Anastasia Zakharova vs Anouk Koevermans Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W L L W W W L L
Form
W L W L L W L W L LHead To Head: Zakharova 0 - 1 Koevermans
They have played 0 sets in total, with Zakharova winning 0 and Koevermans winning 0. The last match between Zakharova and Koevermans was at the French Open - Paris, 20-05-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Clay, with Anouk Koevermans getting the victory 6-7(6) 7-5 7-6(9).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anastasia Zakharova | 0 |
| Anouk Koevermans | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: French Open - Paris(20-05-2025)
Anouk Koevermans
Anastasia Zakharova
6
7
7
5
7
6
| Zakharova | Stats | Koevermans |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (17-17) | YTD Win/Loss | 45% (10-12) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 93 | Ranking | 190 |
| 93 | Highest Rank | 178 |
| 23 | Age | 21 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 16 | Titles | 2 |
| 65% (265-141) | Career Total W/L | 61% (155-101) |
| $485,550 | Career Prize Money | $43,000 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Bublik PREDICTION Grass
Terra Wortmann Open - Halle atp
18 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Alcaraz VS Clar PREDICTION Grass
cinch Championships - London atp
19 Jun 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Zakharova VS Koevermans H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(6) 7-5 7-6(9) |
Stats 
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
65%
(
88 of
135)
1st Serve %
71%
(
92 of
130)
4
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
11
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
52 of
92)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
48%
(
65 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
63 of
130)
133
Total Points Won
132
|
||||
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zakharova vs Koevermans Match Preview :
- Zakharova has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 40.38% of points over recent months compared to Koevermans' 39.88%. Could this give her an upper hand in crucial match moments?
- When it comes to return games, Zakharova not only wins more of her opponent's second serve points at 51.36% but also performs better on first serve returns, winning 35.34%. Koevermans stands at 48.7% and 29.8%, respectively.
- Under pressure, Koevermans excels, saving 55.15% of breakpoints compared to Zakharova's 46.88%, providing a key advantage during critical game situations.
- Koevermans has a higher match-winning percentage this year at 65.28%, slightly ahead of Zakharova at 61.97%, indicating a more consistently high performance.
- Both players favor indoor hard courts, but Zakharova has a superior win percentage at 69%, compared to Koevermans' 62%.
- Zakharova competes against better-ranked opponents on average, with an opponent rank of 217.51 compared to Koevermans' 325.54, potentially enhancing her competitive edge.
- In deciding sets, Koevermans shows greater resilience, winning 52% of these high-pressure finales, whereas Zakharova has a 44% success rate.
- Koevermans outperforms in converting breakpoints, achieving a 43.01% conversion rate compared to Zakharova's 36.84%, crucial for capitalizing on opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (May 20, 2025, UTC):
As the upcoming match approaches, the statistics reveal a competitive clash between Zakharova and Koevermans. Zakharova's slightly superior second serve performance and return game efficiency could grant her an initial advantage, suggesting the potential to dictate the flow of rallies.
Conversely, Koevermans exhibits a formidable aptitude for pressure situations, saving a significant percentage of breakpoints and demonstrating greater efficiency in deciding sets. This aspect of her game might prove pivotal in clutch moments.
Both players show proficiency on indoor hard surfaces, yet Zakharova's experience against higher-ranked opponents might impart a nuanced edge. However, Koevermans' consistent performance throughout the year and her adept breakpoint conversion rate provide her with critical strengths.
Considering these aspects, Koevermans holds a slight advantage. Her resilience under pressure, combined with effective breakpoint conversions, make her the likely winner in this tightly contested match.
Zakharova vs Koevermans Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Anastasia Zakharova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Mika Stojsavljevic
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Keys
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Donna Vekic
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Carol Zhao
65%
(
78 of
120)
1st Serve %
78%
(
100 of
129)
7
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
65 of
100)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
48 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
55 of
129)
127
Total Points Won
122
|
6-3 6-7(1) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Daniela Piani
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
65%
(
88 of
135)
1st Serve %
71%
(
92 of
130)
4
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
11
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
52 of
92)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
48%
(
65 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
63 of
130)
133
Total Points Won
132
|
6-7(6) 7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
10
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
8
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Zakharova
Player
Fiona Ferro
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Anouk Koevermans Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Sakkari
Player
Anouk Koevermans
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Anouk Koevermans
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
47
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Federica Urgesi
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
47%
(
37 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
83
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Anouk Koevermans
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Anastasia Zakharova
65%
(
88 of
135)
1st Serve %
71%
(
92 of
130)
4
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
11
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
52 of
92)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
48%
(
65 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
63 of
130)
133
Total Points Won
132
|
6-7(6) 7-5 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandra Eala
Player
Anouk Koevermans
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
49%
(
30 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriela Ce
Player
Anouk Koevermans
75%
(
98 of
131)
1st Serve %
72%
(
96 of
134)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
59%
(
58 of
98)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
62 of
96)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
41%
(
54 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
57 of
134)
134
Total Points Won
131
|
7-6(4) 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Julieta Estable
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65% (265/141) | Win/Loss | 61% (155/101) |
| 62% (568/341) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (343/241) |
| 56% (4565/3578) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2912/2504) |
| 69% (129/57) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (36/23) |
| 58% (64/47) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (98/62) |
| 69% (68/31) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (21/13) |
| 40% (4/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) |
| 0.12 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 476 | Aces Total | 359 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.53 |
| 1200 | Total Double Faults | 1401 |
| 1:30:54 | Average Match Time | 1:34:22 |
| 259.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 403.55 |
| 65% (16269/24905) | 1st Serve % | 61% (9295/15130) |
| 61% (9937/16269) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (5738/9295) |
| 47% (4020/8635) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (2321/5835) |
| 51% (1783/3470) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (1088/2139) |
| 49% (12293/25284) | Return Points Win % | 49% (7477/15254) |
| 48% (12/13) | Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 14% (1/6) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 49% (27/28) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 68% (161/76) | Challenger W/L | 63% (97/56) |
| 78% (64/18) | Futures W/L | 60% (56/38) |
| 65% (259/399) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (154/255) |
| 43% (30/69) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (31/57) |
| 56% (59/105) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (39/73) |
| 91% (260/236) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (157/136) |
| 9% (260/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (157/21) |
| 19% (145/27) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (99/19) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
