Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Amina Anshba vs Elizabeth Mandlik Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Anshba vs Mandlik analysis and find out who is favored!
Amina Anshba vs Elizabeth Mandlik Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Anshba has won 39.38% of points on his second serve, while Mandlik has won 45.84%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Anshba, in recent form, has won 51.52% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mandlik has won 55.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.37% and 40.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Anshba has saved 51.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mandlik has saved 55.33% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Anshba has won 41.03% of matches played (W/L 16/ 23), with Mandlik winning 56.92% (W/L 37/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Anshba has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 196/ 128), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 8% (W/L 1/ 11). Mandlik has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 6/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Anshba has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.18% of matches (W/L 14/ 20), where as Mandlik has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.06% of matches (W/L 18/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Anshba winning 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Anshba winning 3 and Mandlik winning 3. The last match between Anshba and Mandlik was at the W25 Daytona Beach, 10-11-2021, First, Clay with Elizabeth Mandlik getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:35:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Anshba and Mandlik have played a deciding set 2 times, with Anshba winning 1 times and Mandlik 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Anshba winning 0, and Mandlik 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Anshba has played against opponents with an average rank of 246.67 while Mandlik has played against players with an average rank of 191.22.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Anshba has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mandlik has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Anshba has converted 35.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mandlik has converted 54.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Anshba 1 - 1 Mandlik
453
Rank
278
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
124
Rank
97
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
57% (241-180)
Career Total W/L
57% (144-109)
17% (1-5)
YTD W/L
17% (1-5)
$8,220
Career Prize Money
$296,900
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Amina Anshba | Elizabeth Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
| Games Won | 26 | 29 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:35:30 | 2:35:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (111/164) | 51% (92/181) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (61/111) | 63% (58/92) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 45% (24/53) | 44% (39/89) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (11/26) | 46% (13/28) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (84/181) | 48% (79/164) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 3-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Amina Anshba
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
51%
(
41 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 7-5 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Amina Anshba
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
68%
(
62 of
91)
1st Serve %
48%
(
48 of
101)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Amina Anshba | Elizabeth Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 17% (1/5) | 17% (1/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 27% (4/11) | 27% (4/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 41% (62/90) | 45% (66/80) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 25% (1/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.01 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 1 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.48 |
| DFs Total | 14 | 34 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:29:20 | 1:50:8 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 185.17 | 165.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 77% (395/515) | 54% (257/472) |
| 1st Serve W% | 54% (215/395) | 58% (150/257) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (53/120) | 41% (88/215) |
| BPs Won% Total | 29% (21/73) | 60% (28/47) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (228/544) | 44% (205/461) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 17% (1/5) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 17% (1/6) | 17% (1/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 17% (6/1) |
Amina Anshba Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Amina Anshba
63%
(
73 of
115)
1st Serve %
79%
(
95 of
120)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
56 of
95)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
120)
122
Total Points Won
113
|
6-2 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
Player
Amina Anshba
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
91%
(
40 of
44)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amina Anshba
Player
Gloria Ceschi
77%
(
114 of
148)
1st Serve %
67%
(
84 of
125)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
56%
(
64 of
114)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
43 of
84)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
47%
(
70 of
148)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
60 of
125)
138
Total Points Won
135
|
6-7(5) 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Cakarevic
Player
Amina Anshba
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
80%
(
57 of
71)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pia Lovric
Player
Amina Anshba
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
41 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carmen Andreea Herea
Player
Amina Anshba
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
46%
(
40 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diane Parry
Player
Amina Anshba
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
Player
Amina Anshba
45%
(
25 of
56)
1st Serve %
77%
(
61 of
79)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amina Anshba
Player
Julia Caffarena
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Amina Anshba
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Katarina Zavatska
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Emeline Dartron
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Miroshnichenko
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
62%
(
68 of
109)
1st Serve %
57%
(
71 of
124)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
47%
(
51 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
62 of
124)
120
Total Points Won
113
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Usue Maitane Arconada
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
48%
(
38 of
80)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
53%
(
48 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
5
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
7
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katie Volynets
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
31%
(
12 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
74%
(
58 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Jamie Loeb
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Martina Capurro Taborda
55%
(
57 of
103)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
74)
61%
(
28 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martina Capurro Taborda
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
71%
(
72 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Anshba Vs Mandlik Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
