Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Amanda Rodgers vs Constance Sibille Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rodgers vs Sibille analysis and find out who is favored!
Amanda Rodgers vs Constance Sibille Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rodgers has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Sibille has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rodgers, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sibille has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rodgers has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sibille has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rodgers has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Sibille winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rodgers has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 69/ 69), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 8/ 13). Sibille has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 50/ 36), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 67/ 54).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rodgers winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Rodgers winning 2 and Sibille winning 0. The last match between Rodgers and Sibille was at the Brussels, 17-07-2017, Q2 round, Clay with Amanda Rodgers getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rodgers and Sibille have played a deciding set 0 times, with Rodgers winning 0 times and Sibille 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Rodgers winning 0, and Sibille 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rodgers has played against opponents with an average rank of while Sibille has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rodgers has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sibille has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rodgers has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sibille has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Rodgers 1 - 0 Sibille
Ret.
Rank
491
High
31
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
265
High
33
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
49% (124-130)
Career Total W/L
56% (259-203)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,271
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Amanda Rodgers | Constance Sibille |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-0 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Amanda Rodgers | Constance Sibille |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Amanda Rodgers Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats 
Anastasia Nefedova
Player
Amanda Rodgers
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andie K. Daniell
Player
Amanda Rodgers
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rasheeda Mcadoo
Player
Amanda Rodgers
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Chieh-Yu Hsu
Player
Amanda Rodgers
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lauren Davis
Player
Amanda Rodgers
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
4
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
6
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Constance Sibille Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 7-6(3) ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constance Sibille
Player
Gina Veyder
43%
(
16 of
37)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
3
94%
(
15 of
16)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Valentina Ryser
Player
Constance Sibille
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
61 of
87)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
87)
81
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Constance Sibille
Player
Warona Mdlulwa
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Constance Sibille
Player
Yu Shan
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
7
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Indy De Vroome
Player
Constance Sibille
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Constance Sibille
Player
Mathilde Dury
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
1-6 6-4 10-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margaux Orange
Player
Constance Sibille
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
35 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lisa Pigato
Player
Constance Sibille
53%
(
20 of
38)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Constance Sibille
Player
Olympe Lancelot
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Rodgers Vs Sibille Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
