Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin vs Katya Townsend Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Elkin vs Townsend analysis and find out who is favored!
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin vs Katya Townsend Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Elkin has won 42.04% of points on his second serve, while Townsend has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Elkin, in recent form, has won 51.63% of his opponent's second serve points, while Townsend has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.91% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Elkin has saved 45.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Townsend has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Elkin has won 39.02% of matches played (W/L 16/ 25), with Townsend winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Elkin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 12/ 18), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Townsend has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 8/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Elkin has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.93% of matches (W/L 11/ 18), where as Townsend has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Elkin winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Elkin winning 1 and Townsend winning 2. The last match between Elkin and Townsend was at the W15 Cancun, 11-06-2019, Q3, Hard with Katya Townsend getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Elkin and Townsend have played a deciding set 1 times, with Elkin winning 0 times and Townsend 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Elkin winning 0, and Townsend 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Elkin has played against opponents with an average rank of 79.95 while Townsend has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Elkin has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Townsend has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Elkin has converted 58.82% of breakpoint opportunities, and Townsend has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Elkin 0 - 1 Townsend
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
34% (21-40)
Career Total W/L
52% (11-10)
36% (4-7)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin | Katya Townsend |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 17 | 18 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 2-6 10-8 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin | Katya Townsend |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 40% (10/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 46% (97/114) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 13 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.54 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 56 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:43 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 118.45 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (390/635) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (246/390) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (111/245) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 59% (32/54) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (237/580) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 36% (4/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Fanny Ostlund
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ksenia Laskutova
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Emma Van Poppel
59%
(
72 of
123)
1st Serve %
70%
(
69 of
99)
3
Aces
7
15
Double Faults
3
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
49%
(
25 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
41%
(
50 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ellie Daniels
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolyn Campana
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marilouise Van Zyl
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
66%
(
67 of
102)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
111)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
54 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
100
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Julia Peer
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Mia-Leigh Cilliers
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve %
55%
(
21 of
38)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amelia Waligora
Player
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
59%
(
23 of
39)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amanda Carolina Nava Elkin
Player
Tiana Philippides
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Katya Townsend Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nika Kukharchuk
Player
Katya Townsend
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katya Townsend
Player
Gala Arangio
54%
(
39 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
8
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
6-0 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-7(4) 6-4 11-9 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Sewing
Player
Katya Townsend
69%
(
68 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
11
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 6-7(5) 10-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Zoe Gwen Scandalis
Player
Katya Townsend
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
39 of
72)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Noelia Zeballos
Player
Katya Townsend
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
50%
(
26 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Elkin Vs Townsend Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
