Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Amber Marshall vs Natalie Barbir Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marshall vs Barbir analysis and find out who is favored!
Amber Marshall vs Natalie Barbir Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marshall has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Barbir has won 37.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marshall, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Barbir has won 59.82%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marshall has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Barbir has saved 41.18% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marshall has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Barbir winning 25% (W/L 4/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marshall has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 34/ 26), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Barbir has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 3/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Marshall winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Marshall winning 2 and Barbir winning 0. The last match between Marshall and Barbir was at the W60 Bendigo, 21-10-2019, Q1 round, Hard with Amber Marshall getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:7:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marshall and Barbir have played a deciding set 0 times, with Marshall winning 0 times and Barbir 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Marshall winning 0, and Barbir 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marshall has played against opponents with an average rank of while Barbir has played against players with an average rank of 36.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marshall has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Barbir has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marshall has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Barbir has converted 39.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Marshall 1 - 0 Barbir
Ret.
Rank
610
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
34
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
55% (34-28)
Career Total W/L
22% (34-122)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Amber Marshall | Natalie Barbir |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:7:0 | 1:7:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (27/50) | 65% (37/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (19/27) | 49% (18/37) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (12/23) | 25% (5/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (34/57) | 38% (19/50) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Amber Marshall
Player
Natalie Barbir
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Amber Marshall | Natalie Barbir |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 20% (2/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (36/59) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 5 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:45:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 146 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 65% (170/261) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (95/170) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (36/91) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 33% (12/36) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (119/287) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
Amber Marshall Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Tomic
Player
Amber Marshall
45%
(
33 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sohyun Park
Player
Amber Marshall
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amber Marshall
Player
Sakura Hosogi
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 1-6 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Destanee Aiava
Player
Amber Marshall
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
46%
(
27 of
59)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amber Marshall
Player
Erin Routliffe
45%
(
28 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sachia Vickery
Player
Amber Marshall
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
47%
(
20 of
43)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amber Marshall
Player
Belinda Woolcock
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
38 of
73)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
1-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amber Marshall
Player
Alicia Smith
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Natalie Barbir Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Bridget Mihulka
Player
Natalie Barbir
56%
(
74 of
131)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
6
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
4
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
49%
(
28 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
43%
(
56 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
123
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelia Zylberman
Player
Natalie Barbir
50%
(
62 of
123)
1st Serve %
66%
(
78 of
119)
1
Aces
4
18
Double Faults
6
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
34%
(
21 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
47%
(
58 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
59 of
119)
124
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(7) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Natalie Barbir
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
74%
(
29 of
39)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alana Subasic
Player
Natalie Barbir
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
37 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 3-6 13-11 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natalie Barbir
Player
Bianca Compuesto
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denise Torrealba
Player
Natalie Barbir
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
0
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 0-6 12-10 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mia Horvit
Player
Natalie Barbir
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
10 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 2-6 10-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Marshall Vs Barbir Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
