Amra Sadikovic vs Natalie Proese Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sadikovic vs Proese analysis and find out who is favored!
Amra Sadikovic vs Natalie Proese Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sadikovic has won 37.78% of points on his second serve, while Proese has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sadikovic, in recent form, has won 48.94% of his opponent's second serve points, while Proese has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.88% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sadikovic has saved 37.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Proese has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sadikovic has won 50% of matches played (W/L 1/ 1), with Proese winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sadikovic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 129/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13). Proese has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 31% (W/L 4/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Sadikovic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/ 1), where as Proese has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sadikovic winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sadikovic winning 2 and Proese winning 0. The last match between Sadikovic and Proese was at the Lenzerheide, 22-06-2015, Q3, Clay with Amra Sadikovic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sadikovic and Proese have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sadikovic winning 0 times and Proese 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sadikovic winning 0, and Proese 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sadikovic has played against opponents with an average rank of 396.5 while Proese has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sadikovic has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Proese has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sadikovic has converted 42.86% of breakpoint opportunities, and Proese has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Sadikovic 1 - 0 Proese
8
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
811
Rank
126
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
726
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
58% (302-223)
Career Total W/L
41% (113-162)
50% (1-1)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$107,059
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Amra Sadikovic | Natalie Proese |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Amra Sadikovic | Natalie Proese |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 39% (16/25) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.05 | 0 |
Aces Total | 1 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
DFs Total | 4 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:39:30 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 396.5 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 67% (90/135) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 54% (49/90) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 38% (17/45) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (6/14) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (53/133) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Amra Sadikovic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Amra Sadikovic
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Amra Sadikovic
Player
Ksenia Laskutova
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
1-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Aysegul Mert
Player
Amra Sadikovic
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
63%
(
59 of
93)
7
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Amra Sadikovic
Player
Versace Gatti
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
72%
(
78 of
108)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
85%
(
46 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
51 of
78)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
22 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tamara Kostic
Player
Amra Sadikovic
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
4
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Amra Sadikovic
Player
Giulia Carbonaro
70%
(
69 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
76 of
120)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
14
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
51 of
76)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
33 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
120)
117
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Amra Sadikovic
Player
Nicol Benesova
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pamela Montez
Player
Amra Sadikovic
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
62
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Kennedy Shaffer
Player
Amra Sadikovic
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jessica Pegula
Player
Amra Sadikovic
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H |
view more
Natalie Proese Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Alessandra Mazzola
Player
Natalie Proese
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Eline Audenaert
Player
Natalie Proese
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
33 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Natalie Proese
Player
Natea Bizet
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
11
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
6 of
31)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Eva Vedder
Player
Natalie Proese
49%
(
19 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
11 of
19)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
16 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 2-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Julia Stamatova
Player
Natalie Proese
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
45%
(
26 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 1-6 10-8 | H2H |
view more