Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Prediction of Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Gail Brodsky Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
55% (400-322)
Career Total W/L
57% (146-110)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,945,406
Career Prize Money
$33,595
0
YTD Titles
0
Recent Form Stats
Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Gail Brodsky Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Garrigues 1 - 0 Brodsky
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Garrigues has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Brodsky has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Garrigues, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Brodsky has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Garrigues has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brodsky has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Garrigues has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Brodsky winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Garrigues has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 220/ 119), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 17/ 22). Brodsky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 22/ 11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Garrigues winning 1 times and Brodsky being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Garrigues winning 2 and Brodsky winning 0. The last match between Garrigues and Brodsky was at the U.S. Open - New York, 31-08-2009, First, Hard with Anabel Medina Garrigues getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Garrigues and Brodsky have played a deciding set 0 times, with Garrigues winning 0 times and Brodsky 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Garrigues winning 0, and Brodsky 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Garrigues has played against opponents with an average rank of while Brodsky has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Garrigues has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brodsky has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Garrigues has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brodsky has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Anabel Medina Garrigues vs Gail Brodsky For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Garrigues VS Brodsky
| stats | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Gail Brodsky |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (45/65) | 59% (36/61) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (33/45) | 67% (24/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (9/20) | 52% (13/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 14% (1/7) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (24/61) | 35% (23/65) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Gail Brodsky
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Anabel Medina Garrigues | Gail Brodsky |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Anabel Medina Garrigues Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Tereza Smitkova
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Jade Suvrijn
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
89 of
138)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
67 of
138)
129
Total Points Won
113
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
71%
(
61 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alla Kudryavtseva
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
72%
(
68 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
40%
(
38 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Gioia Barbieri
64%
(
74 of
116)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
105)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
46%
(
34 of
74)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
50%
(
11 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
51%
(
59 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
60 of
105)
117
Total Points Won
104
|
6-2 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anabel Medina Garrigues
Player
Olga Govortsova
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
92)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lourdes Dominguez-Lino
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
52%
(
17 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francoise Abanda
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
32 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
83
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
An-Sophie Mestach
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sesil Karatantcheva
Player
Anabel Medina Garrigues
75%
(
53 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gail Brodsky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Junri Namigata
Player
Gail Brodsky
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
37%
(
16 of
43)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
45%
(
21 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
48
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katie Swan
Player
Gail Brodsky
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
58)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gail Brodsky
Player
En Shuo Liang
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Gail Brodsky
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gail Brodsky
Player
Hiroko Kuwata
48%
(
51 of
107)
1st Serve %
73%
(
79 of
108)
8
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
47 of
79)
41%
(
23 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
50 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gail Brodsky
Player
Abbie Myers
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Gail Brodsky
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gergana Topalova
Player
Gail Brodsky
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gail Brodsky
Player
Haley Giavara
46%
(
31 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalija Stevanovic
Player
Gail Brodsky
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
9
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
No H2H Matches Available
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
