Matchstat.com expert prediction for the Raynel Campana H2H. Here is our in-depth stats analysis and accurate prediction of the Raynel Campana head to head.
Full Stats Used To Calculate Our Raynel Vs Campana Prediction Are Further Down This Page. Here Is A Brief Snapshot

The best career year for Raynel was 2023 when he won 59% of matches played on all surfaces (44/30). Campana was in the best form in 2022 when he had victories of 60% of his matches (34/23). In their last event played, Campana made the First round at M25 Antalya, whereas Raynel played M15 Sharm ElSheikh and made the Quarterfinals.


630
Rank
623
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
Form
59% (125-86)
Career Total W/L
56% (94-73)
59% (44-30)
YTD W/L
50% (21-21)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

stats | Amaury Raynel | Federico Campana |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 2:35:0 | 2:35:0 |
1st Serve % | 69% (57/83) | 57% (40/70) |
1st Serve Win% | 70% (40/57) | 48% (19/40) |
2nd Serve Win% | 38% (10/26) | 47% (14/30) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (5/13) | 9% (1/11) |
Return Points W% | 53% (37/70) | 40% (33/83) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Recent Form Is Very Important In Predicting An Upcoming H2H. Recent Matches With Stats…
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-5 6-0 |
![]() ![]()
Amaury Raynel
Player
Federico Campana
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
87
Total Points Won
66
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Amaury Raynel | Federico Campana |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 59% (44/30) | 50% (21/21) |
Sets Win/Loss | 56% (94/74) | 53% (49/44) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (828/742) | 51% (445/431) |
Hard Win/Loss | 66% (19/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (14/14) | 50% (21/21) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (11/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.12 |
Aces Total | 113 | 53 |
DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.26 |
DFs Total | 176 | 110 |
Avg Match Time | 1:43:7 | 1:23:54 |
Avg Opp Rank | 93.72 | 82.14 |
1st Serve % | 68% (3168/4673) | 59% (1228/2069) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (1983/3168) | 60% (741/1228) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (708/1505) | 48% (404/841) |
BPs Won% Total | 47% (250/535) | 37% (95/255) |
Return Pts W% | 44% (2033/4613) | 42% (877/2094) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 60% (43/29) | 50% (21/21) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (43/73) | 50% (21/42) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 45% (9/20) | 38% (3/8) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (14/21) | 22% (2/9) |
1st set W, W | 92% (37/34) | 87% (23/20) |
1st set W, L | 8% (37/3) | 13% (23/3) |
1st set L, W | 27% (37/10) | 5% (19/1) |
Amaury Raynel Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Petr Bar Biryukov
Player
Amaury Raynel
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
69%
(
66 of
96)
18
Aces
6
14
Double Faults
2
81%
(
50 of
62)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
30 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Amaury Raynel
Player
Faris Zakaryia
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Amaury Raynel
Player
Viktor Jovic
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
98)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
18%
(
4 of
22)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
82
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Amaury Raynel
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
12
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
52
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Amaury Raynel
Player
Nicolas Ifi
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Robert Strombachs
Player
Amaury Raynel
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Amaury Raynel
Player
Erik Arutiunian
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Amaury Raynel
Player
Alex Knaff
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
36%
(
27 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Amaury Raynel
Player
Alexis Gautier
73%
(
99 of
136)
1st Serve %
67%
(
82 of
123)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
50 of
82)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
40%
(
55 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
123)
133
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(7) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Amaury Raynel
Player
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
56%
(
31 of
55)
1st Serve %
37%
(
20 of
54)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Federico Campana Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Federico Campana
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Federico Campana
Player
Sami Ben Abdennibi
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Campana
Player
Tair Niyazov
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Maksim Shin
Player
Federico Campana
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Federico Campana
Player
Gian Matias Di Natale
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
74
|
2-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Campana
Player
Yannik Kelm
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Maxim Zhukov
Player
Federico Campana
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-3 10-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Campana
Player
Makar Elesin
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Raynel Vs Campana Prediction H2H Images To Share

