MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Amanda Anisimova vs Jelena Ostapenko Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-to-head: Anisimova 1 - 1 Ostapenko

They have played 5 sets in total, with Anisimova winning 3 and Ostapenko winning 2. The last match between Anisimova and Ostapenko was at the Qatar TotalEnergies Open - Doha, 15-02-2025, Final, Hard with Amanda Anisimova getting the victory 6-4 6-3.

Qatar TotalEnergies Open - Doha(15-02-2025)

69% (9-4)
YTD Win/Loss
46% (6-7)
1
Head-to-Head
1
17
Ranking
25
17
Highest Rank
5
23
Age
27
R
Plays
R
4
Titles
15
63% (170-102)
Career Total W/L
62% (397-246)
$4,644,555
Career Prize Money
$11,127,722
1
YTD Titles
0
1
Hard H2H
1
0
Clay H2H
0
0
Indoor H2H
0
0
Grass H2H
0

Upcoming Match

Upcoming Match

Today’s Tennis Tips:

Vukic VS Goffin PREDICTION Hard

Miami Open - Miami atp

19 Mar 2025 / First

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

David Goffin

To Win

72.79 %
19.03%

Yuan VS Siniakova PREDICTION Hard

Miami Open - Miami wta

18 Mar 2025 / First

ODDS
PREDICTION
EDGE

Katerina Siniakova

To Win

89.7 %
29.09%

Anisimova VS Ostapenko H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-4 6-3
cross
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
70% ( 40 of 57)
1st Serve %
58% ( 40 of 69)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
73% ( 29 of 40)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 26 of 40)
35% ( 6 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 9 of 29)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
39% ( 22 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 34 of 69)
69
Total Points Won
57
6-3 4-6 6-4
cross
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Amanda Anisimova
56% ( 47 of 84)
1st Serve %
59% ( 49 of 83)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
66% ( 31 of 47)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 29 of 49)
51% ( 19 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 14 of 34)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
45% ( 5 of 11)
40% ( 34 of 84)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 40 of 83)
90
Total Points Won
77

Anisimova VS Ostapenko H2H Stats

Amanda Anisimova Anisimova
Stats
Jelena Ostapenko Ostapenko
1
H2H Matches
1
3
Sets Won
2
25
Games Won
23
7
Aces (Total)
5
4
Total Double Faults
14
1:30:10
Average Match Time
1:30:10
64% (89/140)
1st Serve %
57% (87/153)
65% (58/89)
1st Serve Win %
66% (57/87)
39% (20/51)
2nd Serve Win %
42% (28/66)
43% (10/23)
Break Points Won % (Total)
53% (8/15)
44% (68/153)
Return Points Win %
44% (62/140)
50% (1/2)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
50% (1/2)
0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)
Deciding Set Win %
100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)
1st Set Won, Won Match
100% (1/1)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
0% (1/0)
0% (1/0)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Amanda Anisimova vs Jelena Ostapenko Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Amanda Anisimova 1 - 1 Jelena Ostapenko

Recent Form Prediction Analysis:

  1. Second Serve Performance: In the past six months, the second serve performance of Amanda Anisimova and Jelena Ostapenko has been noteworthy. Anisimova has displayed a commendable winning rate of 50.66% on her second serve, while Ostapenko has achieved a respectable 40.09% success rate. It is important to note that this statistical aspect has exhibited a strong correlation with match prediction accuracy.
  2. Return Game Statistics: Analyzing the return game stats of these players in recent form provides valuable insights. Anisimova has demonstrated an impressive ability to win 59.15% of her opponent's second serve points, whereas Ostapenko has exhibited a slightly lower success rate of 58.21%. In terms of first serve returns, Anisimova's record stands at 37.68%, while Ostapenko's stands at 40.61%. These figures have a significant impact on determining the favored player in their head-to-head matchup.
  3. Under Pressure Analysis: Examining how players perform under pressure can aid in making betting predictions. Anisimova has effectively saved 58.57% of breakpoints in recent matches, highlighting her resilience during crucial moments. Conversely, Ostapenko has managed to salvage 53.47% of breakpoints, further emphasizing the importance of this statistic in in-game betting predictions.
  4. Performance Overview: Reviewing the overall performance of these players in the past year offers valuable insights. Anisimova has emerged victorious in 65.79% of matches played (25 wins, 13 losses), while Ostapenko has secured wins in 53.49% of her matches (23 wins, 20 losses). This comprehensive head-to-head prediction overview provides a comprehensive perspective on their current form and prowess.
  5. Best Surface: Assessing the players' performance on different surfaces yields compelling data. Anisimova thrives on clay, boasting a career win percentage of 65% (48 wins, 26 losses) on this surface. In contrast, her performance on indoor hard courts is less impressive, with a win percentage of 50% (2 wins, 2 losses). Ostapenko's most successful surface is grass, with a win rate of 69% (53 wins, 24 losses). However, she struggles relatively more on hard courts, with a win percentage of 55% (143 wins, 115 losses).
  6. Player Level: Evaluating the level of play at which these players have frequently competed in the past year offers valuable insights. Anisimova has predominantly participated in the prestigious Masters series, achieving an impressive 76.47% win rate (13 wins, 4 losses) in these high-profile events. In comparison, Ostapenko has primarily competed in the Masters series as well, garnering a commendable 66.67% win rate (14 wins, 7 losses). When evaluating the favorite player, it is crucial to consider the relative event level they have been participating in.

Head-to-Head Analysis: In their previous encounters, Anisimova and Ostapenko have faced each other once before, with Anisimova failing to secure victory while Ostapenko emerged triumphant. The two players have contested three sets in total, resulting in Anisimova winning one set and Ostapenko winning two. The most recent match between the two took place at the Qatar TotalEnergies Open - Doha on February 22, 2022, on a hard court. In this thrilling encounter, Jelena Ostapenko claimed a hard-fought victory with a scoreline of 6-3, 4-6, 6-4.

Head-to-Head Match Duration: The average match duration in their previous head-to-head battles has been recorded at 1 hour, 39 minutes, and 0 seconds.

Prediction for Deciding Set: Anisimova and Ostapenko have encountered a deciding set once, with Anisimova failing to emerge victorious while Ostapenko triumphed in that instance. This historical data becomes crucial in predicting the outcome should this upcoming match reach a deciding set.

Head-to-Head Extreme Pressure Situations: Anisimova and Ostapenko have never faced each other in tiebreak situations. Thus, no conclusions can be drawn regarding their performance under extreme pressure.

Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the past 12 months, Anisimova has competed against opponents with an average ranking of 127.95. On the other hand, Ostapenko has encountered players with an average rank of 115.81. These statistics shed light on the level of competition each player has faced, further enriching the prediction analysis.

Deciding Set Performance vs. All Players: Delving into their performance in deciding sets provides significant insights. Over the past year, Anisimova has emerged triumphant in 36% of her deciding set battles, while Ostapenko boasts a higher success rate of 58% in all matches played on the tour. These figures inform live predictions and betting decisions, particularly if the upcoming match extends to a deciding set.

Current Event Head-to-Head Statistics: While historical performance offers valuable indicators in predicting tennis matches, current event statistics are also crucial. Continuously monitoring player performance in the ongoing event provides a reliable gauge of their form. For the most up-to-date statistics, please refer to the relevant section below (available if the players have already participated in matches during the current event). It should be noted that certain players may exhibit superior performance at specific events, and this must be considered when making predictions.

Break Point Conversion: In terms of break point conversion, Anisimova has impressively converted 41.04% of her opportunities, while Ostapenko has showcased a slightly higher success rate of 46.92% when attempting to break her opponents' serve. This statistic becomes particularly relevant during in-game live betting, as it determines the probability of success when either player encounters a break point opportunity.

If you are intrigued by models that predict tennis matches, consider perusing this article (Warning: Stats enthusiasts only).

Amanda Anisimova Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R2
cross
Belinda Bencic
Player
Amanda Anisimova
59% ( 57 of 96)
1st Serve %
64% ( 61 of 95)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
8
61% ( 35 of 57)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 37 of 61)
56% ( 22 of 39)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 12 of 34)
54% ( 7 of 13)
Break Points Won
40% ( 4 of 10)
41% ( 39 of 96)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 46 of 95)
103
Total Points Won
88
L
6-4 6-7(3) 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Amanda Anisimova
59% ( 27 of 46)
1st Serve %
64% ( 38 of 59)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
89% ( 24 of 27)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 19 of 38)
47% ( 9 of 19)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 8 of 21)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
28% ( 13 of 46)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 32 of 59)
65
Total Points Won
40
L
6-2 6-3 H2H
F
cross
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
70% ( 40 of 57)
1st Serve %
58% ( 40 of 69)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
73% ( 29 of 40)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 26 of 40)
35% ( 6 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 9 of 29)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
39% ( 22 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 34 of 69)
69
Total Points Won
57
W
6-4 6-3 H2H
SF
cross
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Ekaterina Alexandrova
70% ( 53 of 76)
1st Serve %
75% ( 48 of 64)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
60% ( 32 of 53)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 31 of 48)
61% ( 14 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
25% ( 4 of 16)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
10% ( 1 of 10)
39% ( 30 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 29 of 64)
75
Total Points Won
65
W
6-3 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Marta Kostyuk
71% ( 84 of 119)
1st Serve %
67% ( 70 of 104)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
56% ( 47 of 84)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 41 of 70)
54% ( 19 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 15 of 34)
37% ( 7 of 19)
Break Points Won
32% ( 6 of 19)
45% ( 53 of 119)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 48 of 104)
114
Total Points Won
109
W
4-6 7-5 6-4 H2H
R3
cross
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Leylah Annie Fernandez
69% ( 34 of 49)
1st Serve %
63% ( 26 of 41)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
76% ( 26 of 34)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 14 of 26)
53% ( 8 of 15)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 5 of 15)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
31% ( 15 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 22 of 41)
56
Total Points Won
34
W
6-3 6-0 H2H
R2
cross
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
55% ( 37 of 67)
1st Serve %
63% ( 50 of 79)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
68% ( 25 of 37)
1st Serve Won
60% ( 30 of 50)
60% ( 18 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 12 of 29)
31% ( 4 of 13)
Break Points Won
20% ( 2 of 10)
36% ( 24 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 37 of 79)
80
Total Points Won
66
W
6-4 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Victoria Azarenka
75% ( 49 of 65)
1st Serve %
56% ( 44 of 78)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
71% ( 35 of 49)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 28 of 44)
38% ( 6 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 13 of 34)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
37% ( 24 of 65)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 37 of 78)
78
Total Points Won
65
W
6-3 7-5 H2H
R2
cross
Emma Raducanu
Player
Amanda Anisimova
66% ( 52 of 79)
1st Serve %
58% ( 42 of 73)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
54% ( 28 of 52)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 23 of 42)
41% ( 11 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
26% ( 8 of 31)
80% ( 8 of 10)
Break Points Won
38% ( 5 of 13)
51% ( 40 of 79)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 42 of 73)
81
Total Points Won
71
L
6-3 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
49% ( 27 of 55)
1st Serve %
76% ( 38 of 50)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
63% ( 17 of 27)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 19 of 38)
57% ( 16 of 28)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 4 of 12)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
40% ( 22 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 27 of 50)
60
Total Points Won
45
W
6-2 6-3 H2H

Jelena Ostapenko Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R2
cross
Xinyu Wang
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
57% ( 42 of 74)
1st Serve %
49% ( 26 of 53)
7
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
76% ( 32 of 42)
1st Serve Won
77% ( 20 of 26)
44% ( 14 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 14 of 27)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
38% ( 28 of 74)
Rtn Points Won
36% ( 19 of 53)
65
Total Points Won
62
L
6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
56% ( 32 of 57)
1st Serve %
53% ( 41 of 78)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
9
69% ( 22 of 32)
1st Serve Won
61% ( 25 of 41)
52% ( 13 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 13 of 37)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
39% ( 22 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 40 of 78)
75
Total Points Won
60
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
F
cross
Amanda Anisimova
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
70% ( 40 of 57)
1st Serve %
58% ( 40 of 69)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
73% ( 29 of 40)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 26 of 40)
35% ( 6 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 9 of 29)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
39% ( 22 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 34 of 69)
69
Total Points Won
57
L
6-4 6-3 H2H
SF
cross
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Iga Swiatek
54% ( 26 of 48)
1st Serve %
60% ( 29 of 48)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
69% ( 18 of 26)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 14 of 29)
64% ( 14 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 7 of 19)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
33% ( 16 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 27 of 48)
59
Total Points Won
37
W
6-3 6-1 H2H
QF
cross
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Ons Jabeur
60% ( 35 of 58)
1st Serve %
56% ( 28 of 50)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
71% ( 25 of 35)
1st Serve Won
43% ( 12 of 28)
43% ( 10 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 9 of 22)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
40% ( 23 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
58% ( 29 of 50)
64
Total Points Won
44
W
6-2 6-2 H2H
R3
cross
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Jasmine Paolini
57% ( 29 of 51)
1st Serve %
61% ( 31 of 51)
9
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
76% ( 22 of 29)
1st Serve Won
45% ( 14 of 31)
50% ( 11 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 9 of 20)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
35% ( 18 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 28 of 51)
61
Total Points Won
41
W
6-2 6-2 H2H
R2
cross
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Liudmila Samsonova
54% ( 41 of 76)
1st Serve %
48% ( 40 of 83)
5
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
10
68% ( 28 of 41)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 26 of 40)
37% ( 13 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 14 of 43)
60% ( 6 of 10)
Break Points Won
63% ( 5 of 8)
46% ( 35 of 76)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 43 of 83)
84
Total Points Won
75
W
7-6(5) 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Jelena Ostapenko
Player
Aoi Ito
48% ( 20 of 42)
1st Serve %
67% ( 35 of 52)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
85% ( 17 of 20)
1st Serve Won
49% ( 17 of 35)
55% ( 12 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
24% ( 4 of 17)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
31% ( 13 of 42)
Rtn Points Won
60% ( 31 of 52)
60
Total Points Won
34
W
6-2 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Ons Jabeur
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
61% ( 50 of 82)
1st Serve %
52% ( 45 of 86)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
72% ( 36 of 50)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 25 of 45)
28% ( 9 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 19 of 41)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
42% ( 5 of 12)
45% ( 37 of 82)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 42 of 86)
87
Total Points Won
81
L
7-6(4) 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Belinda Bencic
Player
Jelena Ostapenko
66% ( 51 of 77)
1st Serve %
52% ( 41 of 79)
2
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
10
67% ( 34 of 51)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 27 of 41)
42% ( 11 of 26)
2nd Serve Won
34% ( 13 of 38)
31% ( 5 of 16)
Break Points Won
57% ( 4 of 7)
42% ( 32 of 77)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 39 of 79)
84
Total Points Won
72
L
6-3 7-6(6) H2H
banner

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

63% (170/102)
Win/Loss
62% (397/246)
62% (393/243)
Sets Win/Loss
58% (872/626)
55% (3144/2605)
Games Win/Loss
54% (7362/6392)
62% (107/65)
Hard Win/Loss
55% (143/118)
65% (48/26)
Clay Win/Loss
67% (108/54)
50% (2/2)
Indoor Hard W/L
65% (93/50)
59% (13/9)
Grass Win/Loss
69% (53/24)
0.2
Aces Per Game
0.23
562
Aces Total
1553
0.36
Double Faults Per Game
0.43
1009
Total Double Faults
2878
1:27:22
Average Match Time
1:12:49
251.58
Average Opponent Rank
347.95
65% (11937/18451)
1st Serve %
56% (19929/35691)
63% (7567/11937)
1st Serve Win %
65% (13014/19929)
47% (3094/6514)
2nd Serve Win %
44% (6855/15748)
48% (1113/2336)
Break Points Won % (Total)
49% (2212/4518)
46% (8357/18308)
Return Points Win %
46% (16324/35323)
58% (32/23)
Slam W/L
62% (59/36)
58% (49/36)
Masters W/L
54% (86/73)
0% (0/0)
Cups W/L
58% (18/13)
64% (53/30)
Main Tour W/L
60% (132/89)
0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L
0% (0/0)
73% (36/13)
Challenger W/L
66% (53/27)
0% (0/0)
Futures W/L
86% (49/8)
63% (168/267)
Best of 3 Sets Win %
62% (387/629)
33% (1/3)
Best of 5 Sets Win %
50% (2/4)
53% (26/49)
Tiebreaks Win % (Total)
57% (74/130)
45% (41/92)
Deciding Set Win %
61% (133/218)
82% (178/146)
1st Set Won, Won Match
86% (376/324)
17% (178/31)
1st Set Won, Lost Match
14% (376/52)
27% (94/25)
1st Set Lost, Won Match
27% (267/71)

See recent tennis photos of Anisimova and Ostapenko

Potential H2H Matches This Week For Amanda Anisimova

Miami Open - Miami

Anisimova vs Andreeva H2H (), could play in The Third round

Anisimova vs Wang H2H (), could play in The Third round

Anisimova vs Kudermetova H2H (), could play in The Third round

Anisimova vs Sun H2H (), could play in The Second round

Anisimova vs Sherif H2H (), could play in The Second round

View full predicted draw for Anisimova in Miami

Potential H2H Matches This Week For Jelena Ostapenko

Miami Open - Miami

Avanesyan vs Ostapenko H2H (), could play in The Third round

Andreeva vs Ostapenko H2H (), could play in The Third round

Keys vs Ostapenko H2H (), could play in The Third round

Volynets vs Ostapenko H2H (), could play in The Second round

Eala vs Ostapenko H2H (), could play in The Second round

View full predicted draw for Ostapenko in Miami

Other Predictions

  • Loading news...