A. Rajecki
To Win
A. M. Fedotova
To Win
Amelia Rajecki vs Yara Bartashevich Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L L L L L
Form
W L W L W L W L W LHead-to-head: Rajecki 1 - 1 Bartashevich
They have played 6 sets in total, with Rajecki winning 3 and Bartashevich winning 3. The last match between Rajecki and Bartashevich was at the W35 Helsinki, 05-03-2025, First, I.hard with Yara Bartashevich getting the victory 6-4 3-6 7-5.
W35 Helsinki(05-03-2025)
6
4
3
6
7
5
50% (6-6)
YTD Win/Loss
58% (7-5)
1
Head-to-Head
1
467
Ranking
478
465
Highest Rank
453
22
Age
19
-
Plays
-
1
Titles
3
54% (48-41)
Career Total W/L
54% (73-61)
$4,965
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
0
Hard H2H
0
0
Clay H2H
0
1
Indoor H2H
1
0
Grass H2H
0
Upcoming Match
- / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sherif VS Sun PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Yuan VS Siniakova PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rajecki VS Bartashevich H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Yara Bartashevich
Player
Amelia Rajecki
79%
(
79 of
100)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
9
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
| 3-6 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Yara Bartashevich
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
Rajecki VS Bartashevich H2H Stats
Stats
1
H2H Matches
1
3
Sets Won
3
30
Games Won
30
13
Aces (Total)
8
14
Total Double Faults
8
2:3:46
Average Match Time
2:3:46
60% (105/175)
1st Serve %
73% (130/179)
75% (79/105)
1st Serve Win %
65% (85/130)
47% (33/70)
2nd Serve Win %
49% (24/49)
41% (7/17)
Break Points Won % (Total)
50% (7/14)
39% (70/179)
Return Points Win %
36% (63/175)
50% (1/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
50% (1/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
50% (1/2)
Deciding Set Win %
50% (1/2)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Won Match
50% (2/1)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
50% (2/1)
50% (2/1)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (0/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Amelia Rajecki vs Yara Bartashevich Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Amelia Rajecki 1 - 1 Yara Bartashevich
Performance predictions can be drawn from the statistics of both players. In the past six months, Rajecki has achieved a 42.18% success rate on second serve points, whereas Bartashevich edges slightly ahead with a 43.18% success rate. When analyzing return games, Bartashevich's performance is noteworthy; she has claimed 50.33% of points on her opponent's second serves, while Rajecki's return points stand at 47.98%. Notably, Bartashevich also excels on the first serve returns with a 33.92% success rate compared to Rajecki's 24.81%.
When examining breakpoint performance under pressure, Rajecki shows a higher resilience with a 52.24% save rate compared to Bartashevich's 46.7%. Rajecki's formidable performance is also reflected in their overall past year matches, having won 59.18% of them (W/L 29/20). Conversely, Bartashevich closes in with a 58.73% result from her matches (W/L 37/26). Furthermore, on comparing surfaces, Rajecki favors Hard courts with a 58% win rate, while Bartashevich prefers Clay with a 57% win record.
Analyzing levels of competition, Rajecki, competing mostly on Challengers/ITF tournaments greater than $10K, secures a 58.82% win percentage. Bartashevich shows a slightly lower performance, attaining a 53.33% success rate in the same competitive environment. Head-to-head encounters offer additional insights, having met once before where Rajecki emerged victorious. Their past match saw Rajecki win 3-6, 6-4, 6-4 at the W 35 Sunderland event with an average match duration of 1:51:26. This edge in direct encounters, alongside Rajecki winning their sole deciding set, suggests a strong head-to-head advantage.
In terms of opponent caliber, Bartashevich has faced higher-ranked players with an average opponent rank of 184.3, compared to Rajecki's 331.88. This caliber difference highlights Bartashevich's preparation against tougher opponents, which could influence the match outcome. If the match extends into a deciding set, Bartashevich boasts a superior recent record, winning 67% of deciding sets, significantly above Rajecki’s 41%. Finally, Bartashevich demonstrates higher efficiency in breaking serve, converting 46.96% of breakpoints compared to Rajecki's 34.11%.
Given these statistical comparisons and factoring Bartashevich's higher efficiency in key areas, it’s likely that Bartashevich stands a better chance of clinching victory in the upcoming match. Rajecki may hold a previous head-to-head win, yet Bartashevich's strengths in break point conversion and returning the opponent's serve, alongside her ability to perform in high-pressure deciding sets, make her a strong contender. Based on the statistics, Bartashevich appears better positioned to win this competitive encounter.
Amelia Rajecki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yara Bartashevich
Player
Amelia Rajecki
79%
(
79 of
100)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
9
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Amelia Rajecki
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
48%
(
43 of
90)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Stojsavljevic
Player
Amelia Rajecki
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Amelia Rajecki
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
9
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Yara Bartashevich
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Tamira Paszek
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
11
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
9
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Ava Williamson
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Josy Daems
Player
Amelia Rajecki
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Yara Bartashevich Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Yuriko Miyazaki
Player
Yara Bartashevich
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
21)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
25 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yara Bartashevich
Player
Amelia Rajecki
79%
(
79 of
100)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
9
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Yara Bartashevich
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yara Bartashevich
Player
Ipek Oz
71%
(
79 of
111)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
102)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
43 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
102)
115
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Johanne Svendsen
Player
Yara Bartashevich
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yara Bartashevich
Player
Lucie Nguyen Tan
73%
(
65 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
100
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rebecca Munk Mortensen
Player
Yara Bartashevich
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yara Bartashevich
Player
Nana Kawagishi
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
49%
(
27 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Yara Bartashevich
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yara Bartashevich
Player
Julia Adams
73%
(
74 of
102)
1st Serve %
71%
(
92 of
130)
6
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
58 of
92)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
58 of
130)
122
Total Points Won
110
|
7-5 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
54% (48/41)
Win/Loss
54% (73/61)
55% (112/93)
Sets Win/Loss
53% (160/144)
53% (989/890)
Games Win/Loss
51% (1417/1352)
58% (21/15)
Hard Win/Loss
56% (22/17)
0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss
57% (33/25)
56% (22/17)
Indoor Hard W/L
49% (18/19)
36% (5/9)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.46
Aces Per Game
0.13
423
Aces Total
181
0.48
Double Faults Per Game
0.23
437
Total Double Faults
307
1:29:29
Average Match Time
1:38:22
375.04
Average Opponent Rank
419.89
57% (3300/5827)
1st Serve %
69% (6040/8742)
70% (2299/3300)
1st Serve Win %
59% (3540/6040)
45% (1137/2527)
2nd Serve Win %
46% (1236/2703)
47% (273/577)
Break Points Won % (Total)
48% (502/1042)
42% (2309/5482)
Return Points Win %
45% (3808/8422)
0% (0/1)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
43% (3/4)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
50% (33/33)
Challenger W/L
49% (38/40)
80% (12/3)
Futures W/L
64% (35/20)
53% (47/88)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
55% (72/131)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
61% (11/18)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
47% (14/30)
39% (11/28)
Deciding Set Win %
62% (24/39)
89% (46/41)
1st Set Won, Won Match
88% (68/60)
11% (46/5)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
10% (68/7)
16% (43/7)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
20% (66/13)
See recent tennis photos of Rajecki and Bartashevich
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
