A. Potapova
To Win
L. Noskova
To Win
Anastasia Potapova vs Beatriz Haddad Maia Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W W L W L
Form
L L L L W L L W W WHead To Head: Potapova 1 - 0 Maia
They have played 2 sets in total, with Potapova winning 2 and Maia winning 0. The last match between Potapova and Maia was at the Dubai Duty Free Championships - Dubai, 17-02-2025, Round: First, Surface: Hard, with Anastasia Potapova getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anastasia Potapova | 1 |
| Beatriz Haddad Maia | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Dubai Duty Free Championships - Dubai(17-02-2025)
Anastasia Potapova
Beatriz Haddad Maia
6
3
6
0
| Potapova | Stats | Maia |
|---|---|---|
| 68% (17-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 30% (6-14) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 36 | Ranking | 23 |
| 21 | Highest Rank | 10 |
| 24 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 4 | Titles | 22 |
| 59% (233-163) | Career Total W/L | 65% (488-263) |
| $3,038,891 | Career Prize Money | $4,668,512 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
25 May 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
23 May 2025 / Semifinals
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Klein VS Blanchet PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
23 May 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Cerundolo VS Galan PREDICTION Clay
French Open - Paris atp
23 May 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:15:24 | Average Match Time | 1:15:24 |
| 50% (24/48) | 1st Serve % | 61% (28/46) |
| 79% (19/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 43% (12/28) |
| 54% (13/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (7/18) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (1/3) |
| 59% (27/46) | Return Points Win % | 33% (16/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Potapova vs Maia Match Preview :
Prediction Insights for the Upcoming Tennis Match:
In terms of recent performance, the statistics reveal that Potapova has an average of 45.39% success rate in points on their second serve, whereas Maia stands slightly higher at 48.04%. It is worth noting that there exists a strong correlation between this particular stat and the accuracy of match predictions.
When it comes to return game stats, Potapova has displayed dominance in recent form, winning 58.29% of their opponent's second serve points. Meanwhile, Maia has achieved a commendable success rate of 56.02%. The figures also indicate that Potapova's first serve return stats stand at 40.39%, whereas Maia trails slightly at 37.23%. These numbers play a significant role in determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup.
An analysis of how players perform under pressure reveals that Potapova has successfully saved 57.46% of breakpoints in recent matches. Comparatively, Maia has shown even greater resilience by saving 62.76% of breakpoints. This statistic proves to be invaluable when making in-game betting predictions.
Examining their overall performance, Potapova has emerged victorious in 59.62% of matches played in the past year, with a win-loss record of 31/21. On the other hand, Maia has a win percentage of 55.74% (W/L 34/27). Considering these figures, we can derive an insightful head-to-head prediction overview.
When analyzing their performance on different surfaces, Potapova demonstrates superior results on I.hard, securing a solid 67% win percentage (W/L 41/20). Conversely, their performance on Hard courts slightly declines to 54% (W/L 101/87). Moving on to Maia, their best career surface win percentage is observed on Clay courts, reaching an impressive 66% (W/L 215/110). However, their performance on I.hard experiences a slight dip, with a 59% win percentage (W/L 13/9).
Considering the level at which the players compete, it is important to note that Potapova has predominantly played on the Main tour over the past year, achieving a 66.67% success rate in matches (W/L 16/8). In contrast, Maia has participated in most of their matches on the Main tour as well, securing a 52% win percentage (W/L 13/12). Therefore, when predicting the favored player, it is crucial to consider the event level they have been competing in.
Shifting our focus to opponent quality, Potapova has frequently faced opponents with an average rank of 75.85 over the last 12 months. In contrast, Maia's opponents boast a slightly lower average rank of 65.38. This insight provides valuable context when evaluating the players' performances against different opponents.
For live predictions and betting enthusiasts, it is worth noting that if the match reaches a deciding set, Potapova has proven to triumph in 53% of such instances over the past year. Maia, on the other hand, has achieved a 52% success rate in all matches played on tour. These figures become significant factors to consider when engaging in in-game live betting.
In addition to past player performance, current event statistics also carry weight in predicting tennis matches. It is crucial to observe the performance of players in the ongoing event to determine their current form. For detailed insight into the current event stats, please refer to the section below. Furthermore, some players exhibit superior performance at specific events, and this aspect should be taken into account when predicting the outcome.
A fundamental aspect to consider in in-game live betting is the break point conversion rates. Potapova has converted 42.51% of breakpoint opportunities, while Maia has demonstrated a higher conversion rate at 50.21% when it comes to breaking their opponents' serve. These statistics significantly influence live betting tips when players face breakpoint opportunities.
Finally, for those intrigued by models that predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point (Warning: Stats geeks only).
Potapova vs Maia Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Anastasia Potapova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Anastasia Potapova
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Dayana Yastremska
52%
(
55 of
106)
1st Serve %
60%
(
68 of
113)
3
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
7
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
51%
(
26 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
46%
(
49 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
53 of
113)
110
Total Points Won
109
|
2-6 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Marta Kostyuk
Player
Anastasia Potapova
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Sofia Kenin
47%
(
47 of
100)
1st Serve %
69%
(
78 of
113)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
55%
(
29 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
49 of
113)
106
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Qinwen Zheng
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
62)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
64 of
90)
0
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
5
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
106
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasia Potapova
Player
Clara Tauson
51%
(
47 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
77 of
116)
5
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
47 of
77)
48%
(
22 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
52 of
116)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
2-6 7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Beatriz Haddad Maia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Emma Navarro
69%
(
74 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
66 of
106)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
9
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
48 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
106)
111
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Clara Tauson
62%
(
63 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
1
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
6
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marie Bouzkova
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Belinda Bencic
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
72%
(
74 of
103)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
107)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Beatriz Haddad Maia
Player
Bernarda Pera
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
119%
(
64 of
54)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
9
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (233/163) | Win/Loss | 65% (488/263) |
| 56% (529/413) | Sets Win/Loss | 62% (1067/662) |
| 52% (4581/4228) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (8762/7107) |
| 53% (103/90) | Hard Win/Loss | 65% (224/121) |
| 65% (75/41) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (219/113) |
| 66% (41/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54% (13/11) |
| 56% (14/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 64% (32/18) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 800 | Aces Total | 1183 |
| 0.42 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1799 | Total Double Faults | 1799 |
| 1:36:9 | Average Match Time | 1:20:33 |
| 285.32 | Average Opponent Rank | 402.44 |
| 56% (15768/28098) | 1st Serve % | 68% (25771/38082) |
| 64% (10018/15768) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (16793/25727) |
| 45% (5565/12330) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (5881/12399) |
| 46% (1667/3637) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (2209/4710) |
| 46% (13021/28277) | Return Points Win % | 45% (17649/39356) |
| 50% (23/23) | Slam W/L | 61% (42/27) |
| 49% (40/42) | Masters W/L | 50% (42/42) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 64% (21/12) |
| 63% (117/69) | Main Tour W/L | 60% (102/68) |
| 63% (40/23) | Challenger W/L | 69% (219/99) |
| 71% (12/5) | Futures W/L | 81% (62/15) |
| 59% (227/385) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (477/727) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 52% (56/108) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (96/175) |
| 57% (89/155) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (147/242) |
| 84% (214/179) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (479/419) |
| 16% (214/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (479/58) |
| 30% (182/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (271/71) |
Potapova vs. Maia Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
