Amelia Rajecki vs Kajsa Rinaldo Persson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L L W W L L
Form
W W L L W W W W L LH2H: Rajecki 1 - 1 Persson
They have played 5 sets in total, with Rajecki winning 3 and Persson winning 2. The last match between Rajecki and Persson was at the Lexus Ilkley Open - Ilkley, 08-06-2025, Round: Q1 round, Surface: Grass, with Amelia Rajecki getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Amelia Rajecki | 1 |
| Kajsa Rinaldo Persson | 1 |
LAST H2H MATCH: Lexus Ilkley Open - Ilkley(08-06-2025)
Amelia Rajecki
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
6
3
6
2
| Rajecki | Stats | Persson |
|---|---|---|
| 52% (17-16) | YTD Win/Loss | 59% (17-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 423 | Ranking | 338 |
| 392 | Highest Rank | 288 |
| 23 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 6 |
| 54% (59-51) | Career Total W/L | 60% (255-170) |
| $4,965 | Career Prize Money | $4,080 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tomic VS Strode PREDICTION Hard
Mifel Tennis Open - Los Cabos atp
13 Jul 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sinner VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
12 Jul 2025 / Final
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| 6-4 4-6 6-2 |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Amelia Rajecki
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
9
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
42 of
61)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 24 | Games Won | 21 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 15 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:52:14 | Average Match Time | 1:52:14 |
| 62% (100/162) | 1st Serve % | 70% (98/141) |
| 70% (70/100) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (65/98) |
| 47% (29/62) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (19/43) |
| 86% (6/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 31% (5/16) |
| 40% (57/141) | Return Points Win % | 39% (63/162) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Rajecki vs Persson Match Preview :
- Second serve analysis shows Persson leads slightly, winning 45.56% of points, compared to Rajecki’s 42.68% over the past six months. Does a strong second serve often predict the likely match winner? Yes, it usually does.
- Looking at return games, Persson has a slight edge on second serve returns, with a win rate of 50.96% versus Rajecki’s 49.2%. On first serve returns, Persson outpaces Rajecki significantly, at 36.66% to 26.75%.
- Under pressure, Rajecki performs better, saving 51.47% of breakpoints compared to Persson’s 47.2%, indicating a potential advantage in critical moments.
- In terms of match success over the past year, Persson holds a slight edge with a 60.42% winning rate compared to Rajecki's 57.81%.
- Both players prefer hard surfaces, with Rajecki achieving a 58% win rate on Hard and Persson at 58% as well, but Persson excels on Indoor Hard at 62%.
- Examining match levels, Persson has a higher win percentage in <$10K tournaments (60.87% vs. Rajecki's 56.25%), suggesting better form against similar competition.
- In their sole head-to-head match, Persson defeated Rajecki, winning two sets to one, emphasizing an advantage in direct encounters.
- Both players perform similarly in deciding sets against all opponents, each winning 43% of these matches, making their performance in final sets evenly matched.
- Their past encounter on Indoor Hard, where Persson prevailed, gives Persson a surface-specific advantage.
- Break point conversion rates are close, with Rajecki converting 38.39% and Persson 38.2%, making it a negligible factor in their performance disparity.
Editorial Prediction (June 8, 2025, UTC):
Considering second serve performance, Persson holds a marginal advantage, indicating potentially superior consistency in serve games. Return game statistics also highlight Persson’s supremacy, especially in first serve return points, which are pivotal in breaking serve.
When analyzed under pressure, Rajecki slightly outperforms Persson in warding off breakpoints, hinting at resilience during crucial moments. However, Persson’s better overall match win rate indicates a potential edge in longer sequences of play.
The players have matched against relatively similar opponent ranks, but Persson’s current form and previous head-to-head victory offer tangible advantages. Their track record on Indoor Hard reinforces Persson's likelihood to dominate on this surface.
While both competitors convert breakpoints with similar efficiency, Persson’s overall strengths in second serve returns and past head-to-head performance suggest that Persson is the more likely candidate to emerge victorious in this upcoming match.
Rajecki vs Persson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Amelia Rajecki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Amelia Rajecki
56%
(
51 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
30 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harriet Dart
Player
Amelia Rajecki
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Linda Klimovicova
59%
(
66 of
112)
1st Serve %
59%
(
70 of
119)
13
Aces
11
9
Double Faults
9
85%
(
56 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
37 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
48 of
119)
123
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(7) 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sayaka Ishii
Player
Amelia Rajecki
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
47 of
87)
1
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Amelia Rajecki
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
7
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Katy Dunne
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Joy De Zeeuw
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
9
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
0
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
48 of
66)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
30 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Justina Mikulskyte
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
49%
(
29 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tara Wuerth
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
73%
(
69 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Mia Ristic
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
51 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Arantxa Rus
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
77
|
0-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Alexis Blokhina
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
Player
Chiara Jerolimov
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve %
71%
(
20 of
28)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
5 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
37
Total Points Won
15
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amelia Rajecki
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Oleksandra Oliynykova
Player
Kajsa Rinaldo Persson
78%
(
63 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
89)
92
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (59/51) | Win/Loss | 60% (255/170) |
| 54% (136/116) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (570/400) |
| 52% (1224/1110) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4735/4030) |
| 58% (30/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 58% (57/42) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (149/97) |
| 56% (22/17) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (49/30) |
| 37% (7/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.45 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 513 | Aces Total | 317 |
| 0.47 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 535 | Total Double Faults | 1420 |
| 1:29:43 | Average Match Time | 1:8:5 |
| 387.85 | Average Opponent Rank | 481.99 |
| 57% (4085/7155) | 1st Serve % | 65% (12369/19140) |
| 70% (2863/4085) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (7457/12369) |
| 45% (1373/3070) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (2956/6772) |
| 47% (323/681) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1348/2715) |
| 42% (2807/6753) | Return Points Win % | 48% (9351/19398) |
| 0% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50% (4/4) |
| 43% (3/4) | Main Tour W/L | 14% (1/6) |
| 51% (43/41) | Challenger W/L | 59% (118/81) |
| 76% (13/4) | Futures W/L | 63% (132/79) |
| 53% (57/108) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (249/414) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 59% (16/27) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (43/82) |
| 41% (14/34) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (62/128) |
| 88% (56/49) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (266/224) |
| 13% (56/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (266/38) |
| 19% (54/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (158/28) |
Rajecki vs. Persson Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
