Alvaro Guillen Meza vs Facundo Mena Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Facundo Mena's recent form shows a second serve point win rate of 45.74%, slightly outperforming Alvaro Guillen Meza's 43.55%. Does this make him a favorite? Not necessarily, but it gives Mena a minor edge in serve proficiency.
• Alvaro Guillen Meza excels in return game metrics, winning 48.28% of opponents' second serve points compared to Mena's 46.62%. Additionally, Meza has a superior first serve return rate of 31.48%, whereas Mena's stands at 23.62%.
• Under pressure, Facundo Mena saves 57.03% of breakpoints, outperforming Alvaro Guillen Meza, who saves 53.30%. This could be crucial in high-tension moments.
• Performance over the past year positions Alvaro Guillen Meza ahead, winning 61.33% of his matches compared to Mena's 46.81%, indicating a stronger overall form.
• Surface preference plays a role: Mena is most successful on indoor hard courts (67%), while Meza thrives on clay (67%). This implies surfaces impact their effectiveness notably.
• Both players primarily compete in the Challengers/ITF > $10K circuit. Meza has a better match win rate of 58.62%, compared to Mena's 47.37%.
• Direct head-to-head results favor Meza, who has won both encounters against Mena, claiming four out of five sets.
• Facundo Mena's opponents have an average rank of 285.57, while Meza's average opponent rank is slightly more challenging at 277.8.
• In deciding sets, Meza has a higher win percentage at 56%, compared to Mena's 47%, suggesting better performance under decisive circumstances.
• Looking at breakpoint conversion, Meza converts at 38.17% versus Mena's 27.50%, a potentially significant factor during crucial points in a match.

Editorial Prediction (November 22, 2025, UTC):

Both players have demonstrated strengths and challenges in their recent tennis performances. Facundo Mena shows a slight advantage in second serve success and break point saves, which could give him an edge in maintaining serve and staying competitive in crucial games.

However, Alvaro Guillen Meza's proficiency in return games and his solid head-to-head record against Mena suggest a consistent competitive advantage. His ability to convert break points and perform in deciding sets further strengthens his position as a formidable opponent.

Given Meza's superior track record and the surface suitability aligning with his strengths, the upcoming match might see Alvaro Guillen Meza emerge as the likely winner.