamedova’s 46.26%.
- Overall performance in the past year shows Mamedova with a stronger win rate of 65.71% (23/12) compared to Lopata's 50.00% (2/2).
- Are both players equally adept on surface types? Mamedova and Lopata have their highest career wins on Hard courts, each at 60%.
- Analyzing tournament levels, Mamedova has participated more often and effectively, with a 72.41% win rate in Futures/ITF tournaments, versus Lopata's 50.00%.
- Evaluating opponent quality, Mamedova has faced slightly stronger opponents with an average rank of 376.51 compared to Lopata's opponents at 388.5.
- If the match progresses to a deciding set, Mamedova has a 44% win rate, whereas Lopata boasts a perfect 100% win record.
- In terms of break point conversion, Mamedova has a small edge at 44.09%, versus Lopata's 41.38%.
Editorial Prediction (November 10, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Edda Mamedova and Anastasiya Lopata promises to be a close contest, given their strengths and recent performances. Second serve proficiency gives a slight edge to Lopata, which might improve her chances in long rallies.
Mamedova has shown a consistent ability to perform well in competitive matches over the past year. However, Lopata's efficiency under pressure might tip the scales during critical points.
While Mamedova possesses a higher overall match win percentage, particularly at lower-level events, Lopata's ability to clutch during deciding sets and high-pressure scenarios could prove decisive.
Considering all factors, especially the recent trend of stronger performance under pressure, Anastasiya Lopata appears to have a slight advantage and is likely to emerge victorious in this duel.
Anastasiya Lopata vs Edda Mamedova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Lopata vs E. Mamedova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 19 | Games Won | 17 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 3:31:14 | Average Match Time | 3:31:14 |
| 48% (56/117) | 1st Serve % | 74% (88/119) |
| 59% (33/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 45% (40/88) |
| 46% (28/61) | 2nd Serve Win % | 58% (18/31) |
| 69% (9/13) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (8/16) |
| 51% (61/119) | Return Points Win % | 48% (56/117) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Lopata Recent Matches Played
E. Mamedova Recent Matches Played

A. Lopata vs E. Mamedova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.64% (21/12) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.00% (56/44) |
| 58.23% (46/33) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.80% (125/99) |
| 52.80% (386/345) | Games Win/Loss | 52.65% (1083/974) |
| 63.64% (14/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.38% (38/26) |
| 63.64% (7/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.45% (10/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.14% (8/6) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 62 | Aces Total | 58 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 83 | Total Double Faults | 238 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:32:57 |
| 326.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 410.32 |
| 56% (1272/2280) | 1st Serve % | 63% (3590/5741) |
| 60% (759/1272) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (2072/3590) |
| 46% (464/1008) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (915/2151) |
| 47% (152/321) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (447/868) |
| 48% (1105/2292) | Return Points Win % | 50% (3025/6073) |
| 68.75% (11/5) | Challenger W/L | 45.71% (16/19) |
| 58.82% (10/7) | Futures W/L | 61.54% (40/25) |
| 64% (21/33) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (55/97) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 70% (7/10) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 78% (14/18) |
| 69% (9/13) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (13/27) |
| 84% (19/16) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (55/49) |
| 16% (19/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (55/6) |
| 36% (14/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (44/6) |