Prediction of Alvaro Guillen Meza [211th] vs Mariano Kestelboim [423rd] Head-to-Head At The 2025 San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W L L W W W W L
Form
W W L W W W W L W LH2H: Meza 2 - 0 Kestelboim
They have played 4 sets in total, with Meza winning 4 and Kestelboim winning 0. The last match between Meza and Kestelboim was at the Campinas Challenger, 02-04-2025, Second, Clay with Alvaro Guillen Meza getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Alvaro Guillen Meza | 2 |
| Mariano Kestelboim | 0 |
| Meza | Stats | Kestelboim |
|---|---|---|
| 64% (16-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 64% (18-10) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 211 | Ranking | 423 |
| 211 | Highest Rank | 387 |
| 22 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 5 |
| 59% (148-103) | Career Total W/L | 60% (392-259) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Meza VS Kestelboim H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 |
Stats 
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve %
71%
(
15 of
21)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
26
Total Points Won
12
|
||||
Meza VS Kestelboim H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 10 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:23:30 | Average Match Time | 1:23:30 |
| 73% (66/91) | 1st Serve % | 57% (49/86) |
| 67% (44/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (28/49) |
| 60% (15/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (13/37) |
| 62% (8/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (2/8) |
| 52% (45/86) | Return Points Win % | 35% (32/91) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Alvaro Guillen Meza vs Mariano Kestelboim Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Meza 2 - 0 Kestelboim
Editorial Prediction:
In a comparison of recent serving performances, Meza has secured 39.63% of points on their second serve over the last six months, while Kestelboim slightly edges ahead with 41.33%. This performance metric has shown to correlate strongly with predicting match outcomes. Additionally, both players' abilities in return games provide valuable insight; Meza has won 49.52% of opponents' second serve points, surpassing Kestelboim's 47.69%. In first serve returns, Kestelboim has a small advantage with a 33.95% conversion compared to Meza's 32.27%. These statistics are critical in evaluating who is favored in their head-to-head confrontation.
Examining their performances under pressure, Meza has an edge in saving break points, boasting a 55.11% success rate against Kestelboim's 48.49%. This could prove vital during in-game betting scenarios. When reviewing career surface preferences, both players excel on clay with Meza and Kestelboim each holding a 61% win rate. For their worst performances, Meza has struggled on indoor hard courts with no victories, whereas Kestelboim performs least favorably on hard surfaces, achieving a 58% win rate.
The head-to-head record shows that Meza and Kestelboim have battled once before, with Meza emerging victorious. This match at the M 25 Punta del Este on clay resulted in a dominant 6-1, 6-2 win for Meza. Despite the small sample size, this outcome heavily influences predictions for their next meeting. Historically, matches between these two have averaged 42 minutes and 46 seconds in duration.
Meza's recent match win percentage stands at 57.35% (W/L 39/29) compared to Kestelboim's 60.94% (W/L 39/25), providing an overview of their success over the past year. At the player level, Meza has competed predominantly in Challengers/ITF events with a 53.7% win rate, whereas Kestelboim's focus on Futures/Satellites/ITF events has seen a higher win rate of 66.67%. This context of competition level is crucial for evaluating their match predictions.
In terms of opponent quality, Meza has faced opponents with an average rank of 303.88, slightly tougher than Kestelboim's opposition, who average a rank of 312.27. Additionally, for matches requiring a deciding set, Kestelboim has performed better, winning 50% compared to Meza's 40% over the last year.
Finally, when considering break point efficiency in recent form, Meza's conversion rate of 39.22% is noticeably stronger than Kestelboim's 31.03%. These insights collectively suggest that while both players have their strengths, Meza might hold a slight advantage given their past victory against Kestelboim and a statistical edge in several key areas.
Thus, analyzing the data leads to a prediction that Meza will likely come out on top in their next encounter.
Alvaro Guillen Meza Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Matias Soto
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Murkel Dellien
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Collarini
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
40 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mariano Kestelboim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Alvaro Guillen Meza
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
65)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Guido Ivan Justo
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lautaro Midon
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
7
Total Points Won
3
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Alejo Lorenzo Lingua Lavallen
79%
(
55 of
70)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Lucio Ratti
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
52 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
6
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Gustavo Ribeiro De Almeida
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mariano Kestelboim
Player
Nicolas Kicker
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (144/93) | Win/Loss | 60% (357/234) |
| 60% (327/221) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (779/551) |
| 54% (2755/2316) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (6440/5401) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 205 | Aces Total | 358 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 745 | Total Double Faults | 891 |
| 1:44:30 | Average Match Time | 1:22:33 |
| 361.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 467.24 |
| 71% (10312/14621) | 1st Serve % | 72% (20240/28208) |
| 63% (6507/10312) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (12378/20240) |
| 48% (2082/4309) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3816/7980) |
| 47% (865/1839) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1815/3819) |
| 45% (6688/14921) | Return Points Win % | 47% (13425/28799) |
| 61% (142/234) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (349/579) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
| 52% (31/60) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (46/94) |
| 47% (35/75) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (83/153) |
| 84% (152/127) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (346/314) |
| 16% (152/25) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (346/31) |
| 20% (85/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (245/41) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
