Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Amaury Raynel vs Niels Visker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Raynel vs Visker analysis and find out who is favored!
Amaury Raynel vs Niels Visker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Raynel has won 51.02% of points on his second serve, while Visker has won 53.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Raynel, in recent form, has won 54.59% of his opponent's second serve points, while Visker has won 47.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.57% and 29.76% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Raynel has saved 62.09% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Visker has saved 69.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Raynel has won 57.97% of matches played (W/L 40/ 29), with Visker winning 65% (W/L 52/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Raynel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 58/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 23/ 19). Visker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 43/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 64/ 40).
- Player level: In the last year, Raynel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.97% of matches (W/L 40/ 29), where as Visker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.94% of matches (W/L 50/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Raynel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Raynel winning 2 and Visker winning 0. The last match between Raynel and Visker was at the M25 Marburg, 05-07-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Amaury Raynel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:42:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Raynel and Visker have played a deciding set 0 times, with Raynel winning 0 times and Visker 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Raynel winning 0, and Visker 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Raynel has played against opponents with an average rank of 103.04 while Visker has played against players with an average rank of 138.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Raynel has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Visker has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Raynel has converted 48.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Visker has converted 40.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Raynel 1 - 0 Visker
628
Rank
622
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
593
Rank
593
High
22
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
59% (133-94)
Career Total W/L
64% (114-64)
50% (8-8)
YTD W/L
71% (20-8)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Amaury Raynel | Niels Visker |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:0 | 1:42:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (42/65) | 65% (51/78) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (28/42) | 59% (30/51) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (13/23) | 37% (10/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 75% (3/4) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (38/78) | 37% (24/65) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Amaury Raynel
Player
Niels Visker
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Amaury Raynel | Niels Visker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (8/8) | 71% (20/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 49% (20/21) | 67% (41/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (195/189) | 54% (318/275) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 73% (8/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 75% (6/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (5/6) | 67% (6/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.76 |
| Aces Total | 51 | 220 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 30 | 73 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:15 | 1:29:42 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 108.81 | 115.57 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (824/1204) | 63% (1203/1904) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (527/824) | 76% (912/1203) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (192/380) | 51% (357/700) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (53/102) | 43% (62/144) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (483/1175) | 36% (658/1812) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (8/8) | 71% (20/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (8/16) | 70% (19/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 91% (10/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (6/3) | 91% (22/20) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (6/3) | 9% (22/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (10/5) | 0% (6/0) |
Amaury Raynel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandre Aubriot
Player
Amaury Raynel
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Axel Garcian
Player
Amaury Raynel
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Amaury Raynel
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amaury Raynel
Player
Emile Hudd
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
61%
(
78 of
128)
1
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
57 of
78)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
32%
(
32 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
46 of
128)
113
Total Points Won
114
|
2-6 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amaury Raynel
Player
Elvin Hashimov
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
45%
(
17 of
38)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Amaury Raynel
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
76
|
5-7 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amaury Raynel
Player
Henri Haupt
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Amaury Raynel
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
40 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amaury Raynel
Player
Mae Malige
71%
(
72 of
102)
1st Serve %
52%
(
50 of
97)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
107
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alessandro Pecci
Player
Amaury Raynel
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
13
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Niels Visker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Liam Gavrielides
Player
Niels Visker
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
99)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
43 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
99)
112
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Pavel Verbin
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
75%
(
69 of
92)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Jasza Szajrych
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
56%
(
23 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Niels Visker
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Eero Vasa
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Deney Wassermann
50%
(
16 of
32)
1st Serve %
58%
(
15 of
26)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
11 of
15)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
30
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
21 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Ostapenkov
Player
Niels Visker
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
75%
(
50 of
67)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Niels Visker
Player
Daniel Khazime
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
66%
(
48 of
73)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
14 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
view more
Raynel Vs Visker Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
