Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Prediction of Amelia Bissett vs Esther Adeshina Head-to-Head, Best Odds & Picks At Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bissett vs Adeshina analysis and find out who is favored!
Amelia Bissett vs Esther Adeshina Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bissett 0 - 0 Adeshina
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bissett has won 46.51% of points on their second serve, while Adeshina has won 50.25%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bissett, in recent form, has won 53.81% of their opponent's second serve points, while Adeshina has won 58.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.53% and 47.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bissett has saved 49.23% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Adeshina has saved 49.23% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bissett has won 63.64% of matches played (W/L 7/ 4), with Adeshina winning 78.57% (W/L 11/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bissett has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 30/ 22). Adeshina has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 11/ 5), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Bissett has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 4/ 3), where as Adeshina has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.57% of matches (W/L 11/ 3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bissett has played against opponents with an average rank of 328.09 while Adeshina has played against players with an average rank of 263.79.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bissett has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Adeshina has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bissett has converted 45.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Adeshina has converted 62.96% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
58% (32-23)
Career Total W/L
56% (14-11)
64% (7-4)
YTD W/L
79% (11-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Amelia Bissett vs Esther Adeshina For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Bissett VS Adeshina
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Amelia Bissett | Esther Adeshina |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (7/4) | 79% (11/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (15/9) | 77% (24/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (117/96) | 63% (172/100) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 79% (11/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.11 | 0.05 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 7 |
| DFs per game | 0.43 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 45 | 34 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:15:10 | 1:9:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 328.09 | 263.79 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (341/556) | 69% (454/657) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (203/341) | 59% (267/454) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (100/215) | 50% (102/203) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (34/75) | 63% (51/81) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (246/550) | 51% (314/616) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 79% (11/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (7/11) | 79% (11/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 91% (11/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 33% (3/1) |
Amelia Bissett Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Amelia Bissett
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve %
77%
(
33 of
43)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Diana Marcinkevica
Player
Amelia Bissett
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
20%
(
10 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amelia Bissett
Player
Amandine Monnot
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 7-6(3) 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amelia Bissett
Player
Danielle Daley
49%
(
34 of
69)
1st Serve %
43%
(
27 of
63)
-
Aces
-
8
Double Faults
6
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Amelia Bissett
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 7-6(7) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelia Bissett
Player
Malene Helgo
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amelia Bissett
Player
Carolann Delaunay
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
23 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alyssa Reguer
Player
Amelia Bissett
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
9
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amelia Bissett
Player
Taylor Gruber
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Esther Adeshina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Esther Adeshina
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Esther Adeshina
Player
Luana Plaza Araujo
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Esther Adeshina
Player
Marie Villet
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
80%
(
44 of
55)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
0
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Esther Adeshina
Player
Ranim Rassil
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Imogen Haddad
Player
Esther Adeshina
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
72 of
103)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
50%
(
38 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
53 of
103)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 7-6(9) 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Lamis Alhussein Abdel Aziz
Player
Esther Adeshina
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
49%
(
41 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
6-0 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Esther Adeshina
Player
Julia Adams
76%
(
62 of
82)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
102)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Esther Adeshina
Player
Isabelle Cherny
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Free Tennis Predictions For Today's Matches
A few tennis predictions for upcoming lower level events head to head tennis matches are below. If you want to get access to the best matches that will win you the most, subscribe to our tennis predictions plan for a low monthly fee and get full access to all our expert picks with full odds analysis and value bets.
Bissett Vs Adeshina Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Bissett are available here and Adeshina photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
