Ana Konjuh vs Nahia Berecoechea Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L L L
Form
L W L W L W W L L LHead-2-Head: Konjuh 1 - 0 Berecoechea
They have played 2 sets in total, with Konjuh winning 2 and Berecoechea winning 0. The last match between Konjuh and Berecoechea was at the W35 Manchester, 16-02-2025, Q1 round, I.hard with Ana Konjuh getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ana Konjuh | 1 |
| Nahia Berecoechea | 0 |
W35 Manchester(16-02-2025)
6
4
6
1
| Konjuh | Stats | Berecoechea |
|---|---|---|
| 50% (10-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 44% (4-5) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 520 | Ranking | 454 |
| 20 | Highest Rank | 363 |
| 27 | Age | 20 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 5 | Titles | 3 |
| 59% (274-187) | Career Total W/L | 59% (126-88) |
| $1,940,308 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Pegula PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
28 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Mensik VS Fritz PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami atp
29 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Konjuh VS Berecoechea H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Ana Konjuh
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Konjuh VS Berecoechea H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:16:19 | Average Match Time | 1:16:19 |
| 63% (34/54) | 1st Serve % | 75% (41/55) |
| 85% (29/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (22/41) |
| 45% (9/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 57% (8/14) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 45% (25/55) | Return Points Win % | 30% (16/54) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ana Konjuh vs Nahia Berecoechea Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Ana Konjuh 1 - 0 Nahia Berecoechea
Insights on the upcoming tennis match
- Recent form analysis of second serve performance: Examining the players' performance over the past six months, it is evident that Konjuh has demonstrated proficiency on their second serve, winning 44.38% of points. Meanwhile, Berecoechea has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 43.81%. This particular statistic bears a significant correlation to the accuracy of predicting the outcome of a match.
- Statistical analysis of return game performance: Considering the recent form, Konjuh has showcased remarkable prowess in return games, securing victory in 51.53% of their opponent's second serve points. Conversely, Berecoechea has achieved an impressive success rate of 61.13%. Moreover, the figures for first serve returns stand at 35.85% for Konjuh and 43.23% for Berecoechea. These statistics serve as key indicators when assessing the favorite in this head-to-head matchup.
- Composure under pressure: Examining the players' ability to save breakpoints in recent form, Konjuh has displayed resilience by saving 61.15% of such crucial points. Comparatively, Berecoechea has managed to save 48.94%. This insightful statistic proves highly valuable for predictions in the realm of in-game betting.
- Performance overview: Analyzing their overall performance in the past year, Konjuh has achieved a 50% win ratio, with 15 wins and 15 losses. Berecoechea, on the other hand, boasts a higher success rate of 57.89%, accumulating 33 wins against 24 losses. These figures provide an overall preview of the head-to-head encounter.
- Preferred playing surfaces: Konjuh's most favorable career surface is Grass, where they have triumphed in 63% of matches (27 wins and 16 losses). Conversely, their performance on Hard courts has been comparatively weaker, with a win rate of 56% (95 wins and 75 losses). Berecoechea, on the contrary, excels on Hard courts, securing triumphs in 62% of matches (88 wins and 53 losses). However, their performance on Indoor Hard courts reflects a 50% win rate (8 wins and 8 losses).
- Analysis of players' level: Reviewing the competition level in which they have competed over the past year, it becomes apparent that Konjuh has predominantly played in the prestigious Challengers/ITF tournaments with a prize money of over $10K. Within that sphere, they have achieved success in 54.17% of matches (13 wins and 11 losses). Similarly, Berecoechea has also gravitated towards these tournaments, enjoying a commendable win rate of 57.89% (33 wins and 24 losses). Ultimately, when comparing statistical data to predict the favorite, it is imperative to consider the relative event levels where the players have been honing their skills.
- Opponent quality: In the previous 12 months, Konjuh has faced opponents with an average ranking of 332.33, while Berecoechea has encountered players with an average ranking of 389.68. This statistic sheds light on the caliber of opponents they have encountered.
- Deciding set performance: For those keen on making live predictions and engaging in betting activities, it is noteworthy that Konjuh has triumphed in 44% of deciding sets over the past year, while Berecoechea's success rate stands at 50% in all matches played on the tour. These figures are particularly relevant when the match enters a crucial determining set.
- Current event head-to-head statistics: While historical player performance remains insightful in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider the players' current event statistics to gauge their current form. Therefore, it is advisable to reference the section below for an assessment of their performance in the ongoing tournament. Additionally, some players display enhanced capabilities at specific events, and this factor should be considered when predicting the ultimate outcome.
- Break point conversion efficiency: In recent times, Konjuh has capitalized on 47.1% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Berecoechea has successfully seized 50.23% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This remarkable statistic proves invaluable for in-game live betting tips whenever either player encounters a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in utilizing models that specialize in predicting tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent resource to commence your exploration. (Caution: Recommended for aficionados of statistical analysis)
Ana Konjuh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Marina Stakusic
Player
Ana Konjuh
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Ana Konjuh
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Malene Helgo
Player
Ana Konjuh
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
45%
(
30 of
66)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ana Konjuh
Player
Margarita Ignatjeva
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Ana Konjuh
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
84)
0
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ana Konjuh
Player
Mai Hontama
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ana Konjuh
Player
Aneta Kladivova
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ana Konjuh
Player
Anastasiia Sobolieva
68%
(
15 of
22)
1st Serve %
61%
(
17 of
28)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
31
Total Points Won
19
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Ana Konjuh
53%
(
55 of
103)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
1
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
60%
(
29 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
39 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ana Konjuh
Player
Diana Martynov
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
88%
(
42 of
48)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nahia Berecoechea Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
9
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
48%
(
32 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ana Konjuh
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nahia Berecoechea
Player
Amy Zhu
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nahia Berecoechea
Player
Mia Wainwright
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
46%
(
19 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
48
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joanna Garland
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nahia Berecoechea
Player
Verena Meliss
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Loes Ebeling Koning
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-3 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nahia Berecoechea
Player
Nagomi Higashitani
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
83%
(
54 of
65)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
49%
(
24 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
51
|
4-6 6-1 10-7 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
61 of
92)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(0) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (274/187) | Win/Loss | 59% (126/88) |
| 57% (607/467) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (272/202) |
| 52% (5229/4769) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2329/2030) |
| 55% (95/77) | Hard Win/Loss | 62% (88/53) |
| 62% (77/48) | Clay Win/Loss | 51% (21/20) |
| 62% (75/46) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (17/15) |
| 63% (27/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 1729 | Aces Total | 106 |
| 0.41 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.45 |
| 1996 | Total Double Faults | 953 |
| 1:15:42 | Average Match Time | 1:20:45 |
| 393.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 416.38 |
| 56% (15108/26759) | 1st Serve % | 61% (6766/11030) |
| 69% (10469/15108) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (3860/6766) |
| 44% (5127/11644) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (1768/4264) |
| 45% (1350/2997) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 53% (861/1634) |
| 43% (11424/26572) | Return Points Win % | 51% (5711/11299) |
| 57% (38/29) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 39% (22/34) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (12/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (90/60) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (100/52) | Challenger W/L | 53% (76/68) |
| 71% (12/5) | Futures W/L | 71% (50/20) |
| 60% (267/447) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (123/211) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 56% (65/116) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (18/38) |
| 60% (99/164) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (25/47) |
| 88% (250/221) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (121/109) |
| 11% (250/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (121/12) |
| 25% (211/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (93/17) |
See recent tennis photos of Konjuh and Berecoechea
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
