Amelia Rajecki vs Laura Brunkel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L L L L L
Form
W W L W W W L W W LHead-to-head: Rajecki 1 - 0 Brunkel
They have played 2 sets in total, with Rajecki winning 2 and Brunkel winning 0. The last match between Rajecki and Brunkel was at the W15 Oslo, 08-01-2025, Second, I.hard with Amelia Rajecki getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
W15 Oslo(08-01-2025)
6
4
6
2
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rune VS Medvedev PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
14 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
15 Mar 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Laura Brunkel
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
6
7
Aces (Total)
1
7
Total Double Faults
2
1:33:29
Average Match Time
1:33:29
54% (35/65)
1st Serve %
61% (33/54)
83% (29/35)
1st Serve Win %
58% (19/33)
53% (16/30)
2nd Serve Win %
57% (12/21)
50% (3/6)
Break Points Won % (Total)
0% (0/4)
43% (23/54)
Return Points Win %
31% (20/65)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Amelia Rajecki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yara Bartashevich
Player
Amelia Rajecki
79%
(
79 of
100)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
9
62%
(
49 of
79)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Amelia Rajecki
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
48%
(
43 of
90)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mika Stojsavljevic
Player
Amelia Rajecki
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
4
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Amelia Rajecki
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
9
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Yara Bartashevich
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
9
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
23 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Tamira Paszek
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
11
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
9
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Clara Vlasselaer
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Ava Williamson
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
52
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Josy Daems
Player
Amelia Rajecki
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Laura Brunkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizara Yaneva
Player
Laura Brunkel
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 4-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Laura Brunkel
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Brunkel
Player
Laura Mair
70%
(
63 of
90)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
1
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
104)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 1-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
54% (48/41)
Win/Loss
64% (16/9)
55% (112/93)
Sets Win/Loss
60% (33/22)
53% (989/890)
Games Win/Loss
53% (278/243)
58% (21/15)
Hard Win/Loss
69% (11/5)
0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss
50% (2/2)
56% (22/17)
Indoor Hard W/L
60% (3/2)
36% (5/9)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.46
Aces Per Game
0.06
423
Aces Total
16
0.48
Double Faults Per Game
0.14
437
Total Double Faults
36
1:29:29
Average Match Time
1:10:49
371.98
Average Opponent Rank
343
57% (3300/5827)
1st Serve %
66% (636/970)
70% (2299/3300)
1st Serve Win %
60% (380/636)
45% (1137/2527)
2nd Serve Win %
49% (162/334)
47% (273/577)
Break Points Won % (Total)
42% (52/125)
42% (2309/5482)
Return Points Win %
44% (461/1055)
0% (0/1)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
43% (3/4)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
50% (33/33)
Challenger W/L
40% (2/3)
80% (12/3)
Futures W/L
70% (14/6)
53% (47/88)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
64% (16/25)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
61% (11/18)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
33% (1/3)
39% (11/28)
Deciding Set Win %
80% (4/5)
89% (46/41)
1st Set Won, Won Match
93% (14/13)
11% (46/5)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
7% (14/1)
16% (43/7)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
27% (11/3)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
