Amber Maatman vs Tesse Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Maatman vs Tesse analysis and find out who is favored!
Amber Maatman vs Tesse Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Maatman has won 43.75% of points on his second serve, while Tesse has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Maatman, in recent form, has won 38.46% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tesse has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.41% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Maatman has saved 37.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tesse has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Maatman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 4), with Tesse winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Maatman has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 8% (W/L 1/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Tesse has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Maatman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 4), where as Tesse has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Maatman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tesse has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Maatman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tesse has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Maatman has converted 25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tesse has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Maatman 0 - 0 Tesse
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Amber Maatman | Tesse |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 1st Match |
Games Win/Loss | 32% (6/13) | 1st Match |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
DFs per game | 0.22 | 1st Match |
DFs Total | 2 | 1st Match |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
1st Serve % | 74% (46/62) | 1st Match |
1st Serve W% | 46% (21/46) | 1st Match |
2nd Serve W% | 44% (7/16) | 1st Match |
BPs Won% Total | 25% (1/4) | 1st Match |
Return Pts W% | 33% (20/60) | 1st Match |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 1st Match |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 1st Match |
Amber Maatman Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Yelena Lebeau
Player
Amber Maatman
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Amber Maatman
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
63%
(
20 of
32)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
12)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
88%
(
28 of
32)
50
Total Points Won
12
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Arianna Zucchini
Player
Amber Maatman
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Tesse Recent Matches Played
No Past Matches Available