A. Anisimova
To Win
TBD
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W W W L LForm
L L W W W W W L L LThey have played 5 sets in total, with Anisimova winning 3 and Ostapenko winning 2. The last match between Anisimova and Ostapenko was at the Qatar TotalEnergies Open - Doha, 15-02-2025, Final, Hard with Amanda Anisimova getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
Qatar TotalEnergies Open - Doha(15-02-2025)
- / Second
- / Second
Miami Open - Miami atp
19 Mar 2025 / First
Miami Open - Miami wta
18 Mar 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-3 |
![]() ![]()
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
||||
6-3 4-6 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Amanda Anisimova
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Recent Form Prediction Analysis:
Head-to-Head Analysis: In their previous encounters, Anisimova and Ostapenko have faced each other once before, with Anisimova failing to secure victory while Ostapenko emerged triumphant. The two players have contested three sets in total, resulting in Anisimova winning one set and Ostapenko winning two. The most recent match between the two took place at the Qatar TotalEnergies Open - Doha on February 22, 2022, on a hard court. In this thrilling encounter, Jelena Ostapenko claimed a hard-fought victory with a scoreline of 6-3, 4-6, 6-4.
Head-to-Head Match Duration: The average match duration in their previous head-to-head battles has been recorded at 1 hour, 39 minutes, and 0 seconds.
Prediction for Deciding Set: Anisimova and Ostapenko have encountered a deciding set once, with Anisimova failing to emerge victorious while Ostapenko triumphed in that instance. This historical data becomes crucial in predicting the outcome should this upcoming match reach a deciding set.
Head-to-Head Extreme Pressure Situations: Anisimova and Ostapenko have never faced each other in tiebreak situations. Thus, no conclusions can be drawn regarding their performance under extreme pressure.
Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the past 12 months, Anisimova has competed against opponents with an average ranking of 127.95. On the other hand, Ostapenko has encountered players with an average rank of 115.81. These statistics shed light on the level of competition each player has faced, further enriching the prediction analysis.
Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players: Delving into their performance in deciding sets provides significant insights. Over the past year, Anisimova has emerged triumphant in 36% of her deciding set battles, while Ostapenko boasts a higher success rate of 58% in all matches played on the tour. These figures inform live predictions and betting decisions, particularly if the upcoming match extends to a deciding set.
Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While historical performance offers valuable indicators in predicting tennis matches, current event statistics are also crucial. Continuously monitoring player performance in the ongoing event provides a reliable gauge of their form. For the most up-to-date statistics, please refer to the relevant section below (available if the players have already participated in matches during the current event). It should be noted that certain players may exhibit superior performance at specific events, and this must be considered when making predictions.
Break Point Conversion: In terms of break point conversion, Anisimova has impressively converted 41.04% of her opportunities, while Ostapenko has showcased a slightly higher success rate of 46.92% when attempting to break her opponents' serve. This statistic becomes particularly relevant during in-game live betting, as it determines the probability of success when either player encounters a break point opportunity.
If you are intrigued by models that predict tennis matches, consider perusing this article (Warning: Stats enthusiasts only).
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Belinda Bencic
Player
Amanda Anisimova
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
8
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
39 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 6-7(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Amanda Anisimova
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Ekaterina Alexandrova
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Marta Kostyuk
71%
(
84 of
119)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
104)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
53 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
104)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Leylah Annie Fernandez
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Victoria Azarenka
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
78)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Emma Raducanu
Player
Amanda Anisimova
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
51%
(
40 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
76%
(
38 of
50)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Xinyu Wang
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
7
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
9
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
78)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
F |
![]() ![]()
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
![]() ![]()
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Iga Swiatek
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Ons Jabeur
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R3 |
![]() ![]()
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Jasmine Paolini
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
40 of
83)
5
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
10
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
43)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Aoi Ito
48%
(
20 of
42)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
13 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Ons Jabeur
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
61%
(
50 of
82)
1st Serve %
52%
(
45 of
86)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
28%
(
9 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Belinda Bencic
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
2
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
10
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H |
view more
View full predicted draw for Anisimova in Miami
View full predicted draw for Ostapenko in Miami