Amarissa Kiara Toth vs Eva Marie Voracek Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W L
Form
W W W W L W W W L LHead-to-head: Toth 1 - 0 Voracek
They have played 2 sets in total, with Toth winning 2 and Voracek winning 0. The last match between Toth and Voracek was at the W35 Antalya, 14-02-2025, Quarterfinals, Clay with Amarissa Kiara Toth getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
W35 Antalya(14-02-2025)
6
2
6
2
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Joint VS Errani PREDICTION Hard
Miami Open - Miami wta
16 Mar 2025 / Q1 round
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
Rune VS Draper PREDICTION Hard
BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells atp
17 Mar 2025 / Final
ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Eva Marie Voracek
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats
1
H2H Matches
0
2
Sets Won
0
12
Games Won
4
0
Aces (Total)
1
3
Total Double Faults
3
1:42:34
Average Match Time
1:42:34
69% (41/59)
1st Serve %
68% (41/60)
63% (26/41)
1st Serve Win %
49% (20/41)
33% (6/18)
2nd Serve Win %
21% (4/19)
64% (7/11)
Break Points Won % (Total)
43% (3/7)
60% (36/60)
Return Points Win %
46% (27/59)
100% (1/1)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win %
0% (0/0)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
0% (0/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Amarissa Kiara Toth vs Eva Marie Voracek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Amarissa Kiara Toth 1 - 0 Eva Marie Voracek
Second serve performance: Recent form indicates that Toth has displayed an impressive prowess on their second serve, winning 53.6% of points, while Voracek has achieved a marginally lower success rate of 52.04%. The correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of match predictions should not be overlooked.
Return game stats: Delving into the return game statistics, Toth has demonstrated exceptional skills in recent form, triumphing in 60.37% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Voracek has achieved a commendable rate of 59.83%. Moreover, their first serve return statistics stand at 46.41% and 43.95% respectively. Such statistics hold a strong correlation in determining favorability in this upcoming H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: An analysis of their performances under pressure unveils that Toth has shown resilience by saving 50.23% of breakpoints, whereas Voracek has displayed an even greater ability to save breakpoints, standing at 56.4%. This notable statistic holds significance in making in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the course of the previous year, Toth has emerged victorious in an impressive 72.73% of matches played, accumulating a win-loss record of 48/18. Voracek, on the other hand, has achieved a slightly lower success rate of 70.21%, with a win-loss record of 33/14. These figures provide an overall head-to-head prediction overview.
Best surface: Analyzing their performance on different surfaces, Toth boasts a remarkable win percentage of 67% on clay (W/L 126/61) while proving less dominant on hard courts with a win percentage of 50% (W/L 3/3). Comparatively, Voracek excels on clay courts, securing a win percentage of 69% (W/L 57/26), while encountering more challenges on hard courts with a win percentage of 52% (W/L 16/15).
Player level: In the past year, Toth has predominantly contested on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, exhibiting an impressive win rate of 66.67% (W/L 30/15). Conversely, Voracek has primarily competed in the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, boasting a win percentage of 67.86% (W/L 19/9). When considering these statistics to predict the favorite, it is crucial to account for the event level at which they have been performing.
Opponent quality stats: Over the span of 12 months, Toth has faced opponents with an average rank of 241.14, while Voracek has encountered players with an average rank of 156.34. These opponent quality statistics shed light on the level of competition they have faced.
Deciding set performance: Fans interested in live predictions and betting should take note of the performance in deciding sets. Toth has emerged victorious in an impressive 63% of their deciding sets over the past year, while Voracek has achieved a success rate of 38% in all matches played on the tour.
Current event H2H stats: While considering past player performances is valuable in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to examine current event stats to gauge players' current form. To access current event stats for in-form player indication, please refer to the section below (if they have participated in the current event). It is worth noting that certain players tend to excel at specific events, which should be taken into account when making outcome predictions.
Break point conversion: Recent form showcases that Toth effectively seizes opportunities, converting 55.71% of breakpoint chances, whereas Voracek has achieved a slightly lower conversion rate of 46.41% when presented with the chance to break their opponent's serve. This particular statistic is of great importance for in-game live betting tips when players find themselves in a breakpoint situation.
If you are intrigued by models that predict tennis matches, this article serves as an excellent starting point. However, it should be noted that it caters primarily to individuals with an affinity for statistical analysis.
Amarissa Kiara Toth Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Amarissa Kiara Toth
71%
(
72 of
101)
1st Serve %
78%
(
73 of
94)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
49%
(
49 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Simona Waltert
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
46%
(
19 of
41)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
50%
(
32 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
47 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
50 of
83)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Dalma Galfi
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Irina Maria Bara
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Irina Maria Bara
89%
(
72 of
81)
1st Serve %
79%
(
44 of
56)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Pia Lovric
77%
(
72 of
93)
1st Serve %
82%
(
60 of
73)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
44 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
90
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Tena Lukas
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Georgia Andreea Craciun
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve %
76%
(
16 of
21)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
25
Total Points Won
14
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Danka Kovinic
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve %
44%
(
35 of
79)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Eva Marie Voracek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuki Naito
Player
Eva Marie Voracek
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
45%
(
13 of
29)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
55%
(
27 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Eva Marie Voracek
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eva Marie Voracek
Player
Nicole Fossa Huergo
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eva Marie Voracek
Player
Ksenia Laskutova
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
0
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
49%
(
20 of
41)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
25 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eva Marie Voracek
Player
Andreea Prisacariu
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 7-5 13-11 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats
67% (153/75)
Win/Loss
63% (77/45)
65% (328/177)
Sets Win/Loss
61% (170/107)
57% (2524/1885)
Games Win/Loss
55% (1440/1164)
50% (3/3)
Hard Win/Loss
52% (16/15)
68% (138/64)
Clay Win/Loss
67% (60/29)
60% (12/8)
Indoor Hard W/L
50% (1/1)
0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss
0% (0/0)
0.03
Aces Per Game
0.08
69
Aces Total
100
0.27
Double Faults Per Game
0.15
572
Total Double Faults
185
1:30:53
Average Match Time
1:9:30
427.39
Average Opponent Rank
442.08
70% (9398/13351)
1st Serve %
59% (3000/5055)
57% (5348/9398)
1st Serve Win %
58% (1746/3000)
46% (1828/3953)
2nd Serve Win %
47% (975/2055)
54% (1111/2049)
Break Points Won % (Total)
49% (323/655)
52% (7006/13479)
Return Points Win %
47% (2435/5193)
0% (0/0)
Slam W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Masters W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
0% (0/0)
43% (3/4)
Main Tour W/L
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
62% (76/47)
Challenger W/L
55% (18/15)
76% (74/24)
Futures W/L
66% (59/30)
68% (145/213)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
63% (77/122)
29% (2/7)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
66% (19/29)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
35% (7/20)
57% (29/51)
Deciding Set Win %
52% (17/33)
87% (153/133)
1st Set Won, Won Match
89% (81/72)
13% (153/20)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
11% (81/9)
28% (74/21)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
12% (41/5)
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
