E. Mandlik
To Win
H. Giavara
To Win
Amarissa Kiara Toth vs Elizabeth Mandlik Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W W W L L
Form
W L W W W L W W L WHead-To-Head: Toth 1 - 0 Mandlik
They have played 2 sets in total, with Toth winning 2 and Mandlik winning 0. The last match between Toth and Mandlik was at the W50 Otocec, 31-05-2025, Round: Semifinals, Surface: Clay, with Amarissa Kiara Toth getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Amarissa Kiara Toth | 1 |
| Elizabeth Mandlik | 0 |
LAST H2H MATCH: W50 Otocec(31-05-2025)
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Elizabeth Mandlik
6
3
6
3
| Toth | Stats | Mandlik |
|---|---|---|
| 74% (35-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (22-12) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 271 | Ranking | 255 |
| 269 | Highest Rank | 97 |
| 22 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 8 |
| 67% (166-82) | Career Total W/L | 57% (186-143) |
| $5,922 | Career Prize Money | $317,135 |
| 2 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
10 Jul 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sinner VS Djokovic PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS Alcaraz PREDICTION Grass
Wimbledon - London atp
11 Jul 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:21:7 | Average Match Time | 1:21:7 |
| 75% (39/52) | 1st Serve % | 52% (29/56) |
| 62% (24/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (14/29) |
| 54% (7/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (14/27) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 50% (28/56) | Return Points Win % | 40% (21/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Toth vs Mandlik Match Preview :
- How does Toth's serve compare to Mandlik's in recent matches? Toth has won 39.02% of points on their second serve, while Mandlik has a slight edge at 40.31%.
- Who has shown better return game performance? In recent form, Mandlik leads by winning 56.3% of second serve return points compared to Toth's 51.34%. However, Toth has an advantage in first serve returns, winning 39.29% to Mandlik's 36.95%.
- Under pressure scenarios reveal that Mandlik has saved 45.71% of breakpoints compared to Toth's 42.81%, which could be significant for in-game betting predictions.
- Overall match performance favors Toth, who has won 70.27% of their matches over the last year, compared to Mandlik's 55.74% win rate.
- On which surface do these players excel? Toth excels on Clay with a 69% win rate, while Mandlik performs best on Hard courts with a 59% win rate.
- Toth has mostly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a 70% win rate, whereas Mandlik has a 55.56% win rate at a similar event level.
- The average rank of Toth's opponents is 392.39, while Mandlik has faced tougher competition with an average rank of 278.11 over the past 12 months.
- In deciding sets, Toth has the upper hand, winning 47% compared to Mandlik's 43% in the past year.
- Who has the better breakpoint conversion rate? Mandlik converts 42.41% of opportunities, slightly outperforming Toth's 39.91%.
Editorial Prediction (May 30, 2025, UTC):
When analyzing recent performance statistics, Mandlik shows a small edge in key areas such as second serve performance and breakpoint conversion rate. This can make a significant difference in tight matches.
Though Toth demonstrates superior overall match performance in the past year, Mandlik's experience against stronger competition and slightly better performance under pressure could tilt the balance.
Toth's strength on clay contrasts with Mandlik's preference for hard courts, indicating surface may play a role depending on the event's conditions.
Given Mandlik's slight edge in critical areas and Toth's superior overall record, predicting the winner is challenging. However, based on recent trends and competitive adversaries, Mandlik appears slightly more poised to clinch the victory in this upcoming tennis match.
Toth vs Mandlik Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88
Amarissa Kiara Toth Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Amarissa Kiara Toth
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tyra Caterina Grant
Player
Amarissa Kiara Toth
64%
(
67 of
105)
1st Serve %
74%
(
85 of
115)
5
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
6
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
30)
50%
(
10 of
20)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
49%
(
51 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
63 of
115)
117
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Kathinka Von Deichmann
78%
(
61 of
78)
1st Serve %
80%
(
59 of
74)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Sofia Costoulas
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Anastasia Tikhonova
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Haruka Kaji
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve %
82%
(
36 of
44)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Lara Schmidt
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Elizabeth Mandlik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Leonie Kung
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Monika Ekstrand
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
66%
(
79 of
120)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
34%
(
14 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
54 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Anna Sinclair Rogers
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
106)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
55 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Destanee Aiava
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
89)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
44%
(
48 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
100
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anna-Lena Friedsam
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
72%
(
64 of
89)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
81
|
6-7(4) 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Josy Daems
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Vivian Wolff
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Antonia Schmidt
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
56
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67% (166/82) | Win/Loss | 57% (186/143) |
| 65% (358/190) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (424/344) |
| 57% (2740/2039) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (3724/3328) |
| 50% (3/3) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (103/70) |
| 68% (150/69) | Clay Win/Loss | 55% (72/59) |
| 57% (13/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 13% (1/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 59% (10/7) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 74 | Aces Total | 525 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.41 |
| 611 | Total Double Faults | 1398 |
| 1:29:45 | Average Match Time | 1:33:11 |
| 438.34 | Average Opponent Rank | 391.25 |
| 71% (10100/14274) | 1st Serve % | 56% (11931/21377) |
| 57% (5761/10100) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (7440/11931) |
| 46% (1927/4174) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (4235/9445) |
| 54% (1190/2200) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 52% (1431/2764) |
| 52% (7500/14439) | Return Points Win % | 48% (10157/21332) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 50% (11/11) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 33% (4/8) |
| 33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (3/4) | Main Tour W/L | 51% (23/22) |
| 63% (88/52) | Challenger W/L | 55% (106/86) |
| 76% (74/24) | Futures W/L | 72% (42/16) |
| 68% (158/232) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (183/325) |
| 29% (2/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 65% (20/31) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 37% (23/62) |
| 53% (29/55) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (59/114) |
| 86% (169/146) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (179/156) |
| 13% (169/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (179/23) |
| 27% (78/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (150/30) |
Toth vs. Mandlik Prediction Form Trend:
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
