Amber Mcginnis vs Katharine Fahey Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mcginnis vs Fahey analysis and find out who is favored!
Amber Mcginnis vs Katharine Fahey Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mcginnis has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Fahey has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mcginnis, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fahey has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mcginnis has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fahey has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mcginnis has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Fahey winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mcginnis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Fahey has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 100% (W/L 5/ 0), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 14/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mcginnis winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mcginnis winning 0 and Fahey winning 2. The last match between Mcginnis and Fahey was at the W25 Naples, 17-11-2019, Q1 round, Clay with Katharine Fahey getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mcginnis and Fahey have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mcginnis winning 0 times and Fahey 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mcginnis winning 0, and Fahey 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mcginnis has played against opponents with an average rank of while Fahey has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mcginnis has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fahey has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mcginnis has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fahey has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mcginnis 0 - 1 Fahey
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
505
High
27
Age
Plays
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Form
0% (0-5)
Career Total W/L
66% (43-22)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Amber Mcginnis | Katharine Fahey |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 4 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Amber Mcginnis | Katharine Fahey |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Amber Mcginnis Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Carson Tanguilig
Player
Amber Mcginnis
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Katharine Fahey Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Seone Mendez
Player
Katharine Fahey
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Katharine Fahey
Player
Stephanie Wagner
74%
(
72 of
97)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Katharine Fahey
Player
Olga Govortsova
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
11 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
42
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Katharine Fahey
Player
Luisa Stefani
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
48%
(
33 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-4 11-9 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 5-2 ret. | H2H | |||
R2 |
Marcela Zacarias
Player
Katharine Fahey
77%
(
83 of
108)
1st Serve %
68%
(
70 of
103)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
52%
(
43 of
83)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
49%
(
53 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
103)
109
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Katharine Fahey
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
42 of
78)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 5-7 12-10 | H2H |
view more